Guys, intellectually I'm all spooked out. I can't stand philosophy because of all the unfalsifiable garbage...

Guys, intellectually I'm all spooked out. I can't stand philosophy because of all the unfalsifiable garbage. Many fields like economics etc are just applied common sense and stamp collecting. I see novels as nothing but entertainment despite pretentious people claiming life / philosophical insights and tonnes of people will consider you a disgusting plebeian if you don't initially read shitloads of boring as fuck canon novels.

I think I am painfully adapting to the idea of the Internet age / information overload by abandoning any pretension that I can be an all rounder or even dilettante in everything. There are ten trillion books called "Introduction to [broad and important field]", even if you only have one of each field.

History is similar to novels. Shitloads of reading along with a shitload pretension thrown on top telling you that you truly cannot no nuthin unless you have an in depth understanding of the Greeks / Romans / Christianity / USA / WW1 / WW2 / financial systems / or shitloads of other topics I can't stand it. And then there's current events. I don't care about climate change, outer space, inequality, China, the EU, applied psychology, the education system, diversity, Russia, South America, refugees, nutrition, mental health, and more. Admitting just one of these would make me an iredeemable idiot, no doubt.

Has anyone else had similar thoughts? The spooks are powerful and must be removed but their removal leaves your mind in a promordial state that is more susceptible to spooks than before.

I go to the city centre and see people shopping and the streets are busy, which is comforting compared to when they're empty, but walking through then brings no epiphanies.

I am so past watching movies or tv shows, even ones that pander to "edgy" young males. I just about read books but only because society tells me I should, though I don't derive much enjoyment

And obviously I have an existential crisis but Veeky Forums is fucking pathetic in demanding that anyone who has one should immediately "grow up" and become a monotheist and wagecuck. I fucking hate wagecucking. Seeing attractive young people is humiliating. I tell myself every day that I'll soon work intensely on one thing but I can't bear to do this. If you're really good at one thing then there are people lining up to call you a tard for not watching opera or being able to run a marathon or whatever shit. So I do nothing.

Every "thinker" is at their core an utter fucking fraud. Nietzche is a Tony Robbins tier Rorschach test. Science and mathematics provide non trivial insights but only in ultra specialised ways that probably require autism to appreciate. I listen to In Our Time podcasts and Bret Easton Ellis podcasts and I think at heart everyone cares about nothing more than social drama.

I think we all need to man up and admit that money, youth, videogames, and good looks are as good as it gets. But not everyone gets.

I too love pasta.

I've always appreciated how more is added to this meme every time it's posted.

I know this is a copypasta but this is really how I feel, is there something wrong with me?
Also my sides @ that filename, well played OP

>I know this is a copypasta but this is really how I feel, is there something wrong with me?
It's nothing wrong, but you're a meme.

An excerpt from Bret Easton Ellis' next novel? If so, then it's his best prose yet.

The fundamental truth of God is that his character is love. Act out his character and become the hand of God on earth.

Figure out the world from this point.

Is sex God?

>Science and mathematics provide non trivial insights
kek.

meant to reply to

Sex and love are different. Whom ever skewed the definitions doesn't want love perpetuated.

What's the difference, then?

giving without expectation

But they aren't separate. Sex leads to love, and love leads to sex.

i'm not satisfied with my response

I personally feel there is a difference but some people may "make love"...

just stick with acting out a character of love and look for that in a partner

Maybe stop caring so much what other people think about you. All of that seemed to be oriented around the perception of you as an intellectual rather than what you actually like.

You seem to have identity issues. Maybe you would benefit from some therapy.

>therapy
I swear to god, every time someone even mentions therapy I cringe inside, knowing it's some kind of reddit liberal prescribing you this.

>I think we all need to man up and admit that money, youth, videogames, and good looks are as good as it gets.
This, but unironically

OP needs to have sex.

Empty consumption, just like fastfood.

