Two theories both explain data

"God did it" is always the simplest explanation.

Taking the bait...

To use God as an explanation requires that you first explain God.

Without Occam's razor there are innumerable explainations for any set of data/observations.

The OP just doesn't like losing arguments, but this is correct. If you didn't narrow down theories to those with the least amount of assumptions you invite relativism. Sure, your theory might be correct instead, but by entertaining your theory you have to look at 1000 others. Limiting your assumptions makes science works. You add assumptions as they are needed.

>you would need a good definition of 'simpler' that makes your prediction accurate.
Here,
>makes fewer assumptions

well, pic semi related...

Attached: 1505710121507.jpg (720x663, 101K)

well, pic semi related..

Attached: 1516606202807.jpg (720x405, 98K)

That is simply the statement that measure is monotonic wrt inclusion, not Ockham's razor. Also your example is essentially trolling.

if your theory is right then the other one should be falsifiable

>Integrate all theories over the likelihood that they are true
>This is literally how you do quantum field theory