I'm just interested to see if anyone catches the trick

# Solve

1

t. einstein

equals 1 for any value besides x=1

0, the numerator and denominator "cancel out"

it's not an equation

also you probably hid something underneath the selected area

this

wrong

It's amazing how obvious bait can get this many replies

The absolute state of Veeky Forums

>studies have shown people who save brainlet wojak images are more likely to be dumb enough to fall for shitty bait

Pretend there's an equal sign my fault sorry

What if x=1?

A line at y = 1 with a hole in the graph at x = 1. What do I win

I knew it was bait but I just like posting the retarded wojak pics because they make me laugh.

>my fault

No, it's your mother's fault for not aborting you when she had the chance.

You cannot solve....It's simply a statement

This

ax+by=c

x+(b/a)y=c/a

why is this allowed, shouldn't it be

x+(by)/a=c/a

pic related, me

What does this have to do with the question?

they both mean the same thing

it equals 1 for all x not equal to 1

made me laugh as well, tee hee

>t. skipped the limits section of first year calc

Are you all seriously this retarded? The limit exists for all x and that limit is 1, there are no asymptotes. Fucking brainlets think they're clever

>there are no asymptotes

There aren't

This is correct. The top and bottom disappear leaving nothing (zero)

chu mean solve?

i can simplify it to 1 if x =\= 0

You multiply by (x+1)/(x+1)

(x^2 + 2x +1 ) / (x^2 + 1)

if x=0 then expression = 1

if x=1 then expression = 2

I really appreciate this reaction.

[math]

1 ~ \forall ~ x ~ \epsilon ~ \mathbb{R} \backslash \{ 1 \}

[/math]

My actual father genuinely believes that "it's not possible to divide by zero" is a myth, and possibly even a corporate conspiracy, as being able to divide by zero would allow us to get infinite energy.

He also thinks he can build a perpetual motion machine with magnets at home.

dont reply, someone who cant use l'hopital is obv baiting

its actually 1 for every x

communicative property of multiplication

it's (x^2 + 2x +1 ) / (x^2 - 1), by difference of two squares. this is algebra

(x-1)/(x-1)=0

=(x-1)*(x-1)

=x^2-x+1

Where did I go wrong

not even l'hopital fuckstain

y=1

I know this is bait but you'd be surprised how many people do this even up to Calc III.

y=1

x=/=1

Since when does multiplication communicate?

/thread

>studies show/suggest...

>according to scientists...