>sex
>the answer to any problem at all

>therapy.
loooooooooooool

I feel you, OP

>chilling with friends
>put morton feldman's second string quartet
>confront myself and my self (as an ontological historical entity) with the mirror of atonality (as a mirror is not an empathic but a reflexive entity, alien to the space and time it reflects and only existing by itself in relation to the other) and realize the boundaries of human thought, comprehension and consciousness
>reach rational ecstasy
>pleb friend gets up and says "what is this silence shit, lmao, put some nirvana"
>get angry at their rockist subaltern consumption conditioned by the structures of power of the imperialist white economies, but contain it
>calm myself down by remembering quotes from finnegans wake, my favorite book since i was a teenager
>mfw can't express myself because i'm a spectator in the society of spectacle

"It is not the slumber of reason which engenders monsters, but vigilant and insomniac rationality. - Gilles Deleuze" - ~Astigmata

This is beautiful

There is literally nothing else in the universe that has meaning that can be partaken of by humans.

And your daily masturbation is what? Michelin 3 Star cuisine?

Not fapping since september 2015 ;)

I have castrated myself to rebeal against society, btw, do you like chimps?

this thread is funny

You haven't passed on your genes and fulfilled your ultimate purpose in the universe? So billions of years of cosmic creation and evolution and struggle against the tyranny of death, millions of your ancestors bless and died to bring life to you, all the living organisms of the world living in symphonic chaotic ecstasy with the soul reason of existing to pass on the secrets and miracle of life and you fail at your only reason to exist. Sounds like the genetic future of mankind has been improved.

>but you're a meme.
what does that mean?

All thinkers are frauds. Some of their thoughts are not. Your responsibility is to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Bait. Nobody can resist furious masturbation on the anniversary of 9/11.

spook central

>2017
>teleological view of nature
lmaoing @ your cognitive capacities, senpai

Why is philosophy a thing? The world just keeps going and doing whatever it wants, no one cares if some academic thinks something is good or bad or if it fits some kind of system of beliefs, is all impulse

Yes, reproduction (the driving force of all biological existence) is terrifyingly spooky to the perma-virgins on this board.

and who cares about biological bla bla bla
dude stop trying to fight nihilism, is fucking over, this is a POST-apocalyptic world

>tfw too smart to be smart

what this guy said.
>2017
>trying to guilt people into reproducing through giving analogies like WUHH everyone did it MAN u GOTTA DO IT TOOOOOOOOOOO WOWI WOWO SOCIETY TELLS U OBEY ME

>1859+158
>searching for some other meaning to existence deeper than genetic duplication.

You are the spooked man my fellow.

You

What is the purpose of genetic duplication?

>guilt
Nobody mentioned guilt. Self Extinction of such a failed genetic line will only benefit everyone. Society should applaud a living being who cannot even understand the function of his body for not taking up more resources and removing itself from the future. Failed genes tend not be passed down. Lucky for us all that includes most the people here.

The utterings of an ego. (you)

Fighting entropy. Genetic reproduction is only reason you have came into existence so you can whine and cry and say that you dont understand why you exist. (hint, its to pass on your genes).

>Thinking reproduction is purpose of life
You are like a babby in thinking, but keep going, you're not there yet.

I know this is pasta but it still really connects with me. Every time I try to get into serious novels, or even light entertainment, I feel like I am forcing myself to care about something. It seems like there is really no significant insight to be gleamed from any serious art and it's all just pretentious semantics.

The complaint of a neurotic biological and existential dead end.

But the academics can affect politicians and start movements. The philosophy of the enlightenment lead to the American and French revolutions for instance.

>worshiping biology
nerd

Lets here your spooky explanation for your existence. I can demonstrate objectively the existence of all life stemming from exclusively biological factors and continuing primarily through genetic selection. But let me hear your version of how we all got here.

There's nothing else pal. Reproduction is the begging and end of our entire existence. All your hand wringing and worrying and searching for meaning in life is misplaced.

