>"Any organization/power structure is primarily focused on the interest of one/the few. No matter the best intentions and mission statements, these are still the intentions of the leader/founder. Never mind corruption—even the most benevolent non-profits are, at their root, essentially self-serving. Truly selfless and ethically unbiased leadership is only attainable via A.I.: no needs, no notions, no emotions, and above all, no desire. Further, truly perfect power structures do not contain people within them; nor are they power structures at all, but rather automatons spanning a universally enabled impartial synthetic ‘populace.’”
Techno-socialism #1
Brandon Rivera
Angel Parker
what's the point then? a lifeless simulacrum of a 'perfect' society running on forever but there are no subjects around to experience it.
Josiah King
"Socialism" without working-class power is not socialism.
Oliver Gray
Humans are too unaesthetic to survive in such a society and should therefore be destroyed.
Samuel Clark
>pure speculation
let me know when you get that AI up and running
Sebastian Williams
>Implying an AI would not develop those human conditions
Wew lad
Christopher Thomas
What could go wrong?
Thomas Carter
interesting
interesting af
watching w/interest i guess
Jordan Cook
Obviously this speculative society would not resemble our own, but there would have to be processes in place necessary to the continuance of the structure
Grayson Thomas
OP again, misread your post. How could A.I. develop a human sense of morality? Sure it would be able to solve complex ethical problems, but in the end the algorithms it uses to make these decisions are based on what we programed them to do, which necessarily precludes our usefulness in an ideal world. It would not evolve to a point in which the A.I. could create its own morals.