Is this correct from a psychological point of view?
jordanbpeterson.com
On the so-called “Jewish Question”
Grayson Lee
Other urls found in this thread:
unz.com
twitter.com
Nicholas Miller
sage, reported
and please never comeback to Veeky Forums ever again
stay in rebbit or /pol/ with your e-celebs
Jose Russell
No, Jews are not that smart. American jews may have had a 112 group IQ average 50+ years ago, but Jews have highly dysgenic breeding patterns, and they are much more culturally the same as the American populace as a whole than they once were.
Here is some data from Harvard.
Nathaniel Perry
More data. You can follow the links to check the data yourself.
Christopher Ortiz
>psychological
Not science or math
Mason Brooks
Here is data you need to verify that Jews at Harvard are much dumber than they used to be.
Smart jews have few children and marry outside their ethnic group. Dumb jews have tons of kids. Over a few generations this has caused jews to lose most of the cognitive edge they once had.
Peterson is wrong.
Jonathan Bailey
The idea that Jews have a standard deviation advantage on the rest of the population comes from very, very old studies that had questionable sampling. There is no current evidence to say that jews are that smart. There is plenty of evidence to say that they are much dumber than they used to be and that they are disproportionately found in places like the Ivy League because of nepotism.
Ron Unz got a lot of attention for this work (not enough). The most important fact is that Harvard and other schools absolutely refuse to have transparent admissions data open to audit. If you believe Harvard (through the grape vine), the data is explained by Jews dominating legacy admissions which is possible. However, this is still nepotism.
Also, it is noteworthy to acknowledge that Jews were once discriminated against in Harvard admissions. The most telling part now is that asians are just as if not more discriminated against as Jews were, and, by this data, non-jewish whites are even more discriminated than asians!
Joseph Stewart
Don't you guys know that legacy admissions to Harvard and most top schools exist? They don't focus on just selecting the brightest kids or those with most potential and never have.
Owen Parker
Yes, I covered that in the post you responded to. Maybe you should have read it? Here:
>The most important fact is that Harvard and other schools absolutely refuse to have transparent admissions data open to audit. If you believe Harvard (through the grape vine), the data is explained by Jews dominating legacy admissions which is possible. However, this is still nepotism.
Kayden Hill
Also, Jews dominating legacy admissions confirms that they are dumber than they once were, so my main point, the point that contradicts Peterson's assertions, stands as well.
I don't believe in legacy admissions. Many jews don't either, to be fair. But you don't see the Harvard jewish clubs lobbying to end this nepotistic practice!