that's what I interpreted it as.
the funny thing is that he repeatedly talks at length about the pareto distribution whenever he wants to prove inequality is natural. So not only does he know that some things aren't normal, he knows about distributions that can't be normalized.
Do the arithmetic
actually every distribution (poisson, binomial, etc.) converges to normality as the sample size approaches infinity
ples b trol
Has he ever actually admitted to being bad at math? Source?
I remember one video where he tried to calculate something statistical in his head and he said that his quantitative IQ was worse than his verbal IQ and that's why he was struggling to calculate it.
I've gone through so many of his videos I can't pin point the exact video but I remember it was one of his videos at home with a webcam.
I like his biological essentialism. Take away all his religious and political dogma and he’s a fairly smart guy in the field of Psychology. Probably the best in his field desu.
the way he views stories and their themes and meaning is so riddled with confirmation bias it bothers me. Bought his future authoring course tho....
>almost everything is normally distributed, and that's a theorem in mathematics
I needed this today.
Benatar won.