That's because you are forcing yourself to do things you don't want to do. Go back to playing in the mud with the other children until you realize you want something more.

There's so much wrong with your way of thinking that i'm cringing knowing that you're probably some fedora guy being smug behind his pc when irl ure some skinny shit who needs to have some kind of validation because he doesn't get that IRL.

First off, you should learn to be more dialectical in your arguments and recognize that any discussion should be held simply as a form of transportation to the truth.

If you're in college or college age: this is, sadly, still very common among college students who think they're smarter than all of their peers. It's sad that you haven't addressed it already, and I'm sure that you've lost friends over it, assuming you made any. I would make it a priority to either,
A) accept that you're not as smart as you think you are,
or B) if you're actually very intelligent, you should stop letting your arrogance cloud your logic - put your intelligence into areas where you will help yourself in the long run, and try to avoid making yourself out to be an intellectual.

If you're out of college or past college age: I don't really know what to say, except that most people probably don't like you because of the way you act, and I would encourage you to try and change that.

You have another ideal for all the living organism of the earth to pattern thier behavior? All living cells should stop trying to secure survival, food, shelter from harm, and optimal reproductive success and instead devote the entirety of its energy and focus to the self conscious mental masturbation of your own search for something deeper?

Last time I checked, humans got consciousness, and they can decide what their life purpose is for themselves.

nature is not goal-oriented, you cuck
the way things are right now doesn't inform us at all regarding how they ought to be. it's just an arrangement out of many that were possible [via natural selection]

>people probably don't like you
I can tell I'm alot older than you because that's not even a consideration. You didn't offer one word of counter argument. I am actually engaging dialectically. You are offering a projection of your own fears because you dont have a refutation other than attaching my ethos which you know nothing of.

Pass on your genes or your existence had zero meaning. Please demonstrate how my logic is flawed. I have struggled with existentialism for more than half my life which is probably more years than most of your life.

What would be the reason your biological evolution lead to consciousness if not to enhance you chances at reproduction. You think biological selection favors superfluous traits that do not enhance reproduction chances? Or do you believe in some magical source of consciousness like God or ancient aliens?

>Pass on your genes or your existence had zero meaning.
>Please demonstrate how my logic is flawed.

Your "logic" is fundamentally flawed. You perceive existence under false pretenses and ironically contradict yourself by ascribing meaning to chaos while ridiculing others for doing the same.

>Pass on your genes or your existence had zero meaning.
Zero meaning according to what? Society?

I think every birth and death is a beautiful experience, and every experience has meaning.
According to you, nutting inside a woman so she can create another human is all the difference it takes for your life to be meaningful?
Then your view of life is very damn sad. Sex isn't everything, grow up. The purpose of life isn't procreation, that's the purpose of nature.
Life has no inherent meaning so far as we can tell.

Did you even read what biological evolution is? Evolution doesn't adapt life according to their environment. Evolution is rather glitches/accidents in nature that slightly changed traits in animals and that resulted in them being able to survive better, so those glitched animals created more babies, etc etc. It's not like a vinetree that just grows and holds on to everything to get further. There's no real progress or goal in evolution.

I am not ascribing a goal to nature, I am defining the sole nature of biologic existence as reproduction. Its not a goal, its the singular demonstrable meaning for why living creatures exist. Consciousness and looking inward do not somehow create more meaning any more than staring into a hall of mirrors creates multiple versions of you.

>Be enlightened anti-natalist
>Want to have a cute daughter


How do you deal with these feelings?

Fix your life, stop wasting it away on the internet you fucking idiot.

