Post your reading lists

Let's do a /pol/ simulator, in case going to the board is too difficult to you.

>Cernovich
Kike
>Orwell
Helicopter bait
>Roosh V
Shitskin
>Southern
Kike
>Rand
Lolbertarian (maybe most favored after Nietzsche)
>Nietzsche
based
>Dawkins
globalist
>Milo
degenerate kike faggot
>McInnes
degenerate
>Riley
nigger
>Sommers
literally who?

This is an alt-lite, the_donald tier booklist. It would get you laughed out of /pol/, just like if you started saying shit like "Israel is our greatest ally", "/pol/ is just satire", or "the Democrats are the real racists". Nigger, /pol/ is straight up racist, and they own up to it proudly.

well to be fair, the last time I was on pol was around election time when the leddit infestation was in full swing. Has it "recovered" to it's old state by now?

The more humorous pol nickname for milo is: "n*gger loving kike faggot"

Is /pol/ really that spectrum to hate Milo or McInnes? They're not Nazis but I don't see how their popularity doesn't shift the discourse towards /pol/. They remind me of the sectarian leftist groups that denounce anyone other than them as capitalists

>n*gger
>censoring yourself on an anonymous korean image board
How many layers of cuckoldry are you on?

You mean like what I consider my personal canon?

Because, they think he doesn't believe any of the shit he's preaching, and is just pandering to Republicans and the alt-right in order to raise his own popularity.

>D&C
I don't care about someone's identity, but their arguments. Any one person can have good arguments and bad arguments. And their bad arguments do not invalidate good arguments insofar as the two are not tangibly related. Your curtain of identity politic labels is a subversive affront to the trivium of liberal arts.

jej

you should probably read more before you hope in to nietzsche. dont just hop into shit without reading the basis of philosophies

>Is /pol/ really that spectrum to hate Milo or McInnes
They're both just Libertarians. Neither of them are particularly right-wing. They're just not left-wing. The enemy of my enemy isn't my friend.

>start with the greeks

books i've read this year, judge me hard.
>bazaar of bad dreams - stephen king
>pet semetary - stephen king
>the stand - stephen king
> 1984 - orwell
> the idiot - dostoevsky
> one flew over the cuckoos nest - ken kesey
>misery - stephen king
> tommyknockers - stephen king

trying to get all of his stuff out of the way with a few things in between to break it up

These are the next 5 I plan on purchasing.

Satantango by Laszlo Krasznahorkai
Arcadia: A novel by Iain Pears
The End of the Road by John Barth
London Field by Martin Amis
Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell

No, /pol/ generally views both of those guys as fags (especially McInnes and the cringey Proud Boys).

My list for 2018

Fiction:
Heart of Darkness
Siddhartha
Stoner
Robinson Crusoe
The Fountains of Paradise
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Wolves of the Calla
The Screwtape Letters
The Stranger

History:
The Unfolding of Language
The Pursuit of Glory
For the Soul of Mankind

Philosophy/Religion:
The Dialogues of Plato
Meditations
Heretics
Orthodoxy
The Phenomenon of Man
Cur Deus Homo
The Dark Night of the Soul
Beyond Good and Evil
The Gay Science

Politics:
Politics by Aristotle
The Prince
The Crisis of the Modern Man
Revolt Against the Modern World
The Culture of Critique
The Bell Curve

Only good books on that list are 1984, Zarathustra and Atlas Shrugged

Might read Dangerous for the lols.

>Neither of them are particularly right-wing. They're just not left-wing.

What kind of echo chamber do you have to live in to believe this? The biggest red flag for /pol/ is believing mainstream Dems and normies are Marxist-Leninists and anyone to the left of Reinhard Heydrich "isn't even that right-wing".

you can read Heart of Darkness before bedtime tonight

I'll do it some other time