How can we rationalize infinity?
Infinity
Sebastian Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
vixra.org
twitter.com
Nicholas Price
If there exists no maximal real number [math]\stackrel{max}{\mathbb{R}} [/math] equal to infinity, there exists no minimus real number [math]\stackrel{min}{\mathbb{R}} [/math] equal to zero.
If there exists no maximal real number that is identifiable to be 1 element less than infinity, there exists no minimus real number that is identifiable to be 1 element greater than zero.
If there is no singular discernable maximal real number that is 1 element less than infinity, there exists no singular discernable maximal real number that is solely less than infinity. Any real number is less than infinity.
If there is no singular discernable minimus real number that is 1 element greater than 0, there exists no singular discernable minimus real number that is solely greater than 0. Any real number is greater than 0.
No matter how big a number sums, it never equals infinity. No matter how small a fractional decimal can divide into, it never equals 0.
Because there exists no minimus real number equal to zero, nor any boundary for a least significant minimus real number which can be greater than 0, [math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n} \neq 1 [/math]
At no point in the sum will there ever exist an insignificant decimal place, and any real amount of 9's in the repetition will never be an infinite amount of 9's. At every point in the sum, will require addition of a minimal number to sum 1, such that
[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \Bigg[ \frac{9}{10^n} + \big( \rlap{no}{\sum} \frac{1}{10^n} \big) \Bigg] = 1 [/math]
Liam Peterson
it was already done by my man cantor
Samuel Perry
just do ((infinity + 1) - 1) * ((infinity + 1) + 1) / ((infinity + 1) + 1)
Xavier Cooper
Just take the square root of your mom's weight and you have infinity.
Alexander Williams
infinity is real fuckin big dude like wtf go get laid this shit dont matter what are you gay
David Rogers
Infinity is the Dedekind cut consisting of all rationals. Negative infinity, on the other hand, is the Dedekind cut consisting of the empty set. That's it.
Jace Peterson
it like just goes on forever man
Kayden Morgan
Logan Nelson
>numpherphile
>gene doubled retards
Jayden Flores
lol nerd tl:dr
Carter Myers
don't judge a book by its cover
they're interviewing a real mathematician instead of goofing off themselves
Justin Brown
infinity is how many natural numbers there are
Owen Turner
so infinity is only 10^200?
David Gutierrez
10^200+1
Daniel Lewis
that's a dark number
Nathan Cooper
>applying or discussing infinity at all
Bentley Bailey
>How can we rationalize infinity?
with a framework of transfinite analysis, duh
check out my new book which contains one such framework
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>vixra.org
Jayden Jackson
Oh i understand shes a real mathematician. Real mathematicians never understand what they're talking about.
This is her video
>[math]\mathbb{N} = \big[ 0,1,2,3,..., n \big] [/math] is all numbers
>[math]\mathbb{N*} = \big[ k, k+1, k+2... \big] [/math] is all other numbers greater than n
Mathematicians are stammering bumblefucking retards and women are especially less intelligent than men.
Elijah Foster
it go but it don't stop
Kevin Roberts
...