What the fuck

get them cheese teeth outta my face, harald. and put on a shirt, you're in public for goodness sake.

The way of men was neckbeard wankery and generation identity was cringy at best

>The way of men
I think it was ok
>generation identity was cringy at best
Agreed and so was archeofuturism
That's all I read

It's a list developed by /pol/, if that doesn't answer your question then you're an idiot

>it's /pol/ therefore it's bad
KYS

The Way of Men is interesting in that it is echoed places like here:

bostonglobe.com/magazine/2017/03/09/the-biggest-threat-facing-middle-age-men-isn-smoking-obesity-loneliness/k6saC9FnnHQCUbf5mJ8okL/story.html

The therapeutic nature of tribalism really is a boon. Also, the author is a homosex that despises gay culture, so that is also interesting. He is basically calling for a renewal of clans and associations of male fellowship as a way to battle declining family values. I thought he made some good points.

the rest is silly trash except evola,
which is mysticism, not racialist.

It seems like a bunch of dumb bullshit. Read the Greeks instead.

Benoist and Evola are pretty interesting. The rest is borderline cringe autism.

Please, don't put Savitri Devi and Linkola next to some MGTOW autists.

>evola

lol

Do you know any racialist books?

Also Dancing in the Glory of Monsters.
Also

Both written by liberals, both authorial voices unable to make the leap to what was really happening, despite it happening all around them.

it probably is the best way to become a gay bear

I'd just read Marcus Aurelius instead.

Seems like a very interesting list to consider at the least.

Can you tell me about Archeofuturism, I was gonna buy it since it seemed interesting
I really don't know too much about it

To be honest: I forgot most of it. All I remember was the namedropping of psychoanalysists and perhaps some philosophers.
The second part has a story with an European guy and an Indian girl, and it described the future.

I would suggest if you can get a hold on it online, and if you want to reread it buying it.

And I don't think my comment does the book any justice because I'm biased in my own way, from being more on the left to my distaste for psychoanalysis.

I thought it was going to be about a way of life that mixes traditional life with modern life, and that is one reason I gave it a try.

While I disagree with Donovan on several points I thought his ideas were more clear and I think they were refreshing.

"/pol/ is wrong" is a pretty good rule of thumb

I've read Morning Crafts and The Way of Men.

Morning Crafts was actually like my first book I read outside of school it is probably the main reason I took up reading as my main hobby. It's basically a book about kids becoming patrician through reading/learning(polymath) and leaving the normies behind.

I'd highly recommend it for anyone wanting to take up reading. It's an easy read and it's basically a story about how a community created outside of normal society would look like if it was created by Veeky Forums.

But, I'm a jungian too and I voted Greens in the Referendum. There's nothing inherently rightwing in Jung's work. I also have many books, but no guns. Not allowed.

>Morning Crafts
I'll give it a shot
Thanks for the input

This list isn't even made by pol it's made by the publisher who sells all these books. Do not fall for this shill meme. I read Morninf Crafts and it was trash