.
Untitled
I memorized this for Calc I final exam and forgot a couple of weeks later.
>[math] \log _{e} [/math]
REPORTED!
Remember when you posted this a few days ago and everyone called you retard for expecting anyone to actually make an attempt at solving it? I remember.
>[math]\log_e[/math]
>muh ln
this ways people would know that log is not only base 10
log is assumed to be in base e, not base 10
log is always base e
seriously though, how would you solve this? i dont think it has an answer
Holy shoot what's wrong with yous
>all these brainlets
did you even go to school
Signs of high school dropouts
>Uses "lg" for ld
Did you make that yourself?
I used to do this for A-Level Maths years ago. And I proved I could do it by getting my qualification.
Wait till you get a day job you won't remember how to do it either m8.
log is assumed base 10
ln is base e
how old are you?
engineer brainlet detected
Math freshmen barely discovering programming detected.
What do you have to memorize? Just draw a triangle and use the Pythagorean theorem and trig
Yup, except for that big symbol on the left
I dunno what that one stands for
It's an elongated "s" and it means sum the top with the bottom
You fucking nigger use integral calc instead of asking sci
Integral-calculator.com
>h-he's a brainlet!!! i know that ln is just a meem! log base e! it's different from ln!
I don't know what you think you graphed there friendo, but last time I checked:
"log" refers to logarithm base 10, SOMETIMES base e but typically, base 10.
"ln" refers to the natural logarithm, i.e log base e.
In either case, log base is is either redundant or more clearly stated as ln.