Alright lets see how good you are. Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers ?

# Alright lets see how good you are. Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers ?

Other urls found in this thread:

**wolframalpha.com**

**youtube.com**

**youtube.com**

**twitter.com**

No

more odds since all negative numbers are odd

define "more"

in the poset of subsets of the naturals ordered by subsets, the odd numbers are strictly below the naturals

but the odd numbers are also equicardinal with the naturals

Get outta here and go back to Hilbert's Hotel!

[math] \aleph_0 [/math]

depends on what set of numbers you're using

Hitler's Hotel never ran out of room either.

All odd numbers have a negative equivalent

Almost all even numbers have a negative equivalent

0 and -0 are the same thing

Because 0 has no proper negative equivalent, there is one fewer even number than odd

QED

>implying [math]\infty-1

not compatable with definition

**wolframalpha.com**

An unbounded quantity that is greater than every real number.

y=x and y=x-1

tell me where they intersect

theres the same amount of both, brainlets

There are infinitely many odd numbers and infinitely many even numbers. Infinity isn't a number you can graph.

>Infinity isn't a number you can graph

There are just as many even numbers as odd numbers.

>Even numbers = 2x

>Odd numbers = 2x+1

>implying it is

Show me a graph of the "number infinity" on a number line. I'll wait.

>what is a ray

That's nice. But what about OP's babby-tier brainlet question?

Odd and even is clearly a larger infinity that just odd.

Try something harder next time.

>brainlet

>all infinite series are the same size

rainlet

the ones discussed are

brainlet

this is going in my lecture notes about compactification

No, they're not.

OP specified a series of odd numbers and a series of odd and even numbers.

A grade school student could tell you the series of odd and even numbers would be the larger infinite series. At any odd number in the first series, the second series would have nearly twice as many numbers at the same odd number.

>lectures in subway stops intensifies

your rat friends will believe you as long as you have bread to offer

they both are aleph-0 you incontinent retard

For the set of all odd numbers to be aleph-0 it must be paired with the set of all even numbers.

They intersect at infinity dumb dumb.

or paired with all the natural numbers

or anything fucking else the size of aleph-0

There is a bijection between them, if that is what you are asking.

>odd and even numbers

>odd and even

trick question, no number is both odd and even

his question was :

let a represent odd numbers;

let b represent even numbers;

let c = a+b;

now his question was :

"Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers?"

is a>c

the awser is : yeah we have more odd and even numbers.

I see what you did there.

a, b, c are not real numbers so that doesn't work

Depends on what mathematics you’re analyzing. Nicomachus classified numbers into three categories ‘even and odd’ ‘odd and even’ and ‘even and even’. It’s just based on the factors of the numbers involved to create that number. In truth, specifically, number types really are more complicated than people give them credit for and the two types ‘even’ and ‘odd’ is far too simplistic.