Are you ready for fusion power?

> Fusion

El Oh El

But No cold fusion? Haha what a joke

How are you measuring the speed of light from the source at the site of each observer?

>he believes in fusion energy.

Sounds to me like collapsing magnetic fields.
As the ions blew off into the chamber the magnetic fields they were sustaining collapsed generating an electric current.

That's nice and all, but we know about this and it isn't free/cheap energy. Look up Joule Thief.

dubz confirmz.

I'm about 21 minutes in, so far I have to commend the team for the overall quality of the presentation and for presenting plenty of video footage of their experiments, but I'm not sure of how significant any of this is given how widely discredited the EU theory is. Nevertheless, they are doing what looks like standard,reproducible experiments with plentiful data collection, so if they're wrong it should be possible to show how and why. I sense no fraud here, just possibly experimenters over their heads in a very advanced field of study.

Considering just how ridiculous their ideas are, there must be fraud, or they're so grossly incompetent in science and math that any so-called "data" that they have is so suspect as to be worthless by any real scientist.

That's a very rhetorically aggressive response, but it's light on substance-what specific aspects of this experiment could be wrong? Are their heating estimates potentially off base and not accounting for the effects of collapsing magnetic fields? Are they essentially playing with a basic plasma production machine and doing nothing new at all? What specifically is wrong with the EU theory?

>what specific aspects of this experiment could be wrong?
Considering that they don't even have a high school level of knowledge and physics, I don't expect that they could pass a high school lab course either. The amount and variety of errors that they make which could which could affect data that they write down are plethora.