MUSK FUCKS UP

>FH is literally a better rocket for Moon missions than BFR.
Since when did FH have the capacity to do a full manned moon mission (that wouldn't be stranded) in one shot?

>what is launching in multiple parts?

safer, too. you distribute the risk.

The fuck is this low grade memery? It takes more than a day to get to Mars. Not to mention, Elon never intended to land the Falcon Heavy test payload on Mars. If what you posted was true (its not) it would mean Elon successfully achieved his goal in an amount of time previously deemed impossible.

>It takes more than a day to get to Mars

No shit, Sherlock

Did you look at OPs picture? I dont do twitter but either that image is fake or OP is ripping on Musk for a failure that hasn’t happened.

It is real, that is the projected trajectory Musk posted on Twitter: twitter.com/elonmusk

There's nothing wrong with it and OP is just being a troll or retard. Probably both.

newshub.co.nz/home/world/2018/02/elon-musk-s-spacex-car-mission-overshoots-mars-orbit.html
>mfw news outlets report the orbit as a failure instead of the success it was
Fucking fake news.

spacex is shit, cant even get the planet right.

next thing you know nasa comissions a mars base and they end up colonizing alpha centauri. what a bunch of amateurs

Moon missions could be done using 2 FHs (reusable) and 1 F9 (reusable.)

BFR would require 4-9 refueling flights in order to land on the moon and return with no additional hardware.

The point was less get to mars and more to show off what the upper stage can do. If it can put a car in the belt it can stick a spy sat in GEO.

I'm disappointed they didn't announce where it would be visible from. My brother was outside and caught it. If I had known ahead of time I could have seen it.