Start losing argument

>start losing argument
>call opponent a pseud and close thread

can some good white boy just dump al the reaction pics of DFW? Please I want to see this in a thread

Lurk longer

>mfw I deliberately argue without providing any real evidence or reasoning
>mfw no one can successfully refute me because there's basically nothing to refute

>make a mistake or misquote
>hide thread and change board

>enter a thread
>be hostile for no reason

>start losing argument
>call opponent an idiot who doesn't understand the subtlety of my points

>argue with every post without actually posting
>win every time

Troll Stephen King thread by talking about the maze in The Shining.

None of the Veeky Forums wizards notices I'm trolling.

>janitor
>banning anons

hello newfag!

>start losing argument
>shift from being combative to collaborative and come to mutual understanding

It's not hard, retards.

"Go back to /pol/" is the more conditioned response of the pseud.

probably one of the most painful moments in my daily routine

>derail an entire thread by giving health advice to fictional rabbit

OR just the appropriate response for the psueds who invade other boards with their parroted shit they gathered from pol. How do I know you're a butthurt little faggot who is angry at lit for not taking your lowbrow shit seriously?

> blurts out a stock "go back to /pol/" at the slightest hint of cognitive dissonance
> accuses others of 'parroted shit'
Holy cow, even IMAX doesn't project that hard.

haha happens to me all the time

I'm never browsing lit in a summer afternoon again

I have a hunch that there are two types of people who shout the pseud hymn of "go back to /pol/": 1) jews, 2) public school goyim under the age of 16.

I literally do this when I make typos in otherwise intelligent posts.

i took a creative nonfiction course taught by David Wallace back in '94

>creative nonfiction
ha, classic david!

Why the fuck would any of us read Stephen King?

>not deliberately making gypos to distract pseuds

>collaborate and come to mutual understanding
>continue argument from another angle pretending to be someone else

...

I would have done it, but I'm black

>see a debate going on
>ignore the wider purpose of the post or debate and point out an inaccuracy in someones comment
>increasingly careen thread into my unrelated argument(s) until it doesn't resemble the purpose of the thread at all

should I even read infinite jest? I saw it at someones house and thumbed through it and it looked like a huge pretentious meme. I have read a number of his essays which are good though.