When writing
>i,ii,iii,iv
or
>i,ii,iii,iiii
which is more patrician?
When writing
>i,ii,iii,iv
or
>i,ii,iii,iiii
which is more patrician?
i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, ix, x
oder
i, ii, iii, iiii, iiiii, iiiiii, iiiiiii, iiiiiiii, iiiiiiiii, iiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Generally I stedet IV, but on watches IIII is superior.
I prefer *
vi vi vi
>the quick frozen fox
eni idi ici
>jumps ogre lazy joy
>not using Attic numerals
YEAH, YOU'RE SPECIAL. lET'S HOPE THAT YOUR CONTINUOUS NEED TO FIND YOURSELF AT THE OPPOSITE END OF ANY OTHER FORM OF SENTIENT LIFE WILL ULTIMATELY LAND YOU IN THE PIT YOU DESERVE.
...
>1727
What?
>i,ii,iii,iv
>not I, II, III, IV
fucking anglos
let me guess u did what i did
anyone else getting a cool optical rainbow effect from this?
looks like columns of purple-green-yellow-red-repeat
That's the most affected hand I ever saw.
iiii is older but iv is objectively superior. I'd say this is one of those cases where convenience trumps precedent.
Indeed
On the contrary, according the the Attic system IIII is correct notation, therefore I agree with OP's second statement.
It's correct in the Roman system too. You hardly ever see subtractive notation in medieval documents.
That handwriting, what the hell man. How much of a Lord of the Rings fanboy are you?
IIII is literally the patrician choice, as IV was used as a contraction of IVPITER.
Your writing doesn't make any sense, user
IIII either makes you look pretentious or uneducated depending on the context.
That's how you know you've reached the apex.
it's over not ogre
>eye quick 6rown fox jump` ogre tye layy doz
On a watch face, IIII, everywhere else IV
1,2,3,4
Do you really care about what is patrician? With that writing?
(answer is IIIJ with the hook of the J descending below the writing line)