What are some books in which women receive the punish they deserve for being sluts?

How many times have you tried?

Tess

The Sound and the Fury

The problem with guys like you is that you can only look up the social ladder, not down it.

Not him but grills definitely aren't strangers to this

Effi Briest

My Twisted World by St. Elliot Rodger

More so in Claudius the God. The story of Messalina is perhaps the most archetypal female experience. You could read Tacitus as well but this is more entertaining.

The Scarlet Letter

Because you are (far) below the cutoff point.

because either...
1. you never go out and socialize
2. you don't work out
3. you're socially awkward
4. you have bad hygiene

the moar you know

It's a play but Streetcar Named Desire perfectly describes what your looking for.

A protip. Another protip: all of these are things you can change.

if Veeky Forums posters worked on improving these, the place would be 1000% less bitter and less shitty baits

>see OP pic in catalog
>think about how this girl would crumple up so easily with a well delivered blow to the midriff
>see OP subject

When he spits in that girl's face while fucking her.

Brave New World

Why did John slut shame Lenina?

I met my fiance by being a quiet shutin at group therapy and she just approached me and started talking

>4. you have bad hygiene

Oh

Meeting your fiance at therapy sounds like a fantastic idea

at this point as long as they're not obese

mostly 2 and abit of 3

how is that hairstyle called?
the mickey mouse?

just because they are sluts does not mean they sleep with all men.

I don't think all women are sluts but I wish more bitchy characters ended up alone and unhappy or suffering. something like anti "I will be a bitch but nice prince will work hard to win me over because. btw I left my life of privilege to help the sick so you know im not some common born trash"

Most women are whores, not sluts

You're probably a contentedly broke Veeky Forums type. You have nothing to offer most women, who (like most men) just want to have a good time. That involves going out and having fun at restaurants, clubs, concerts, festivals, etc. How rare is it for you to befriend a Veeky Forums type of guy who understands your desires to just read by yourself? That's how rare it is for you to find a woman who's actually attracted to your hobbies. And women who are into Veeky Forums types aren't all just magically attractive; even the few who like you and your interests will likely be bland or outright ugly.

...

Dracula, by Bram Stoker.

The theme of the book is the punishment of women of who explore their sexuality.

Feel free to try and prove me wrong.

I think its about a vampire.

>You probably don't try platitude
>You probably have high standards platitude
>You probably have bad hygiene platitude+ other nonsensical platitudes
This is correct, but not quite there

Real truth is that the value of pussy in the modern age has become ridiculously inflated, while the value of an average dudes dick has plummeted in comparison.
Average men will have a very tough time in today's sexual climate. Women today can browse tinder and pick up a 6'4 handsome, masculine man with the swipe of a finger. Average looking men are simply out of luck, no matter what they do.
To paraphrase 'whatever' by houellebecq, the sexual liberation of the hippie generation didn't make more sex available for everyone. Instead, it created a sexual inequality, where women and highly attractive men have lots of sex, and average and below men get very little to no sex. Monogamy and religion used to act as protectionism for average men; but without regulations, female sexuality is now in command of the marketplace, and they don't want anything except the highest value males.
This is compounded by technology which allows women to pick and choose from a high degree of mates, as well as social attitudes which celebrate female hypergamy while shaming sexually unattractive males.
This is the reality we live in. 'showering' and 'socializing more' won't change subpar genetics.
I was very lucky in that I was born with an attractive face that females like. But my heart goes out to the vast mass of men who will never experience love or intimacy simply because of their genetics. It is a great injustice of our times.

>muh genetics
I thought I wouldn't have to deal with this when I left Veeky Forums, but I guess the merge just diffused the distribution of dweebuses across the two boards.

