How does science explain this?

what if.............. no it can't be............ but what if......

:0

my senses may have deserted me entirely but just what if................................................ there is no such thing as red......?!

0_o

If there is a non zero R value, you are looking at red subpixels

>If there is a non zero R value, you are looking at red subpixels
Which is irrelevant because the illusion is about the absence of red pixels, not the absence of red subpixels.
This is my favorite shade of red.

>Which is irrelevant because the illusion is about the absence of red pixels, not the absence of red subpixels.
You have a point there, I know.

Painter here.

This is a technique that painters have been using for hundreds of years.

If we take an object who's color we are familiar with, we will still recognize it as that color even if it is in shadow or colored light.

It's probably a similar pattern recognition to why we can understand a language in all sorts of different accents.

if you see an image that was filtered with photoshop to fuck up the colors then your mind is able to fix the colors
wow what an incredible phenomenon

It's pretty intuitive actually. It's just nano textures that act as wavelength filters.

Oh wait, I thought you actually asked something slightly interesting. This is literally just babby's first optical illusion. You never saw the column on the chessboard?

Yep. It's even easier to visualize when you look at the u component.
Lighter = redder
Darker = greener

Here it is with all red stripped out. All RGB values set to 0, G, B

Lmao
/thread

Why do we have the same garbage threads every week?

new batch of posters every week from reddit

>Here it is with all red stripped out. All RGB values set to 0, G, B
See:
"Red pixels" doesn't mean "any pixels with with a nonzero R value." By your definition of "red" almost every color on this chart is "red." You're confusing pixels with subpixels basically.

Shut Up faggot