From an evolutionary standpoint, are women superior to men?

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

smaller, more efficient body
less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
more attractive than male counterparts
in control of 98% of reproduction, and can control the other 2% with a snap of the fingers
the "worst" thing that can happen to their genetic line is getting raped, in which case they still reproduce
Why aren't there like 3 women to every 1 man instead of it being half-and-half? Statistically speaking half of men are trash and won't ever reproduce anyways.

Attached: 1521054801684.jpg (104 KB, 800x533)

All urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher's_principle

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

more attractive than male counterparts
that's subjective
smaller, more efficient body
efficient in what nigga? Growing a baby?
in control of 98% of reproduction, and can control other 2% with a snap of fingers
lol

eGremlin
eGremlin

less muscle density, meaning when it comes to fighting off animals and other people they get fucked
extremely vulnerable during pregnancy as they can't move fast or do much physical exercise
can die giving birth
Yeah, maybe socially you have an advantage but If were talking survival skills, guys everytime.

CodeBuns
CodeBuns

from an evolutionary standpoint
men and women are the same species so comparing men to women doesn't make sense from an evolutionary standpoint

BunnyJinx
BunnyJinx

Smaller body isn't an advantage. They're also significanlty weaker, slower, less intelligent, and less successful, not to mention placed out of commission for 3/4 of a year each time they're impregnated.
Statistically speaking half of men are trash and won't ever reproduce anyways.
The fact men are constantly being weeded out in selection means men are always improving. You see this with IQ tests for example where men are pushed to both the lowest and highest extremes through the incentive to experiment and take risks that aggressive selection creates.

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

Don't forget less prone to genetic defects

Attached: 1478818129146.jpg (122 KB, 768x1024)

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

Why aren't there like 3 women to every 1 man instead of it being half-and-half? Statistically speaking half of men are trash and won't ever reproduce anyways.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher's_principle

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

Bring born female is a genetic defect.

Illusionz
Illusionz

less prone
more like more prone amirite?

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

/r9k/

Supergrass
Supergrass

pregnancy is a huge drain on a woman's resources. it's the reason that women are oppressed in many countries.
more attractive
lol another man who has no idea how to tell if a woman is wearing makeup
less prone to violence
actually women have less strength than men of equal height/weight. any given man could probably destroy the average woman if he really wanted to.
getting raped leads to reproduction
this implies that women only give birth to women. are you retarded

Dreamworx
Dreamworx

They are, but not for the reason's you're stating.
smaller, more efficient body
being smaller is a secondary sex characteristic, it's not a female specific train so you can't give that to females.
less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
This doesn't make sense
more attractive than male counterparts
LMAO no, men are more aesthetic, even though I am sexually attracted to women males are a more aesthetic form.
in control of 98% of reproduction, and can control the other 2% with a snap of the fingers
THIS is why they are superior, Briffault's law.
the "worst" thing that can happen to their genetic line is getting raped, in which case they still reproduce
This doesn't make sense.

In reality, this is the right answer.

viagrandad
viagrandad

If they were superior from an evolutionary standpoint there would be more of them: selection pressures would have ensured that populations that produced 9 women to every 1 man would be more successful than the 1:1 we see in humans.

Clearly there is something men contribute that is just as important to the survival of the species as the ability to birth children. My guess is that even though it only takes one man to impregnate several women, you still need several men to protect and hunt for those women while they are crippled by pregnancy and caring for their offspring. The fact that we're roughly equal in population is all the evidence you need that it's the optimal balance of these roles.

FastChef
FastChef

Low effort bait

Crazy_Nice
Crazy_Nice

are women superior to men?
idk, but I do know something; the average woman is immensely more valuable than the average man, especially when women can entirely depend on the state to live comfortably, and if not comfortably they can gain employment to achieve their consumerist dreams, effectively removing their need for men. This inequality between the equity of genders is increasing exponentially due to the degradation of manual labour through automation in which lower IQ men are no longer required by society(women). The only remedy in this would be sexbots and artifical wombs.

Harmless_Venom
Harmless_Venom

Stfu Schlomo
>>>/tumblr/

Attached: 1478463660697.jpg (380 KB, 1333x1000)

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
You don't get to choose when a dangerous animal/other human attacks you.