As far as I can tell, genetics are the most important thing when attracting a mate, and many other aspects of life and how people treat you. Genetics determine how physically attractive you are. Males who are very attractive experience the halo effect when growing up and all throughout adulthood. Girls are naturally attracted to them from a young age, and they will usually have their first sexual experiences much earlier than their less attractive peers. Women are drawn to them and are willing to sleep with them and be with them regardless of their personal flaws. A woman will forgive an attractive man for mistakes that average man would be shunned for. This is all part of the halo effect, which is a very real and highly studied phenomenon. For examples, go look at tinder experiments where a tall, attractive, masculine male is able to get sex on tinder within seconds of messaging a girl. Meanwhile an average looking dude will only get a few matches with ugly women and maybe never get laid for months. Chad is banging hundreds of girls off tinder in a year while Eugene cries and rubs one out while holding an anime body pillow.
Fact of the matter is, genetically attractive and masculine men just do much better among women, and average men can't compete. Think of the real world economy: Bill Gates (Chad) has tens of billions of dollars while the great mass of people barely have enough to get by. If anything, the sexual market is even less well regulated and has more inequality.

Fucking Kek

>genetics

There is something inherently feminine in this level of determinism

>Women today can browse tinder and pick up a 6'4 handsome, masculine man with the swipe of a finger. Average looking men are simply out of luck,
By this logic, wouldn't unattractive women have a harder time getting even average men?

Nice spook

What? No. Unattractive women are also fucking chad. Or they are fucking the scores of average or above average men that will worship the ground they walk on. Pussy is a treasure these days, and even unattractive women are extremely valuable in the sexual market.

>Nice spook
>using genetic determinism
Whoa.

>Unattractive women are also fucking chad
Why? Chad can also sort through the most attractive women. It would be physically impossible to fuck through the entire population of hot women and still, have the energy left over to fuck the unattractive ones. Why would they bother?

Think of it as a tiered system.
The very most attractive men (6'4 athletic handsome men with physical features indicative of high prenatal testosterone levels) can pick and choose between a very wide array of attractive women.
By the time you get to "average" Chad, he is already below the most attractive Chad. He can fuck attractive women, but to sate his desires he also fucks average women.
Then you get to the lower tier Chads and Brads. Their bread and butter is slightly below average women, and they will fuck unattractive women if that's all that's available. Even unattractive women can get Chad or Brad cock.
Sign up to tinder with an unattractive woman as your profile pic and see how many matches you get. It's insane.

So why is there a a four tier system for attractive men but only two (attractive, not attractive) for women?

>and they will fuck unattractive women if that's all that's available

Why? Not all pussy is created equally (pic related) and if it was why is this unique to women? By your logic the lower tier unattractive women would fuck unattractive and average guys while waiting for chads to be made available.

>get match
>get cock

It doesn't work like that.

I'm just telling you what happens in real life. 'tiers' don't actually exist, neither does Chad: he's just an archetype of the kind of male that females find attractive.

Women feel like they are entitled to Chad, and if they can't get Brad or Chad they will pass up on ugly or average looking men. Your pic isn't really relevant because that is probably like the bottom 0.01% of people in terms of looks. The vast majority (something like 80%) of women are considered attractive or fuckable by the vast majority of men, and the bottom 20% can still get an average bf who is willing to put up with them.
Yeah it does lol. If a guy matches a woman, he wants to fuck. I don't know where you are coming from that you think that's not how it works.

>'tiers' don't actually exist, neither does Chad
Then why are you talking about them as if they are real? If this is some kind of thought experiment why not accept my cirtcism?

>Women feel like they are entitled to Chad
If they don't actually exist in real life then why would you assume they think this? But more importantly why is it bad women think they are entitled to Chads but you won't fuck the women in the image?

>Your pic isn't really relevant because that is probably like the bottom 0.01% of people in terms of looks
How very convenient. In fact your whole delusional rant is very convenient.

Granted I shouldn't expect consistently from someone who says that
>Chad's are genetic super humans
but
>Bill Gates is a chad
and
>I'm fine because I have an attractive face

Its pure delusion.

