Look what I have :)

Introduction was good

Were you at the Dublin launch op? I listened to Nagle last night on rte radio 1, I'm honestly tired of the navel gazing now, she knows less of the community than she lets on

Can you imagine an entire book about us anyway? "then they posted another stirner meme". "Then they posted another peterson thread that devolved into stupid arguments"

Whatever grand sociological conclusions one might (rightly or wrongly) arrive at because of witnessing Veeky Forums, is still contrasted by the incredibly banal, useless, repetitive nature of this site.

My neck hurts, i hope i never see this book in the local store

It's not simply about "us", as is obvious from the subheading.

>woman hands
>:)
Really makes me think

keep going. so far so shit

Stop flattering yourselves lads. The book isn't about Veeky Forums. Sure, it's in there, but only as a part.

I thought she was great on the Dead Pundit Society podcast and the Katie Halper show, when she criticises liberals.

I'm a lad, just with girly hands

Take a picture of the book with your dick in it

>The mythologies of our age in the West are not enforced by repressive theocratic regimes, but by the market command to be free, to be creative, to be flexible, to love what you do for even the most uninspiring of jobs. Work flexibility and freedom from ties to family duty and hierarchical institutions promised by the corporate-counterculture that reached its zenith in the 1990s has turned out to mean increased precarity and a race to the bottom in living standards. The promise of this vision has become, for those who can’t enter adulthood but are edging closer to natural infertility, a permanent CV-building career ladder leading to nowhere.

>Trump’s courting of anti-abortion conservatives and the fervent anti-feminism of his online traditional wife-seeking male fans certainly suggest a worrying turn but we are still far from Gilead. The real material unfreedom women experience today is a product of the subordination of everything to the market, not to traditionalism. Indeed, the rightward turn represented by the emergence of the youthful Trumpian right may be in part a product of the failure of progressive movements to diagnose our new problems of loneliness and atomization with calls for more of the sixties — individual freedoms, self-expression, and non-conformism. Today, women having children are treated as an expense and a nuisance. Traditionalists long for a past to which they can never return. But in an age of automation we should all be working less and having more time for the things that give life meaning yet somehow the reverse has happened.

the dead pundits interview was really great, i think she was on zero squared a few months ago too

Oh shit

(Hope this one isn't sideways btw)

that's a good essay

Corporate friendly identity politics killed the left and it's never coming back.

>acronym (acronym explained)

Are you retarded?

>or your mother will sleep peacefully tonight and wake up refreshed
Well fucked yourself over there buddy.

Idk how much you have read obviously but
would you care to maybe pick out an interesting page and not the fucking introduction to a shit book like this seems to be???

What nasty women's hands have you been looking at

>Barak
You can't even spell your former master's name right. How many copies are being printed again?

They eat their own kind.

>those who can’t enter adulthood but are edging closer to natural infertility
Nope, menopause comes much later

>The real material unfreedom women experience today is a product of the subordination of everything to the market, not to traditionalism
What good is your sexual "freedom" when everybody on paper can, yet nobody in practice wants, to have sex with you? Try as you might, you will grow old, impotent or in menopause too.

Women live longer than men, and yet their "value" becomes next to zero in their 50s, for crying out loud, and you wonder how could it possibly be that a woman would support "obsolete" ideas over marriage and sexual mores?

Do you want to lower the age of consent as to make yourself be worth even less in the marketplace? Do you want illiterate 16 year old kids or younger to steal what little romantic opportunities you were given so bad?

When there are no social, let alone legal, boundaries left, men and women scorned and betrayed will still seek a form of compensation, but the hard way. Barbarism on top of barbarism. Do you not see enough crimes of passion, vengeance, uxoricides in the news? These murders happen not because of a conspiracy of the powerful Big Other. Or a certain imageboard. Being abandoned hurts. It's a particular kind of pain, that is not going to be expressed always in the form of poetry, and that is contagious, which reminds me of STDs.

Sexual preference is exclusionary, anti-democratic - "barbaric" if there ever was such a thing worth calling that - the clearest sign we're animals pretending to be domesticated.

Yes, there's a social construct going on, perhaps it's time to entertain the notion that maybe, just maybe, the social construct was constructed for a reason.

>the failure of progressive movements to diagnose our new problems of loneliness and atomization with calls for more of the sixties — individual freedoms, self-expression, and non-conformism
The 60s were a campaign to create a free market of the sexes which is about as "free" as the one for commodities and non-sexual services.

Go sell your reified revolution some other place.

>But in an age of automation we should all be working less and having more time for the things that give life meaning yet somehow the reverse has happened.
One day you will know Porky is not interested in giving you shit for free if you ask nicely, maybe even that Porky and his machines do not require your existence, for that matter, but this is not that day. RIP Hegel's Lord and Bondsman dialectic as we once understood it.

not with that attitude

have you heard of this exciting new feature called "rotate image"

Dublinfag I presume. Do you know if I can buy the book in town? I pick up that you're not into it, but it sounds like you might have gone to the launch?

It's funny how so many /pol/ posters don't seem to understand the fundamental aspects of imageboards or their browsers.

you're replying to a /pol/ poster, friendo

PDF or GTFO

>One day you will know Porky is not interested in giving you shit for free if you ask nicely, maybe even that Porky and his machines do not require your existence, for that matter, but this is not that day. RIP Hegel's Lord and Bondsman dialectic as we once understood it.
Japan's economy has gone to shit but they don't seem to be doing too badly. Maybe there's still something of the Lord-Bondsman relationship in their industries? Would explain why they don't like anything that disrupts their society too much.

pretty please?

The women aren't happy, they work all day and can't raise kids, assuming they even procreate in the first place.

I mean, academic SOP is the reverse, as in
>full name (acronym)
but who cares