So was he the best mathematician of the 20th century

would you agree

>never proved his shit
>ended up saying much bullshit
Fermat did all that before it was poo.

in terms of pure mathematical ability he was... he might of also been the greatest of all time in ability with the likes of gauss and euler

but in terms of accomplishments/legacy he didn't really push math foward

Grothendieck, for example was a much more influential mathematician in the 20th century?

But did he poo in the loo?

>Grothendieck, for example was a much more influential mathematician in the 20th century?
This isn't a question you stupid brainlet.

what makes Grothendieck more influential than Ramanujan?

In terms of talent, the mathematicians who worked with Ramanujan considered him king. They considered him more talented than even Hilbert.
However he was also ignorant and nothing can change that.

is he above grothendieck?

Do brainlets actually think this?

>proving results
it's pretty clear at this point that only mediocre mathematicians devote their lives to that kind of hair-splitting