>less cold related diseases
Pathogens tend to do better in warmer conditions. Thawing permafrost can release ancient viral strains. Changes in seabird migratory patterns leads to new pathways and mutations for Bird Flu strains. Sea Level Rise creates more brackish water for diseases to thrive in. Mixing of fresh and saltwater from melting icecaps means that more freshwater viruses meet saltwater viruses and more diseases are created. Disease vectors expand range
>shorter, milder winter
Longer, harsher summer
>easier transport without snow and ice blocking highways, railways and sea routes, which helps lower the cost of supply and logistics
Sea level rise and storm surges damage coastal transportation infrastructure. More strong storms knock areas out of commission for months (see Puerto Rico and the IV bag shortage Irma caused in the USA). Poorly build highways and roads are destroyed in extreme heatwaves.
>longer harvest season and increased agricultural production for several countries
Wavier jet stream due to changes in Polar air mass temperature cause more unpredictable weather at strange times of year. More pests able to expand range and damage crops. Crops struggle in extreme heatwaves. Most of the world lives in tropical and subtropical regions where no benefit is felt anyway
>less energy needed to heat homes, reducing smog and pollution
Reduces the albedo of the earth by removing global dimming, which further speeds up the warming
>more cattle as more grazing areas are uncovered
More methane to make the issue worse
>longer building period which is usually slowing down or haltng alltogether in autum/winter
More time wasted repairing buildings damaged in extreme weather.
>opportunity to rebuild cities from the coastal areas into new and modern high tech developments using modern techniques, materials and planning
This is a fantasy. We aren't going to rebuild thousands of huge cities overnight. More like tent cities everywhere, and overpopulation inland.
What are the benefits of global warming?
nothing worth bombing there, they were after the rich countries
>Sea level rise and storm surges damage coastal transportation infrastructure.
Not all countries have extensive coast, not all depend on sea trade and these kind of damages aren't extensive.
>Poorly build highways and roads are destroyed in extreme heatwaves.
So they will be made well. Plenty of highways working well in places like Thailand or Saudi Arabia.
> Most of the world lives in tropical and subtropical regions where no benefit is felt anyway
Third world is not important for human civilization. As you yourself observe the benefit of global warming on agriculture can't be denied.
>More methane to make the issue worse
Kek, even better. Also cattle has no significant impact of methane in the atmosphere.
>More time wasted repairing buildings damaged in extreme weather.
Weather changing by +2/3 degrees won't make it extreme in Central Europe
>More time wasted repairing buildings damaged in extreme weather.
Yeah, we can see how whole cities are being constantly rebuilt in places like Singapore or Abu Dhabi right ?
>This is a fantasy. We aren't going to rebuild thousands of huge cities overnight.
>weather is going to change overnight
t.brainlet
> More like tent cities everywhere, and overpopulation inland.
Those who lack vision lack success.We will have whole arcologies and new modern cities not the crap we have now.
that's because European leadership wanted lawless open border policy
yeah if your entire power structure in governance wants a mass of chaotic immigration it will happen.
Meanwhile you don't see the same thing in Korea/Japan because they don't want it. Same thing with Australia and detaining boats.
The mess of immigrants in Europe wasn't some inevitable force of nature. It was asked for and planned for by the people in charge.
wtf are you rambling about?
those were just piss poor refugees.
We're talking about what happens when whole countries like India and Pakistan pull up the anchor and start moving north. That's at least 2 billion people, and now it's armies with their training and weapons.
They won't attack like an army, it will be unsymmetrical warfare.
>those were just piss poor refugees.
No they weren't, they were just men sent to colonize Europe.
>We're talking about what happens when whole countries like India and Pakistan pull up the anchor and start moving north. That's at least 2 billion people, and now it's armies with their training and weapons.
They won't attack like an army, it will be unsymmetrical warfare.
Most of them would die on way to Europe, and they could only bring small firearms with them. Bring it on.
The drone swarms will have a feast on those attempting to cross the border.
>its armies
>they wont' attack like an army
You are delusional about global warming and the military strength of poor refugees
>Global warming just means the temperature will go up slightly
>We're talking about what happens when whole countries like India and Pakistan pull up the anchor and start moving north. That's at least 2 billion people, and now it's armies with their training and weapons.
>2030
>sitting comfy in your chair shitposting on 999chan and drinking chocolate AI Mummy made you as you earn your Bitcoins by operating drone swarms against endless hordes of refugees with AK-47's storming borders