Wow, you read that too? So... are you seeing anyone?

Please delete this embarrasing thread

its strange how a board seemingly dedicated to literature has yet to realize that one of the greatest contributions to literature has already dealt in a "final-blow" way with the "problem" of cuckholdery. Ulysses, I am speaking of. The exact wording of the passages escape me, but they are poignant and clear. Bloom accepts his condition, if I recall also considering and imaging at this very moment the innumerable persons around the globe engaging in conjugal matters in a kind of mass orgy which one need not feel estranged from any more than we should feel ashamed for not being in two places at once. Or at least that's something of the jist I got from it, I can't elaborate atm.

>rationalize a shitty relationship
>"final blow"

Their relationship suffered the blow of the death of the late son Rudy. And yet Bloom makes the best of it, and does not assault his wife for her human errors, that is to say sexual infidelity. He understands the human condition, and grows to understand why people seek the things they seek. It's beautiful really, psychologically clarifying.

t. Shlomo Goldberg

“Mendelssohn was a jew and Karl Marx and Mercadante and Spinoza. And the Saviour was a jew and his father was a jew. Your God…"

Sounds more like acquiescense than actually trying to fix the problem. If the woman goes astray then obviously she finds her man lacking, and vice versa. That's something that should be confronted and not merely waved away as "humans will be humans", nobody learns anything like that.

If you're the one asking then the answer is "Yes, I already am."

"Her man is lacking"

If her man really is lacking in sexual attraction then that can't be fixed. It can only be accepted between the two partners. And really, when it comes down to it, it's not that important a problem to be fixed. Really. Bloom will care for her, and she knows this, and this comforts her, and she appreciates it, but sexual matters are another thing, and are of a level of value less important than you may realise, but that Bloom soon realises. This obsession with virility as a staple of manliness is mere programming. You may overcome it or you may be tormented by it and feel perpetually anxious as to whether you are adequate as a man.

Real men could never fuck and not give a fuck. Like Tesla.

>women
>reading

She has to do that or else she isn't strong and empowered.

>most people these days
>reading

I think that's what you meant

There are always exceptional individuals in either gender

please everyone just need to click the board and start talking there about how women have ruined your life, etc etc

this is a literature board

>unconsciously.

Retard

>word

>rude word

nice

Lacking not only sexual attraction but in the basics of emotional fulfillment. It's incredibly common for cheaters to cheat simply because they feel stifled, bored or unfulfilled with their partner on the emotional level. Having sex is just one part of that.

What you're implying is that a man should be content with being some faceless provider while his woman fucks everything under the bus stop until she gets bored of that too. I can't say that's healthy my guy.

>Real men could never fuck and not give a fuck.

That's fine and well, and what of the woman? Is she free to have all kinds of illicit affairs so long as some poor sap keeps subsidizing it? Does her action not imply some level of "not giving a fuck" about her partner?

Yeah no literature is about how some women are whores.

It seems you're not realizing that he does fulfill emotional needs, the only thing lacking in their relationship now is of a sexual character.

And as I said, when it comes down to it, the sausage-in-clit festival activity is not all that important. It's a kind of irresistible inevitability that, as a human organism, all are drawn towards. Their relationship will persist in a strong way precisely because their is this kind of acceptance.

This whole super-manly "ONLY I CAN FUCK THIS WOMAN" thing is of an ape-ish character. If she wants to experience intercourse with others, there is really not a lot of reason to be upset about this unless you are of a rather low-concept level of awareness about the human condition.

A relationship persisting speaks nothing to its quality.

Beleive me, I'm not into the whole "I own this person" thing, but sex, regardless of what some people choose to think, is a very intimate act thats more than mere flesh grinding. What does it say of a relationship if one party chooses to share that intimacy with anyone other than the one they claim to be committed to? Something isn't adding up, or else both choose to be complicit in dysfunction.

Beside that, physical sex isn't some big overpowering force. Anyone sufficiently mature isn't led around by their gentials. (Which in this case, the woman clearly is. I'd say that also speaks much to the quality of that relationship)

>but sex, regardless of what some people choose to think, is a very intimate act thats more than mere flesh grinding.

sex is not inherently intimate as an activity. The level of intimacy in sex requires more conditions than the general culture knows. Anyone can screw a prostitute for cash, for instance. There is a vast space between that kind of "release valve" intercourse and true love, whatever that may be.

sexual jealousy has been in thing in literature since the beginning of writing, to say it's just some problem for uptight dudes or some marxist shit about private property is completely dishonest

It's a very fertile ground to explore, as might be evident in this conversation.

Every single partner will always be lacking since humans aren't monogamous.

The universe is abusive. The unknown is deceiving.

i want to take a shower but one of my roommates just took an awfully long shower and i wonder if he was fapping, not sure if i want to go in there

>throws tin can at you

Really stimulates the prostate

You want love without the fall. Pure ideology, schniff schniff.

>make the decision for them
Well, that just proves women to be inferior, right? Seriously, that's just fucking retarded

Yo Veeky Forums, redpill me on human sexuality.

>Wow, you're asking me whether or not I'm seeing anyone! Can I eat your booty tonight over a cup of coffee?

> tfw go to an English class carrying WS Merwin's poems
> small Asian girl asks about it
> tell her a shit load about it and read her a poem before class
> afterm class hugs me and gives me her number
> I blow her off

I have a more attractive Asian girlfriend now tho

>This whole super-manly "ONLY I CAN FUCK THIS WOMAN" thing is of an ape-ish character. If she wants to experience intercourse with others, there is really not a lot of reason to be upset about this unless you are of a rather low-concept level of awareness about the human condition.

read inuit mythology. you'll see the internet refuses to do some kinds of porn.

>I only read proud cuck lit for proud cucks like me!

>Things that never happened

It's pretty obvious that poster is a promiscuous woman trying to justify her lack of morality.

>jealous manlets

Sure thing m8.

From what I've experienced Lit girls go for Lit versions of Chad. Unlit Chads mostly fuck unlit girls (which is most girls anyway).

>elaborate atm

I like my ass to mouth simple and unsophisticated.

>women
They are only good for reproduction and nothing else, the Greeks got it right.

I bet women read more than men, but they read young adult stuff mostly

"Hey user, have you read David Copperfield, no? It changed my life, I'll lend it to you, and we can get together and discuss, by the way. I have a boyfriend"

Fuck off.