Pedophile detected.

mental gymnastics can't change what you're trying to say: that we exist in order to reproduce, therefore it's our GOAL to reproduce

Your existence is inextricably intertwined to the fundamental forces of nature. There is nothing that happens or doesn't happen except by the mechanisms of nature. Why do you try and separate your consciousness from that? What other rational basis do we have to draw our conclusions about existence? A meaning to life? If that's what you think exists, where do you seek it? If you say outside yourself than where? If you say inside yourself, well you are simply a product of biological processes, including your consciousness. There is no mysterious source of meaning. You need to grow up and face reality. Look at the actual history of life and the universe your books and your diary and all your self worship of your intellect have no consequences existentially. Your existence is solely due to biological reproduction and that is all you have to contribute. Your intelligence could be used to enhance your chances and the chances of your offspring and make a better species but you waste it and spin your wheels searching for something else deeper. Scratch the surface of existence and there is only entropy and non existence any deeper. The nihilism of anti-reproduction is astoundingly complete, but devoid of any meaning.

Goal and meaning are separate words because they have different definitions. Goal requires the intention of cognition, in this case "goal of reproduction" but we were talking about the meaning of life. A meaning is an inherent property of something that is objectively independent of conscious subjectivity. If there is a meaning to life it is the reproduction and continuation of life. If you want to set a goal for your life it should be informed by the inherent meaning of life. If you have something else that your divinely appointment intellect has discovered I would like to know what it is.

>make a better species
Wait, what? Where is this shit coming from? What exactly do you mean by that? What "makes a better species" if not art and introspection? Wings? A prehensile tail?

Also you say
>Your existence is solely due to biological reproduction and that is all you have to contribute.
And yet simultaneously talk about using our intellect to "better our offspring and species". What's the point of intelligence if the goal of life is fucking? Smart people use condoms.

Why is intelligence special anyway? Nobody is allowed to look introspectively, but math is ok?
>There is nothing that happens or doesn't happen except by the mechanisms of nature.
>Why do you try and separate your consciousness from that?
Why indeed.

I think is the opposite, the biological goal of life is to reproduce (which in reality is more of an inclination rather than a goal) but the meaning in itself varies from individual to individual, if someone doesn't reproduce but is able to find a task for himself then he will have both a meaning and a goal, you are giving the human perceived values of life to everyone

Certain traits could improve the population's chances of continued survival while simultaneously reducing the probability of the individual who possesses said trait reproducing.

Meaning in this sense implies action or disposition towards action; it implies a goal. If someone says the meaning of life is to be happy, it implies you should pursue happiness through your actions. If you say the meaning of biological existence is reproduction you're implying a *goal* of perpetuating life. There's really no way around it
Also, trying to ascribe any meaning (rationality) to nature is also fucking retarded spooky shit that verges on religion. Do you believe nature has consciousness? Do you believe the universe was designed?

>What "makes a better species"

Higher chances of survival, stronger and more robust individuals with better, more competitive traits. If creating set can inspire that then it serves the biological imperative. If wings are required for survival than we can and have created them for competitive advantage.

>the goal of life is fucking
The goal of life is not fucking. There is no goal of life. The meaning of life is reproduction. The goal of fucking is reproduction. Any other goal or lack of a goal for fucking is degenerate and self defeating nihilism.

>robust individuals with better, more competitive traits
lol that's not what evolution does, if the medium requires for meek quiet individuals then natural selection make the vigorous ones dissappear, now we as human have the capability of manipulating the medium to a certain extent, that's where our individual or societal values come into play which are not always in line with reproduction as the ultimate goal

>There is no goal of life
>The meaning of life is reproduction
oh my god, you're so fucking stupid

So a "better species" is one with the most progeny. That's all it takes? It almost works out if you don't think about it too hard, I see why you like this idea so much.

Except for one glaring flaw: what do you propose all of these people do? Do you think society can exist without introspection? Without having to ask some questions about what is right or wrong? What is allowed and what is forbidden?
People will be everywhere, but without conscious thinking about ourselves and other abstractions we will be apes without tails.
>There is no goal of life.
>The meaning of life is reproduction.
LOL, you are splitting hairs. I don't care if you are a troll or not it's fun reading your stupid responses.

