So I realize I myself am not an expert in photography

So I realize I myself am not an expert in photography.

However, I cannot reconcile why no stars are visible. I realized that the common explanation is that the camera is adjusting for the brightness of everything else including the globe

But even I can see at least one star, even when standing in the middle of Times Square at night you can make out at least one. Anyway I figured I would educate myself before going full-blown conspiracy. I'm sure I will get a bunch of hateful comments though. But thank you to those who actually read and comment here.

Other urls found in this thread:

himawari8.nict.go.jp/
youtube.com/watch?v=cjClTnZ4Xh4
youtube.com/watch?v=OmcwW-8CC6E
youtube.com/watch?v=SznaMGoMR9Q
youtube.com/watch?v=2McHJP2kjGs
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

stars are incredibly, incredibly hard to see with most cameras at normal exposures, almost every picture or video you see involving stars is because it's a timelapse with longer exposure times. Also note that this is streamed so there's some good compression on that footage. When the 5k raw footage gets uploaded directly you -might- see jupiter, maybe.

modern video cameras just suck cock in low light, that's how it is

Okay gotcha, I guess I have never used any serious photography equipment. I just know that if I take my cold first generation smartphone outside and take a picture of the sky they will come out just fine. And compression I suppose could factor in you may know more than me, I just don't see how. But I do appreciate your comment. I will have to look more into that I have become quite curious since I saw this.

> I just know that if I take my cold first generation smartphone outside and take a picture of the sky they will come out just fine
bullshit. post a pic. i guarantee you'd only see jupiter and even then, only with like a full second exposure

FTFY

M*

Well I know for a fact that I have seen more than Jupiter, I'm not going to post a pic because, well because I'm far too lazy mainly. But you could still be right who knows maybe it was a freak picture. If this thread go somewhere I will dig it up.

you might have been seeing some stuff that wasn't stars in the pic, like landing jets which have incredibly bright lights that are way brighter than even jupiter from tens of miles away

That could be a possibility. I'm quite positive they were stars as there were hundreds of them and, well pretty star-like. Not being facetious, I will actually try and upload it. I have to charge this old piece of junk first the battery never works. One sec

Kek, look at this good goy working so very hard to maintain his masters tricks.

Face it, there are no actual pictures of the world that aren't composites. And don't link me that geosynchronous orbit or satellite that supposedly gives real-time pictures. It's literally 240p pixelated garbage that still looks photoshopped. You know what I would do if I wanted to limit all pictures of the world? I would make sure that no pictures were received from any of the Thousand satellites out there safe but one. And on that one satellite I would make it shity as hell and as far away as possible, like where geosynchronous orbit supposedly is.

Even if you showed this guy your picture off your phone, it wouldn't make him budge in the slightest. People like this are absolutely set in their ways and thinking outside the box is simply not possible anymore.

can't tell if flat earther or just denying this particular instance