How would Veeky Forumsentists go about creating a humane eugenics program for the betterment of all human societies...

How would Veeky Forumsentists go about creating a humane eugenics program for the betterment of all human societies? Does CRISPR gene editing work or is it just a meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Human_Rights_Council
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

sterilize everyone with

How would I do it? It'd be a few different avenues.

Firstly, it'd reward people for not having children. We'd actually pay women to use an IUD. Yep, totally pay women to be unimpregnatable. And similarly, pay men in order to allow society to stick a little sponge down to block the seminal ducts. Something that could be removed in a jiffy by a proper surgeon with no side effects or permanent damage.

With people actually receiving money to not breed without wanting to do it, suddenly there are no accidental babies. They can control their family planning 100%. Enough money that it can help them live, not enough to just sit on their ass and hoard it while letting the government fill their bank accounts. No accidents mean no baby mamas that go "WHO GON' PAY FOR ALL MAH KEEDS? WHO GON' PAY FER ALL MAH KEEEDS?"
You. you, you dumb bitch. You and the bastard who spawned them. The government no longer needs to be involved in you or your spawns life. You'll provide for them or you'll go to prison while the state raises them, where you'll never get access to dick to pop out any mor until they turn 18.

Secondly, I'd try to increase human longevity. If it involves tweaking peoples telomere caps like Naked Mole Rats so they just physically never run out of the ability to renew themselves or mutate in ways that'd result in cancer, so be it. With people able to be more healthy for longer, it's suddenly less important to breed immediately until you have the wealth and establishment and resources to afford it

Thirdly, I'd incentivize athletes and geniuses to donate genetic material. Not to breed super babies, but for gene editing. A super cardio athlete and a family that has a curious penchant for certain forms of savant syndrome may be fun to record and experiment with. If certain genes or combinations/expressions are just plain superior, then there's no reason they couldn't benefit the already existent populations already existing genes. Suddenly inheritance jumps to near 100%

(continued)
So this way you have the inarguably more superior bone structures, organs, immune systems, brains for all manner of intelligences, all forms of health, being distributed across the entire population within the same generation.

Now you don't even need to worry about stupid people overbreeding like rabbits, or accidentally breeding. You can make sure people breed only when they have the resources to do so, and if they don't have them, they can pay for it with their freedom. That'll put a massive damper on how often they can do so.

And you make sure that the people that should be breeding will have good incentive to do so. People that can afford to raise their own offspring into privilege and education and comfort. Ensuring that intelligent, even tempered people are the ones that wind up more likely to pass on their genes than idiots who do nothing but shoot up drugs and fire out babies.

At what age do you start to pay women to not have children? If you wait until 18 there’s still going to be tens of thousands of cases of teenage pregnancies in the inner cities

>Implementation of policy
Not Veeky Forums

>99% of america lost user
your worse than papa cortez

Girls young enough to menstruate are young enough to use birth control.

The allowance the state would pay females to keep their uterus off limits to sperm is a pitance to the humanitarian crisis that comes from unwanted pregnancies and adoptions.

Oh. And.

In this theoretical future, a device exists for women. It's a simple chair. It provides T-ray, ultrasound and similar exams daily. Harmless, non-invasive. This chair would enable women to detect zygotes and embryos within the first few weeks of fertilization and implantation, with a monitor to offer 3d modeled view of it.

It would therefor be virtually impossible to not know until it's too late to abort, allowing any woman to use the Plan B birth control to be rid of unwanted spawn.

And most men aren't trying to knock a bitch up anyway, so that reversible plug in the seminal vesicles that they are paid for prevents them from being able to do so. All available sources of dick the scheming bitch is most likely to land on will shoot blanks.

Listen dude...

Paying every single American to not have kids would cost WAY fucking more than is currently paid to kids on welfare. In fact, child-based welfare is a miniscule portion of the national budget.

Evenly distribute money and seize the means boi

OP wants a utopia but everyone wants free market; who will win, the bourgeoisie and capitalist, or utopian socialist idealist and the working class?

>Most men are not trying to knock a bitch up anyway

I’m assuming you’re either a female or gay because that’s literally the opposite of how the male mind works. I can’t even count how many Genghis Khan-esque wet dreams I’ve had where I’ve walked across thousands of miles impregnating every woman in sight and spreading my superior seed

Why not both?? With AI and automation taking the place of most lower and middle class jobs in the future there will be no need for an underclass. Everyone not of productive use will be sterilized and the remaining humans of society will all live comfortable upper class lives. Communism AND the elimination of the so-called “working class”

Is jesse lee peterson mentally challenged? He sounds like it but I haven't found anything conclusive

>Forced sterilization
But what about basic human rights?

I'm guessing you lived in a segregated neighborhood or town your whole life. That's how the average 85-IQ black man talks. Jesse simply tries to steer away from using ebonics and is redpilled on certain subjects

But then theres deciding if theyre useful/productive or not, how do we know who to sterilize? I could have gotten unlucky in the capitalist state, forcing me to do grunt work. When AI takes over am I deemed useless, and sterilized, even if I was where i was just because I was unlucky? Or is everyone put through testing? Idk seems like theres a lot of things you have to work out.

sounds like a pretty shit society to me

Eugenics is pointless due to genetic engineering.

...

Human rights became a meme the day shithole countries started dominating human rights organizations
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Human_Rights_Council

>Responds to a most X are not Y claim with a personal anecdote that they are X and simultaneously also Y.
QED

>human rights are a meme because of the UN

But eugenics won't increase iq.
So what's the point?

Shhhhhh eugenics aren't for increasing IQ they are for removing undesirables.

Lets kill and or undermine all that are in favor of genocide and or mass undermining.

>Human rights exist even when they arent enforced.

You would save more money in the long run brainlet. Obviously it would cost more on the short term, nobody is denying that.

It's your parents fault

>Programs which literally raise IQ will somehow not raise IQ

Really makes you think

It won't though. If you want enough humans to breed to actually maintain the species you can't just breed geniuses. What you'll end up with is a potentially slightly raised average IQ and practically no variance. Certainly no more geniuses.

If it were a gradual climb of average IQ it would be incredibly beneficial to society. Think about ancient Europeans; The average IQ could have been 40-80 for all we know. The ice age comes and all the megatards who eat all their food right away starve to death. The people with +/- 100IQ knew how to horde their food and they now become the ones with average IQ. The human species is now better off.

I obviously have no idea about IQ measurements of the past, just an theoretical example though that is likely true to an extent which is why people from regions that experience winters have higher IQ than people closer to the equator