>If a guy matches a woman, he wants to fuck
user's point is that you can get matched but it won't result in a date/fuck so your use of tinder statistics is skewed.

reminder that your mom is a slut too

Hmm I can't really respond to much of this unless I know where you are coming from as a person. Most of our views about sexuality are heavily distorted by our own personal lens.
I am just trying to explain how things work, I think it's a lot more helpful than useless platitudes.
Women are the ones who decide which men get to fuck. If a tinder date results in a match, but doesn't result in a date or sex, it's because the woman didn't want it. 99% of the time a man matches a woman, he is willing to date or fuck. If a woman gets 100 matches, that's 100 men she could get in her bed at a moment's notice. That's just the way things are.
The bill Gates thing was a metaphor comparing the monetary economy with the sexual economy.
Also, I don't blame women for feeling entitled to Chad, that's just there prerogative, but I do blame society for letting the sexual market degrade to this point.
I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions, new viewpoints are always appreciated

Maybe sharia law wouldn't be so bad after all.

what is ti like to be a full grown man choosing to serve as a dildo for women?

and be a

Gotta love the four white blonde women wearing expensive clothes and then the Asian underclass servant trailing meekly behind wearing a white frock.

>our views about sexuality are heavily distorted by our own personal lens
>I am just trying to explain how things work
Lmao, how convenient.

>that's 100 men she could get in her bed at a moment's notice
Do you not use tinder or something? Only around 20% of my matches result in dates and I only respond to maybe 70% of my matches. People change their minds the next day, flick too fast, reread their profile or just are unable to find the time to hang out. "Chads" probably have a lower response rate especially if what you say is true and they should basically be able to match with every single woman they swipe.

It would be moronic to try and use tinder statistics.

>The bill Gates thing was a metaphor
No it wasn't. You said "Bill Gates (Chad)".

>I do blame society for letting the sexual market degrade to this point
If its a free market then what's the problem? if someone doesn't want to fuck someone else then I don't see how that is societies fault. I don't see how you Keynesian reform genitals.

And really this whole thing sounds so convenient that pussy "is a valuable treasure" but so are the upper 30% of men, and this somehow equals that although 100% of women are getting sex while 70% of men are missing out.

I have 'won' a gorgeous girl when 'competing' with other guys much more attractive than I am because of 'chemistry'. You don't have to be handsome at all to land a long-term QT. Then you'll attract other women when they see you with her. Just keep it down on the low-key, cause you know how it is.

Looking for Mr. Goodbar

I really, really, don't know how to stop being socially awkward.the other things are easily changed but I don't even see what to do about that one

At least she knows you got problems beforehand so no surprises...and well, you would know she has problems either way, no woman past 15 is without problems according to all the books I read!

in search of lost time

You have to do (1) more. Socializing is a skill and awkwardness (or being an asshole) is what it looks like undeveloped.

Unless you have a true brain problem, you probably don't do (1) because of (3) and are (3) because you don't do (1).

>you probably don't do (1) because of (3) and are (3) because you don't do (1).

so what you're saying is, it's hopeless

No, but that you have only two options: embarrass yourself or kill yourself

This

Looks, status and money are the only things that matter

so what you're saying is, it's hopeless

1) she probably isn't that gorgeous (men tend to overrate female attractiveness)
2) you probably aren't that ugly compared to your peers

the vast majority of couples are looksmatched

There is something inherently feminine about determinism

>she probably isn't that gorgeous
How convenient

>hurr how convenient
post a pic of this gorgeous girl then
why should I trust you or your judgement?

Not even that user fag, but it seems like everything has to change so your world-view makes sense. Just stop.

>why should I trust you or your judgement
That ugly girl I posted wasn't all that unique but just so it fits your argument she represents less than 1%.

You didn't answer my earlier comments you slimy faggot.

Are you a female? I am trying to understand where you are coming from

How convient if I was.

Are there any girls on this board?

I'm not changing anything. that user alluded to anedoctal evidence and I pointed out facts: men rate women's attractiveness way higher than women hate male's attractiveness (women are more picky) and most couples have similar attractiveness
>That ugly girl I posted wasn't all that unique
hahaha she's solid genetic trash, my friend
just go through random facebook profiles and see for yourself. it will take a long time to find someone that ugly

>You didn't answer my earlier comments you slimy faggot.
this is my second post itt

>that user alluded to anedoctal evidence and I pointed out facts
>facts derived from "random facebook profiles" and based entirely on a person's taste

Just stop.

