Chalmers had a real mind-boggler: "We're not going to get conclusive proof that we're not in a simulation...
By your definition the Christian Godhead itself isn't "God".
Putting a fully sentient being into such a crude world would probably qualify as some kind of hell.
Holy shit would you fuck back to plebbit already
There are things like Planck length and Planck time, which are clearly hard coded limitations of the engine. Planck time represents the tick rate of the universe, and Planck length represents the floating point accuracy of location. We are obviously living in a simulation. When you die, you will wake up in a game arcade and remove the virtual helmet from your head. Your friends will laugh at you for getting the lowest score anyone has ever seen.
>We told you not to pick a NEET faggot, stupid
You will, however, set an unbreakable record for the time spent masturbating to tentacle porn. You hope your friends won't notice that.
>By your definition the Christian Godhead itself isn't "God".
Hardly surprising, since I'm not a Christian.
As a deist, _my_ (unfalsifiable) belief is that God is the supreme divine being, creator (or whatever) of ALL universes, not just this one.
But I don't really see where that idea is incompatible with the doctrines of the Christian faith.
Sure, I don't support most church doctrine, but I don't see where they wouldn't like my definition of God.
BTW: "Funerals are for the living". The point of faith isn't whether or not God actually exists. The point is the impact faith has on your life, no matter how unfounded it is.
It seems to me that such a being would be so detached, omniscient, omnipotent and unhuman that it would be completely pointless to worship or even acknowledge them.
You may as well start calling the fine structure constant "Arnold" and insist that it's a God.
This relies on the assumption that the universe was necessarily created by God
>completely pointless to worship or even acknowledge them.
Yeah, I really doubt the point of worship is to stroke God's ego.
It seems pretty obvious the point is to create a structure for the clergy to control the masses for their own personal gain.
But "acknowledge"? Again, the point of faith is how it affects you, not whether you get to be "right" about something you can't even begin to prove.
>You may as well start calling the fine structure constant "Arnold" and insist that it's a God.
If that helps you cope with life better, go for it.
Except the "insist" part, that doesn't sound healthy.
Even as a deist, I don't insist God must exist, neither to myself nor to others.
why hasnt anyone assassinated that fuck yet?