Why are conservatives better writers than liberals?

Reactionaries>Marxists>Fascists>Anarchists>Liberals>Conservatives.

what about Catholic Stalinism?

Why does OP feel the need to ask politically loaded questions on a literature board?

the world may never know the source of this faggotry

They don't bullshit when it really counts, they only push agendas.

Liberals push agendas too, but they exaggerate the living shit out of their cases, points, and make mountains out of prairiedog feces.

Yes, slavery was a conservative extreme, and now LGBTabcdefg is the liberal extreme... I'd rather deal with slavery and a "you're a slave or you're the owner" world than "you are not allowed to speak unless you account for the feelings and opinions of every single individual in attendance and if you say, think, feel, or do anything that isn't in accordance with the average of the majority or the movements of the publicly outspoken repressed, you will be harassed at any and every opportunity, and people will try to socially/professionally ruin your life."

I'm already shit enough at social skills and people skills, I don't need to deal with this politically correct faggotry, too.
>and no, I'm not a cisgender white 20-somethings male living in a "1st world" country in the occident

Should be together with Marxism.

WAYQ

>Hey, Veeky Forums, why is x true?

B-B-BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!! AND I CAN PROVE IT.

>Ok, prove it.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

just gay, nigga

>as if lit wasn't always politically fueled

stop idiot. /pol/ is that way. you don't impose your middling obsession with political labels onto a board about literature

WAYQ

>make an arbitrary, ridiculous, and entirely unsubstantiated claim
>bias confirm your way to '''''''victory'''''' through meme elf posting
>Expect anything other than ridicule and reactionary meme posting

get off of my board illiterate cretin

empiricist poetics. short paragraphs, punchy analogies, accumulation of impressive facts. very easy to read and very convincing—what you feel as learning something is just persuasion to the author's ideology, though. too bad.

who are you quoting?

Borges

>Borges
I said good.

Most writers of generations ago would be considered conservatives today :^)

the american right has become radically anti intellectual.

trump is either a cognitive retard or is dumbing down to appeal to the lowest common denominator

Eliot

exactly

>borges
>not good

user plz

Reactionaries>Fascists>Marxist=Anarchists>Liberals>Conservatives

Kurt Vonnegut and George Orwell were socialists.

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire."

-Robert A. Heinlein

So he's an anarchist then?

Why are you shitposting instead of discussing literature?

>Kurt Vonnegut
>George Orwell

>good writers

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein#Politics
>Heinlein considered himself a libertarian; in a letter to Judith Merril in 1967 (never sent) he said, "As for libertarian, I've been one all my life, a radical one. You might use the term "philosophical anarchist" or "autarchist" about me, but "libertarian" is easier to define and fits well enough."

So yes and no.

Stop responding to this shit people. It's the goddamn literature board.

Sage goes in every field