Is the Simulation hypothesis plausible or brainlet Tier?

Is the Simulation hypothesis plausible or brainlet Tier?

Attached: simulation-862361.jpg (590x350, 143K)

Brainlet tier. On the same level as Many Worlds or any other no-evidence theories

Many worlds is not in the same shit basked, stop watching retarded youtube videos that have no clue what they're talking about

yes, simulation is brainlet tier

About the Same Level as the entire Universe being the dream of azathoth

Only one form of it is even remotely plausible and that's the "the entire universe and every single quantum field in every location of space and time is part of the simulation" form. And even then it's a metaphysical hypothesis rather than a physical one so it is completely untestable, unfalsifiable, and unscientific.

It's on the same level as believing in God: you are free to do so and aren't wrong for it, but if you start trying to use it to explain ANY part of the universe or its mechanics (or take any part of the universe or its mechanics as evidence for it) then you've entered the realm of pseudoscience and deserve only to be ignored and ridiculed by your peers.

Many worlds is worse than simulation

the universe is a type of computer

the data and the instructions with what to do with the data (you)

spooky shit


>asking a question here

Attached: 1518532791093.jpg (1200x900, 1003K)

you just have no clue what you're talking about, sorry

How? It's just what you get when you take Schrödinger equation at face value without making any assumptions about special rules regarding wavefunction collapse. It's literally just Occam's Razor applied to quantum mechanics.

There are retards who think that it's some kind of justification for their deja vu or parallel universes but they're just retards whose opinions do not have any reflection on the simple and purely mathematical many-worlds interpretation.

Many world's is not Occam's razor, it's forced determinism

no, hidden variables is forced determinism
Many worlds is still probabilistic

It's not. I'm glad you confirmed you don't know what you're talking about.

this, and simulation is really bad

>Many worlds is still probabilistic
No it isn't

>How?
>It's just what you get when you take Schrödinger equation at face value without making any assumptions about special rules regarding wavefunction collapse. It's literally just Occam's Razor applied to quantum mechanics.

You answered your own question, there.

there are people who believe simulation theory explains the mandela effect

And those people are stupid. Some people think quantum mechanics explains psychic powers and they're stupid too.

at least as plausible as a god or gods

i have a cat in a box i'd like you to take a look at

>schrodinger had a pet cat named milton
we will never understand the horrors this cat experienced

>there are people who believe retarded things can explain the other retarded things they believe

They are called mongoloids

Attached: 1520905954165.jpg (500x511, 237K)

>Many worlds is not in the same shit basked
It absolutely is.

Thanks for proving you know nothing about the many worlds meme.

you just watched some retarded youtube video about it and though "wow, that's stupid"
you got no clue what you're talking about