Meritocracy > Nepotism
Prove me wrong.
Meritocracy > Nepotism
Prove me wrong.
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
twitter.com
>Meritocracy>Nepotism
In what sense?
Individuals who have potential in aptitude should not be placed behind another simply because of nepotism.
I don't see how this could not be clear.
>implying the habsburg lip isn't far and away the embodiment and endgame of patrician style
>literally generations in the making
>radiates distinction & class
>w/baked-in fuck you money
nepotism is the clear choice desu
Why would you post that pic? It's a satire about everything wrong with meritocracies.
As Flynn's effect should show you, conditions have a bigger influence than natural aptitude. Following that, under most scenarios, nepotism should form better elites than a meritocracy.
This is a centuries old argument.
And?
Name a meritocracy in history that:
-existed for at least multiple decennia
-had an efficient economy
-had high culture
Protip: you can't.
Meritocracy will inevitably devolve into nepotism.