What do you have to say about this, Veeky Forums?

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

What do you have to say about this, Veeky Forums?

Attached: sci-btfo.png (347 KB, 2366x612)

All urls found in this thread:

sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion146.html

Playboyize
Playboyize

Trivially true

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

wikipedia says so, therefore it must be true!

CouchChiller
CouchChiller

If that is true than an infinite universe means God exists

BinaryMan
BinaryMan

This is a boring thread. We have it daily and it always unequivocally devolves into wildburger posting. Stop it.

GoogleCat
GoogleCat

trivially false
sites.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion146.html

Spazyfool
Spazyfool

number theory is for fuckin nerds desu

likme
likme

wikipedia
Anyone can edit that.

Flameblow
Flameblow

Attached: 1519462627866.png (678 KB, 1200x758)

RavySnake
RavySnake

a convergent series equals it's limit

Attached: 1510327590987.png (83 KB, 645x614)

FastChef
FastChef

An engineer wrote that. 0.999999999999999999 meters = 1 meter in real life and anyone who says otherwise is just trying too hard to be correct and/or funny.

Pure math wise, this guy has the right idea.

Spamalot
Spamalot

0.999... = 0.999...
10(0.999...) = 10(0.999...)
10(0.999...) = 9.999...
10(0.999...) = 9 + 0.999...
9(0.999...) = 9
0.999... = 1

Soft_member
Soft_member

No one actually bothers to read the article which shows proofs

viagrandad
viagrandad

what are equivalence classes of cauchy sequences

Attached: 1503220800005.jpg (7 KB, 300x168)

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

What the fuck is this shit. Why would I want "cults", "infanticide", "preemptive penal organ harvesting", or "Sacred whores".

How is Matt. VII. xix "omnis arbor quae non facit fructum bonum exciditur et in ignem mittitur" relevant?

LuckyDusty
LuckyDusty

retards can't accept not all reals have unique decimal representation

Flameblow
Flameblow

Don't bother, people arguing about this topic don't even know what a real number is.

Techpill
Techpill

prove that 10(0.999....)=9.999...

Spamalot
Spamalot

It's it's true, then you should be able to prove 0.999 = 1 in base 2 or in base 6 number systems. I suspect any proof wouldn't work in any number system other than base10.

TalkBomber
TalkBomber

sure thing
[eqn]0.\overline{1}_2=\sum_{1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^N}=\frac{1}{2}*\sum_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^N}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-\frac{1}{2}}=1\\
0.\overline{5}_6=\sum_{1}^{\infty}\frac{5}{6^N}=\frac{5}{6}*\sum_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{6^N}=\frac{\frac{5}{6}}{1-\frac{1}{6}}=1[/eqn]

New_Cliche
New_Cliche

10(0.999...) = 10(9/10+9/100+9/1000+...) = 9+9/10+9/100... = 9.999...

Need_TLC
Need_TLC

and generally
[eqn]x\in\mathbb{N}\backslash\{0\}\\
0.\overline{(x-1)}_x
=\sum_{1}^{N}\frac{(x-1)}{x}
=\frac{(x-1)}{x}\sum_{0}^{N}\frac{1}{x}
=\frac{\frac{(x-1)}{x}}{1-\frac{1}{x}}
=\frac{\frac{(x-1)}{x}}{\frac{x}{x}-\frac{1}{x}}
=\frac{\frac{(x-1)}{x}}{\frac{x-1}{x}}
=1[/eqn]

viagrandad
viagrandad

it's always bugged the fuck out of me that the image isn't logarithmically scaled

askme
askme

it just goes to show that math can be a fraud, and we all know that
magical "logic tricks" that are not true, yet, "the proofs!" are "given"
close enough for government work

TreeEater
TreeEater

math can be a fraud
how is it fraudulent?

TechHater
TechHater

calculus is evidence of God

Attached: maximum-intelligence.gif (2.9 MB, 500x540)

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

whoops
that first line should be
[eqn]x\in\mathbb{N}\backslash\{0,1\}[/eqn]

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit