Is he based?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TncilnIdiLk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Dont bring that shit, here take it back to /pol/. Hes a cuck who dosent understand the difference between private and personal property.

His book is apparently trash

>In a covenant concluded among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one's own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very purpose of the covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society. Likewise, in a covenant founded for the purpose of protecting family and kin, there can be no tolerance toward those habitually promoting lifestyles incompatible with this goal. They – the advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism – will have to be physically removed from society, too, if one is to maintain a libertarian order.
youtube.com/watch?v=TncilnIdiLk
he's fucken BASED

I feel like most hoppe-posters don't know what a covenant community is

Yes.

bump

Physical Removal is an interesting idea in theory.

no it is not

Its the libertarian equivalent of Leninism