I am saying that the meaning of life is reproduction. I am not saying everyone needs to have that goal. Everyone is free to have whatever goals they want. But that does not then imbue life with new multitudes of inherent meanings based on everyone's different goals. A person should seek the optimal chances for reproduction for them and thier offspring. That is the meaning of life. Everything else is existentially meaningless. You can give everything else personal meaning of you like. I like landscape photography and playing musical instruments. But those things are not the meaning of life no mater how ardently I pursue them as my goals in life.

>A person should seek the optimal chances for reproduction for them
>I am not saying everyone needs to have that goal
This is some really astounding level of cognitive dissonance
Reflect during a few minutes on what people mean when they say "The meaning of life is x"

Goal and meaning are separate words for a reason. They have different definitions. You should start there and then reread everything else.

>most
Not the most progeny, the BEST progeny. All art, science, intelligence, and society should serve that goal. For the betterment of mankind and a more capable and productive (reproductive) species.

So far I am the only one positing a proposed meaning of life. The rest is nihilistic "whoa is us, life is meaningless" circle jerk.

Should and need(must) are different words for a reason.

"The meaning of life is X" is a teleological statement"; itt implies a system of belief oriented towards a goal. If you say "the meaning of life is happines" you're basically saying "your goal in life is to achieve optimal happinness". You could hold that belief and still act against it, but it's still a teleological statement.

Nature has no goals, final purpose or meaning. Its an arrangement that grew out of the environment. Natural selection doesn't imply teleology

Who cares? What I'm trying to get through your thick skull is that there's no purpose (intentionality) behind nature

Thank you, captain obvious. You're still making a statement regarding the purpoted goal of life.

>Not the most progeny, the BEST progeny
You should actually read up on evolutionary biology. Define "BEST" progeny and how that differs from just having the most that survive.

>All art, science, intelligence, and society should serve that goal. For the betterment of mankind and a more capable and productive (reproductive) species.
And now you are backpedaling.

Using your own argument why should society/science/art exist at all? What's the point of building a skyscraper if all we need to do is reproduce? Why should I look at art if all I need to do is raise a family?

Do you even have an idea of what types of society/science/art we "should" be creating? A utilitarian's utopia?

>why should society/science/art exist at all?
Because those things increase the chances of our reproduction and the survival and genetic reproduction of our young. Why do you think those things exist?

>Why do you think those things exist?
You are correct in saying they exist to enhance our survival, but what do you think made that all possible? Introspection. Creating abstract concepts and making them concrete. You can call anyone from almost anywhere on the planet, but that doesn't help anyone reproduce.

>all this fight because I pretended to be Adam Lanza
I'm sorry anons

>Nature has no goals, final purpose or meaning. Its an arrangement that grew out of the environment
But we have intellect that allows us to see what the process of life is and has been. We can learn from the massive success of biological life over the last billion years and use our intelligence to emulate its processes and further our biological advancement by setting goals informed by that success and process. Continual improvement requires successive generations to carry out. Each generation has a higher chance of success if they are more capable and intelligent than the previous. The meaning of life is to create more life. Since we have the ability to set goals, our goal should be to create the best possible life for each new generation. There is nothing more important we can contribute to the future than better individuals than ourselves. Equipped with he best science and art we can give them so that they can continue the process. Self indulgent anti-natalism does not progress anything.

>You can call anyone from almost anywhere on the planet, but that doesn't help anyone reproduce.
It does infact help certain individuals reproduce if global communication is a factor in thier mating needs, such as long distance relationships. But more importantly it helps protect and enhance the survival and abilities of our offspring. Faster communication of life saving information for example and greater awareness of ideas and information that increase the next generations ability to advance as a species and reproduce an even greater and more capable offspring than they.

>Nature has no goals, final purpose or meaning
Even a prima facie meaning of biological life would be most essentially be understood as self replication. What is biological life? Organisms that recreate themselves continuously. Are you a biological organism? If yes, then your goal seems fairly simply handed down to you.