>facts derived from "random facebook profiles" and based entirely on a person's taste
wrong. see Walster "Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior"
your assumption that that "girl" isn't that ugly is grounded on solid research, I assume :^)

Fair enough. I guess my point is that I have a satisfying sex life and I'm not Chad Testosterone von McFatdick

>That ugly girl I posted wasn't all that unique but just so it fits your argument she represents less than 1%.
Come on, dude. She's literally deformed

sleeping beauty pg 1

Any of their baby carriages costs more than her yearly wage i bet

because you a leftist cuck who has brainwashed to hate his race. Women can sense your weakness from miles away. Get on /pol/ and Veeky Forums and sort yourself out. Learn about who you are and become the best you can be.

>Mme
kys

In one of the ASOIAF books a slut from Harrenhal gets her beautiful face punched in and teeth knocked out.
Jaime later takes pity on her and keeps her as a maid.

The Asian woman is more attractive than any of the blondes.

They're actresses.

who is this mickey mouse looking slut?

I read Houllebecq's elementary particles and the protagonists remarks how he doesn't want to fuck intellectual even slightly older women(who'd know him from his articles), only young, "physical", popular women.

HNNNNNNNG

youtube.com/watch?v=h1hSuLVLf2Q

Why link this shit?

Reymont: Peasants
Steinbeck: East of Eden

sluts and shit women get what they deserve for the late third for their lives, usually abandoned by their family (if they get any)

although they usually manage to ruin a few ppls life in the process

i just read How to Murder Your Life yesterday and would say it qualifies [not like madam bovary but you're setting the bar too damn high if you only want stuff that equals Flaubert]

the tone is amphetamine-fueled chicklit uptalk but its readable and educational. my jaw was hanging open at how badly a couple of the guys she was fucking treated her - all of them rappers and DJs and druggies. cat marnell is an archetype of the ruined millennial woman. its also instructive for you hard-line reactionaries out-there: if you go full fascist on your daughter, there's like a coin flip chance that she'll grow up to become a nightmarishly dysfunctional slag to spite you (cat's dad was a uptight and authoritarian conservative type)

we are all punished with whatever we deserve

Hamlet (Gertrude and Ophelia)

>there's like a coin flip chance that she'll grow up to become a nightmarishly dysfunctional slag to spite you
yeah girls love to upset their parents, which as usual with women, is done sooner or later through sex.

On being single in her 60s:

>"Sometimes I lie awake in bed and fantasize about much younger men, taking them inside me and having them surround me, excited, touching me, rubbing up against my body. But mostly I just paint or masturbate, haha!"

...

women deserve men who provide orgasms reliably. Men are meant to be disposable.

You misspelt semen.

>anorexic white women
Only a retard would attempt coitus with the average white woman.
They're vain, disloyal and stupid, to name but a few of their flaws.
To find a good white lass is like finding a red diamond.

>To find a good white lass is like finding a red diamond.
Truly, wise words to live by. Been in the supermarket the other day and saw some women looking slutty as fuck, wearing the shortest shorts and short t-shirts where you can see their abdomen and lower back; they checked occasionally if I was looking to them but I couldn't give less of a shit. I mean, I have porn for that, you whores with self-esteem issues.

Modern women have been tricked into thinking that men want relationships with whores when in reality most white men are quite conservative when it comes to choosing wife material.

men and women are both schizophrenic in sexual preferences

women want stable providers and wild bad boys

men want chaste respectable women and sex upfront right now (and what chaste women will give you that?)

attending to conflicting preferences in yourself and others is a perennial source of confusion and suffering. hence, people should stop blaming each other so much and being so damned vicious about each others dysfunction. life is hard

>>women want stable providers and wild bad boys
>
>men want chaste respectable women and sex upfront right now (and what chaste women will give you that?)
yeah and the solution to this is cheating, or for the smartasses ''open relationship'' and it turns out women have more opportunities without much work on their side