King_Martha
King_Martha

in which lower IQ men are no longer required by society(women).
There isn´t a smart engineer or businessman for every woman, user.

cum2soon
cum2soon

can control 2%
lmfao no. women can only control numale pussies that think giving women the control = sex.

the day i give my wife the control over our relationship is the day she loses interest in me and leaves.

Techpill
Techpill

citation needed

Supergrass
Supergrass

smaller more efficient body
Lower required input of energy, yes. More efficient at doing what?
less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
Also less able to hunt big game
More attractive
Subjective? Also, girls are in their prime in their teens, while men are good pickings for most of their adult lives. The whole "men age better than women" thing.
In control of 98% of reproduction
How whipped are you?
worst thing is getting raped
true, although this counters the last point doesn't it?

Men are sexually reproductive for as long as they can get an erection. Females get barren halfway through their lifespan.
The older women get, the likelier they are of sustaining damage from procreating

Are women superior to men? Considering we both need each other to reproduce I would say no.We're just specialized in different ways

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

Personally I think the biggest flaw with female physiology is menopause.
Decreased estrogen significantly reduces bone mineral density in women leading to osteoporosis. Which can lead to broken bones from your average fall.

Raving_Cute
Raving_Cute

feminist baiting
Why aren't there like 3 women to every 1 man
the absolute state of sci

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

Attached: 1521532625105.png (759 KB, 1064x1920)

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

If you think parasitism is superior to actual work then yes

Raving_Cute
Raving_Cute

superior
their entire lives involves in bargaining their vagina
lmao

likme
likme

Men brought women a thousand domestic conveniences so they could cook us more varied and delicious food in less time. What do we get in return? Endless roast beef.

Snarelure
Snarelure

more attractive than male counterparts

This is objectively wrong. The greatest aesthetes in history have all remarked on how the male form is more beautiful than the female.

Emberfire
Emberfire

they are stupid and week and emotional and have a nice filthy period

StonedTime
StonedTime

My grandmother spent all day cooking and cleaning.
My mother spent half the day cooking and cleaning.
My wife is a parasite who orders takeout.
My daughter will be a parasite who orders takeout.
My granddaughter will spend all day cooking and cleaning.

Weak men make hard times, but add on the burden of useless women and whooowheee.

CodeBuns
CodeBuns

We are better in every aspect. But by law of nature the women have control over the gene pool. So everything that happens happens because women reproduce with retards. If you don't believe me then if a retarded man doesn't have children the next generation will not be retarded unless women allow it.

Big guy, acts gangsta, dropped highschool
Women likey. ( But will eventually end up in a abusive relationship and will blame men for what she got herself stuck into )

Ace grades, Timid and shy, Has a bright future
Outcasted by society

Think about it, no one cares if you are smart until you start doing something but no one cares if you are dumb just as long as you're doing something.

A scientist will never end up in history if he doesn't invent something revolutionary eventhough he is smarter than most of the human population and is outcasted and never have kids

But a dumb person can still act like a retard and females being females will mate with them

StrangeWizard
StrangeWizard

le redpilled 15 year old

VisualMaster
VisualMaster

if you define superiority as the ability to tyrannically influence others for your gains then no.

Men can easily overpower women. We can rape them to secure our existence, and kill them if they are disobedient.

I can't think of any instance where women come out on top.

Ignoramus
Ignoramus

i'm not 15
i'm 12

SomethingNew
SomethingNew

X-linked recessive disorders. Women have two X chromosomes.

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

Nice argument, brainlet.

SniperGod
SniperGod

Yes. We could kill 99% of men and keep the rest in cages and milk them for their semen and the human race would be fine. You can't do that for women.
Women are the master race. Males should be smaller, docile and submissive to their female owners, like cute pets. Or would you rather be in the semen cages?

GoogleCat
GoogleCat

the future is female (if technology keeps progressing).

Supergrass
Supergrass

Shut up

kizzmybutt
kizzmybutt

Sure, I today’s and in most societies.

But it’s mainly because they are picky about who they mate with, and because laws (a social construct) protect this decision. I guarantee that if there were a non picky version of the human female most women would be useless.

I do not believe that all women are of little or of no use to men, there are many contributions made by women, the ratio of women’s contributions to men’s I don’t know nor care. But I feel they “hold power” or are better off due to society and social norms.

FastChef
FastChef

From an evolutionary standpoint, are women superior to men?
From an evolutionary standpoint, nothing is superior to anything. As long as you are alive, you are fit to exist.

