reading it now and whats the deal with the tripartite soul thing?
Women in the army
I noticed the absolutely retarded false equivalencies as well.
>To harm a man is to make him unjust because of reasons
>Can a musician by his art make men unmusical? No
>Or a horseman by his art make men into bad horsemen? No
>Let's ignore the case where a soldier may, by his art, make other men dead or imprisoned (i.e. bad soldiers)
>Or how a king may, by his art, make other men into subjects (i.e. poor rulers)
>Therefore a just man cannot use justice to harm other people
>QED it is always unjust to harm anyone for any reason
>mfw some Greek pedo "argues" with analogies
Take the Adamspill, fags
t. Foucault
it's a work of philosophy, not a fucking how-to manual. so do some thinking, you mongoloid.
this
>he thinks The Republic is meant to be taken literally
>women in the army
Only bad part to be honest, and if I remember correctly Glaucon said they would stand to the side and throw rocks or something.
yo is that real or a computer animation
What is "real"? How do you define real? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
>unable to understand English
>unable to philosophy
leave