Has the Stirner meme died?

Yes

In fact ancaps are the most spooked because of their non aggression pact bullshit and all that they really believe people will abide to

I'm fine with considering all these spooks.

My GF is suffocating me. She only visits on the weekend but her kid doesn't stop til 1 oclock. She says "If things are moving too fast just say something' and will go ahead and make plans for our future and any objection is just dismissive and disguised as encouragement. "You are nothing like your father, you'll be a good dad" last weekend after she went to bed I drank six white russians so I'd wake up at the toilet and she'd leave. No. She did not. She sat there and babysat me.

No it isn't and Max Stirner was a socialist who hung around with a bunch of proto-Marxists. The difference between the overwhelming majority of socialists and Max Stirner is most socialists think you can only achieve socialism through government. Max Stirner thought the workers needed to recognise their own egoism, and if they did so they'd abstain from the corrupt system which exploited them, which they only adhered to because of spooks like nationalism and duty and obligation. You're an illiterate pleb for not understanding Stirner even slightly. Consider killing yourself.

wow, you're bad at egoism

This is precisely I feel like Stirner's work never grew that big. It's a giant middle finger to literally everyone. (That's kind of what's most loveable about it, though, imo)

How is consent a spook?

Lol he literally spends like 100 pages dissing socialists which you would know if you read the book.

He got killed due to retards saying things like spooks are spooks lmao without having read his work.

Why do you need consent? Because someone else told you that you need it.

spoogs :DDDDD

It's not consent that's the spook, it's the idea of needing consent that's the spook.

Does anyone that memes Stirner actually read his writings?

I literally said "need consent", what are you on about?

he just wanted to feel superior to someone, particualrly a strawman.
It's a classic Veeky Forums technique.

Meant to reply to the post you were replying to.

s-sorry

That's ok we all make mistakes

Shut up nerd I've read the book, you didn't say needing consent you said consent, if consent is a spook then the whole union of egoists doesn't work idiot.

>Asked him about Max Stirner:
>Chomsky: Never followed his work carefully

How can anyone recover from Stirner?

There is nothing to recover from.

Once you understand Stirner, you're at the peak of ideologies.

Chomskys a big ol ideologue so I can see why

He shits on socialists, but not socialism. Remember socialism at this time was pretty different to what it is today -- it wasn't dominated by Marx's huge dick. Stirner truly does advocate for something near to socialism, or at least anti-capitalist. The main difference is he thinks each individual should seek all property, rather than The Working Class owning the means of production.
Almost, but not quite. Stirner is the last step; past him there are no steps...you must learn to fly...

whoa

I do love this thinking.

"Socialism won't work because muh human nature but everyone will gladly agree to not fuck those weaker than them in the ass and take their shit".

>using the fact he hung out with the Left Hegelians as evidence he was a socialist when his magnum opus is devoted to shitting on the Left Hegelians

No he's not

*writes 100 books on why da USA is so bad.

>he literally spends like 100 pages dissing socialists
He does this precisely because he is a socialist. We're most at odds with people closest to us in opinion. Look at the absolute fucking state of Islam right now or previous centuries of Christianity. It would be like saying Adolf Hitler wasn't a Nazi because he spends large chunks of Mein Kampf attacking other members of the NSDAP. Lucky for you, reading comprehension and critical thinking are spooks.