Reminder that α=α is circular logic.
Reminder that α=α is circular logic
Sebastian Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
us.metamath.org
twitter.com
Parker Wilson
>what are axions
funny-meme_where-wojak_has_an_impossibly_small-head_denoting_a-small_brain.jpg
Blake Long
I usually hate anime but I have to say, she is a cute
Luke Wright
Depends on how you define alpha.
If you use set theory, it is perfectly acceptable.
Andrew Hall
What else would [math]\alpha[/math] be, exactly? [math]\beta[/math]?
Literally kill yourself, brainlet.
Zachary Gonzalez
>what are axions
Faith.
Andrew Allen
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I had just forgotten!!!
Lincoln Allen
Stupid weeb.
Jaxon Howard
> α and α are symbols for the same object
>circular reasoning
Pick one
Levi Price
Iori is for _____
Andrew Sullivan
Circular logic is the purest and most valid form of logic.
Jaxson Martinez
>Pick one
en.wikipedia.org
A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy in which something is falsely claimed to be an "either/or" situation, when in fact there is at least one additional option.[1]
A false dilemma can arise intentionally, when a fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice or outcome. The opposite of this fallacy is false compromise.
The false dilemma fallacy can also arise simply by accidental omission of additional options rather than by deliberate deception. For example "Stacey spoke out against capitalism, therefore she must be a communist" (she may be neither capitalist nor communist). "Roger opposed an atheist argument against Christianity, so he must be a Christian" (When it's assumed the opposition by itself means he's a Christian). Roger might be an atheist who disagrees with the logic of some particular argument against Christianity. Additionally, it can be the result of habitual tendency, whatever the cause, to view the world with limited sets of options.
Some philosophers and scholars believe that "unless a distinction can be made rigorous and precise it isn't really a distinction".[2] An exception is analytic philosopher John Searle, who called it an incorrect assumption that produces false dichotomies.[3] Searle insists that "it is a condition of the adequacy of a precise theory of an indeterminate phenomenon that it should precisely characterize that phenomenon as indeterminate; and a distinction is no less a distinction for allowing for a family of related, marginal, diverging cases."[3] Similarly, when two options are presented, they often are, although not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities; this may lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression that the options are mutually exclusive of each other, even though they need not be.[4] Furthermore, the options in false dichotomies typically are presented as being collectively exhaustive, in which...
Aiden Edwards
reminder that your gay
Cooper Jones
Don't crossboard you fag.
Jayden Wood
Why the xenophobia and homophobia?
Camden Butler
it's the definition of the identity operator and very important
Angel Foster
Without the axiom of equality you can't do anything meaningful.
Lucas Nguyen
Reflexivity is the degenerate circle aka constant path at a point.
So you are correct.
Blake Mitchell
>Depends on how you define alpha.
No it doesn't. Equality is always reflexive.
Landon Williams
Not faith, as it's self-evident or experiential, depending on who you ask, neither are faith based.
Eli Phillips
Nathaniel Walker
kek
Christian Murphy
How can it be circular logic when the earth is flat?
Evan Wilson
hmmm funny how what is self-evident or experiential is subjective
Thomas Morgan
Why?