>teleological
Luckily "Don't have babies because life sucks" isn't teleological

>It does infact help certain individuals reproduce if global communication is a factor in thier mating needs, such as long distance relationships
Wow you beat me, this one extra-specific exception has foiled all the other points you conveniently ignored. Also, doesn't it occur to you that those very circumstances are created when people are thinking and acting outside of nature? What's the point of a long distance relationship, or any relationship for that matter? I assume you meant a monogamous relationship, but there is nothing wrong with polygamy, or some communal type child-rearing if everyone is on the same page as your ideology basically demands.

>Wow you beat me, this one
If you have other examples for me to refute I would be happy to oblige. Reproduction and survival of our offspring, to some extent is the driving factor in human endeavors including art and science. Behind every artist, scientist, politician, warlord, and peace activist is a society that wants to have sex, wants to produce children, and wants those children to survive and surpass them in all areas of those endeavors. Just because you have lost sight of the obvious meaning of our existence does not mean it is not engrained biologically and socially into the fabric of our existence. You can fight against it, but you are fighting nature, for what? Non-existence? Seems silly to me.

You didn't even read my whole post did you? Maybe you ignored it on purpose so you wouldn't have to admit how fundamentally flawed and child-like your beliefs are.

You really think everyone who doesn't agree with your naivety is a self-defeating "nihilist" (as you so inaccurately put it)? I don't think YOU know what you actually believe in. Most of your argument is backpedaling or contradictory, you are obviously making this up one sentence at a time.

So far the one concrete thing you've stuck to is "people want to reproduce", which is not very captivating.

I have an IQ of 147, kiddo
Arguing against me is useless

oh the feel when kiddo unironically believes this

EEeeeeEeeEe!!

> le "i must procreate to live forever" meme

>What would be the reason your biological evolution lead to consciousness if not to enhance you chances at reproduction
making me able to do whatever i want

I have nothing further to add. You dont refute my points you simply attack me and boast about your IQ. I am not a smart man with my measly 129. But I have thought my self into the abyss of abstract meaninglessness before. I chose not to stay there. I found a person to devote my every effort, and with her we made a son to whole we devote our every effort. I look around the world and I see every other creature doing the same in one form or another. Why I should have stayed alone for so long and turned away my feelings for her so I could search for something deeper is beyond me. For more than 10 years I kept away from the woman I knew I would marry and give children so that I could feel different than society and live my own life. But there is nothing to live for oneself. There is no meaning inside yourself. There is nothing meaningful in this life except to create more life. Whatever experiences, insights, or knowledge we have are useless unless shared with a new generation. All the art and science mean nothing if there is not a better future for them to thrive in. We cannot just focus on ourselves and our goals when life has so clearly laid out a path for improvement over multiple generations. You will only be able to improve yourself so much. But of we do not pass on those traits and those gains to a new generation its not just biological extinction of your genes but every other aspect of your advancement. I don't want only the stupid people to reproduce. The intelligent, self aware, introspective people cant just give up and say reproduction is dumb. The future of humanity needs those offspring who will ascend even higher and take the next steps. I don't want intelligence to lead to a philosophical and biological dead end where self awareness and consciousness lead to choosing against reproduction. That will lead to a dumber species all together. Choose reproduction. Chose your mate for traits that you want to pass on. Teach that child well and raise them to seek after what you sought. Give them everything you have. The world needs children of your high caliber. Lets not extinct ourselves and intelligence because of existential angst. I nearly did, and I chose to exist and create another who I hope will surpass me. I know you can create an even better person than my son. You dont owe it to the world, but the world will surely be better off. You can call me child like, and we can argue, and I respect your opposition to my ideas, but do not doubt my sincerity. I did nit take the decision to reproduce lightly. Every experience I had told me it would be more than I could handle. And it nearly is most days. But I made a person, and into him I will pour my love of art and my admiration of science and every hope for a brighter future and more powerful and accomplished humanity. I hope he will play a part in that betterment and go beyond where I could. If you have a better meaning for life, I would love to hear about it, but that's all I got for now.