Attached: 1521660098519.jpg (101 KB, 739x673)

Sir_Gallonhead
Sir_Gallonhead

smaller, more efficient body
More efficient in what sense? They are physically weaker, have fewer neurons and synapses, and produce a lot less wealth and innovation in general.
less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
Violence also increases the chance of having hundreds of descendants, if you are a Chad. Genghis Khan didn't spread his genes by being a pacifist.
more attractive than male counterparts
They have a heavily front loaded sexual market value, and their attractiveness quickly fades after their 20s.
in control of 98% of reproduction, and can control the other 2% with a snap of the fingers
Artificial wombs are not that far away.

happy_sad
happy_sad

Spoken like one who hasn't taken a genetics or evolution course, or really even basic bio. Evolutionary fitness is the ability to transmit information into future generations through heritable traits. A person is considered to be "Evolutionarily fit" when they have reproduced and their offspring has in turn reproduced. This can be modulated through complex interpersonal interactions such as when a single cell contributes to tissue. In other terms it means that you make sure people closely related to you, such as sisters or brothers, survive and produce grandkids. It makes you "evolutionarily fit".

In the strictest sense a mother passes on more information to the child as she gives a great majority mitochondria and cellular materials.

hairygrape
hairygrape

They also have better colour eyesight, with colour blindness being exceptionally rare and only women have been found to be tetrachromats meaning they can see another primary colour.
That's dumb as you would make retards real quick with that level of inbreeding.

good bait though

PackManBrainlure
PackManBrainlure

that's subjective
It really isn't.

Attached: 1513475156489.jpg (441 KB, 1080x1080)

Burnblaze
Burnblaze

being small and weak is "superior" because you can't hurt anything
an inability to fight is superior
I hope you are eaten by a bear you stupid roastie

RavySnake
RavySnake

That's dumb as you would make retards real quick with that level of inbreeding.
There is more than enough variation, and if not we keep 5% of m*les in the semen cages. Now be a good boy and get in your cage <3

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

Even 5% would be impractical. Plus then you would need to keep killing all male children or genetically select for females. At that point might as well genetically test then kill the lot of em and just build babies.

RumChicken
RumChicken

We could easily do almost the same with females. We couldn't kill 99% but we could kill say 90%, keep the rest in cages and just keep them pregnant from age 14-24.

TechHater
TechHater

also, good luck killing us males and putting us in cages you weak roastie. I'll just slap you and you'll start crying.

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

We need uterus farms.

Snarelure
Snarelure

Attempt to breed strong, physically superior males out of the breeding population
Weak, small, docile men suddenly everywhere in media, propaganda, news, etc
Two generations pass
Superior males not getting weeded out of the population
butwhy?.jpeg
Women divided on sexual mating preferences
Superior males mating regularly
Docile males reluctant to mate
wecanfixthat.png
Begin culling superior males
Pass laws to enact worldwide culling
Superior males slaughter viable docile male population after cull begins
Incensed, continue with slaughter of female population that attempted to destroy them
Remaining males and females are superior and viable, have less genetic defects, have been selected for perfect biological fitness
No roasties or soybois
shoggothorgytime.webm

Please do try. You win if you chip away at people's morals. You lose if you provoke us. Just throw us into the fire and temper us to be the stake aimed at your throat.

Stark_Naked
Stark_Naked

less violent
good

and that’s how you get killed by more violent tribes.

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

From an evolutionary standpoint, are women superior to men?
No, women are, as of yet, not a species, they can not reproduce by themselves.

smaller, more efficient body
This seems pretty bad for anything that requires a lot of strength.

less prone to violence that puts themselves in danger
Both flight or fight are valid responses, putting one above the other demonstrates that you are absolutely retarded.

in control of 98% of reproduction, and can control the other 2% with a snap of the fingers
But this is false. No women can reproduce without a man.

the "worst" thing that can happen to their genetic line is getting raped, in which case they still reproduce
?????????????????
You know that a women can die without having children?

Statistically speaking half of men are trash and won't ever reproduce anyways.
Statistically speaking that is false, I am not aware of any study that suggests that half of men don't reproduce but I am very much inclined to belief that this is false.

Why aren't there like 3 women to every 1 man
Because, women have a "smaller body", thus are worse at fighting and need men to ensure their survival.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit