What are some good books on American history?

Nice meme

>>/pol/

>t. beta male (unpaid) Veeky Forums content creator

Presents Hoover as 100% stability oriented operator, very interesting.

Also, Sherman's Memoirs.

>Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee
Probably the on only book I had to put down because it was depressing the fuck out of me.

1491 topped it

>A People's History of the United States
>Zinn was born to a Jewish immigrant family in Brooklyn on August 24, 1922

Every single fucking time. You idiots think "the jews" is just a meme but every time you get someone creating anti-American propaganda, there is a jew behind it.

I said American history. Indians aren't any different from all the other fauna we tramped over, and I'm not going to read a book pretending that the poor, peaceful Indian tribes lost their land after refusing to fight for it.

>american history

Why would you care about a country with the most boring history in the world

>Indians aren't any different from all the other fauna we tramped over

This is where /pol/ fags expose themselves. You can make arguments for niggers, but niggers are Pueblo, Nez Perce, Mississippian culture, Algonquin peoples, etc.

And they certainly arent Mayan or Inca or pre-Inca Sipan culture. You look like an uneducated retard.

*arent

>muh delusions

Hoover was a faggot
youtube.com/watch?v=3N3Vg5l-ITU

>Ms. Rosenstiel claimed that in 1958 she and her husband went to a party at a New York hotel, where they met Hoover and McCarthy witch-hunt lawyer Roy Cohn. Hoover, whom Cohn introduced as "Mary," was supposedly wearing a wig, a black dress, lace stockings, and high heels. Hoover went into a bedroom, took off his skirt to reveal a garter belt, and had a couple of blond boys--one wearing rubber gloves--"work on him with their hands." Cohn and Hoover then watched while Lewis Rosenstiel had sex with the boys. A year later Ms. Rosenstiel attended another party at the same hotel; this time Hoover wore a red dress and a black feather boa. He had one of the blond boys, who were now dressed in leather, read to him from a Bible while the other "played" with him. Hoover then grabbed the Bible, tossed it down, and told the first boy to join in.

> In 1971, Resnick and an associate talked with the writer Pete Hamill in the Galeria Bar at Caesars Palace. They spoke of Meyer Lansky as a genius, the man who "put everything together,"--and as the man who "nailed J. Edgar Hoover." "When I asked what they meant," Hamill recalled, "they told me Lansky had some pictures--pictures of Hoover in some kind of gay situation with Clyde Tolson. Lansky was the guy who controlled the pictures, and he had made his deal with Hoover--to lay off. That was the reason, they said, that for a long time they had nothing to fear from the FBI."
...
>According to Pollock, Lansky and Edgar cooperated in the mid-fifties, when Las Vegas casino operator Wilbur Clark moved to Cuba. "Meyer brought Clark down to Havana," Pollock said. "I was against him coming. But I understand Hoover asked Meyer to bring Clark down. He owed Clark something. I don't know what. . . . There was no serious pressure on Meyer until the Kennedys came in. And even then Hoover never hurt Meyer's people, not for a long time."
...
>Also in the sixties a wiretap picked up a conversation between two mobsters in which, curiously, Lansky was referred to as "a stool pigeon for the FBI." The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, taping a conversation between a criminal in Canada and Lansky in the United States, were amazed to hear the mob chieftain reading from an FBI report that had been written the previous day.
...
>At least once, Lansky worked alongside U.S. intelligence officers on exactly the sort of operation likely to turn up smear material on prominent public men. In 1942, he arranged for the surveillance of a homosexual brothel in Brooklyn suspected of being the target of German agents. "Clients came from all over New York and Washington," Lansky recalled, "and there were some important government people among them. . . . If you got hold of the names of the patrons you could blackmail them to death . . . take some pictures through a hole in the wall or a trick mirror and then squeeze the victim for money or information."

>Presents Hoover as 100% stability oriented operator
So, inaccurately?

History of the Great American Fortunes by Gustavus Myers, 1895. He is a (maybe jewish?) socialist, but definitely worth a read.

This book taught me that the American Government wanting the land you lived on was basically a death sentence in the 1800s.

>refusing to fight for it
You should read more.

To further elaborate, I believe Lansky was probably a key asset to Israeli intelligence agencies and probably how they were extorting info from the FBI in that period of time

I found this info on a pro-Zionist blog:
elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2013/04/meyer-lansky-gangster-and-zionist.html
>After the horrors of the Holocaust were apparent, Lansky felt the need to help his fellow Jews. In 1946, Lansky made a strategic decision: he and his friends throughout the United States must help bring the survivors from Europe to Palestine, and help establish the Jewish state. Lansky gave the order.
>Lansky's cousin elaborates: "The goal was to help establish the Jewish state. It meant to buy the ships, help in gathering Jews from all over Europe, bringing them to Israel, to transfer funds to Israel, to arm the military. Whether it was buying Czech planes or training the paratroopers, all of it cost money - and Lansky collected all the money. It was Lansky's gift. He was a man of power and influence, and had the ability to help establish the Jewish state. He was in contact with many people and helped in collecting funds. It is important to emphasize that a lot of Jews not related to the mafia gave money, but those who controlled it, these were people who were close to the leadership of the syndicate."
>Lansky's friends managed to get ships from Panama to ship weapons to Palestine, and Teddy Kollek - later mayor of Jerusalem - met with many of the mobster leaders who cooperated because of Lansky's interest. Even Bugsy Siegel, who was not interested in Judaism at all, responded when he heard that Jews were fighting.

Most sources don't seem to usually talk about the role of the American Jewish Mafia in financing the creation of Israel, you have to peace a lot of this info together

I wonder if you've read the darn thing, because it sounds like you adopted that line right from your sentiments about other people's opinions.

You may enjoy primary sources. Start investigating citations and themed bibliographies in your area of interest. If you don't know where to begin, visit Project Gutenberg and search for something.

Check out Dunning school of history reg. the subjugation of the american negro.

readsettlers.org

Wait so the Hoover cross dressing shit is true?

I got the claim from Anthony Summers book The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover

anthonysummersandrobbynswan.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/j-edgar-from-clint-eastwood-and-that-cross-dressing-story/

Why?
Why do you think its anti-American?
Edgy

The only ones left alive are cowards. That explains the general stock of the indian.

No, he's right. It's an inherent part of jewish nature to attack covertly and overtly their host society. We have centuries of evidence and it's the reason they've been kicked out so many times. It is therefore you who is either delusional or uninformed for not being aware of this.

Hearsay and innuendo
The reason why the FBI didnt touch the mob for a long time because that wasn't the FBIs job
The FBI was created as the political police
Its job was political repression
It was too busy with COINTELPRO in the 50s and 60s to bother with organised crime
But the same is true for the 30s and 40s

Once its domestic surveillance was revealed in the 1970s, the reading of the letters to MLK encouraging him to commit suicide in senate hearings and all that, it had a PR problem and had to scramble to find a valid excuse to keep going

And suddenly it does start going after the mob

What does A People's History of America attack?

Well that's because all the ones with a backbone were killed so each successive generation was raised by cowards and women. Or is that what you're saying?

It's less of an overt attack and more of a covert subversion. What you're getting in a book like this is what jews want America to be and not what it was intended to be or what it's in the interests of whites to be. This means a multicultural proposition nation that shames whites for various things like slavery, while leaving out the part about jews having overwhelming influence over the slave trade, and leaving out any notion that whites should be proud of conquering such a massive space and erecting a prosperous nation on its barbarous foundations.

>a covert subversion
What is the covert subversion?
>What you're getting in a book like this is what jews want America to be and not what it was intended to be
How does looking at history of people unrepresented do this?
>or what's in the interests of whites to be
What about everyone else in the country? What about the poor white mill workers? You claim to be for whites and claim the book is against whites, but it represents many unrepresented white people
So what's the deal?
>This means a multicultural proposition nation
Is America not multicultural, with its indigenous population and African Americans and migrants?
>that shames whites for various things like slavery
Is slavery something to be celebrated?
>while leaving out the part about jews having overwhelming influence over the slave trade
Only the seller is guilty? The purchaser has no responsibility?
A moment ago you complained about whites being made to feel guilty for slavery
Meaning you don't consider it a crime
But now you criticise Jews for selling slaves
Meaning you feel they committed a crime
So please tell me how can it be a crime to sell slaves, but not to own them?
>and leaving out any notion that whites should be proud of conquering such a massive space
The conquest was of a people already living here, it was achieved through massacres and genocide and ethnic cleansing and forced relocation
Why should this be celebrated?
>erecting a prosperous nation
Built on exploitation, often of white people
>on its barbarous foundations
The Haudenosaunee (more commonly known as Iroqois), Mound Builders, and numerous others were advanced civilisations living in permanent settlements, they were farmers and not warlike.

>while leaving out the part about jews having overwhelming influence over the slave trade
>>Only the seller is guilty? The purchaser has no responsibility?

This is something they don't cover in American history. Jews bought and sold slaves at a massive rate. Why do you think they're so powerful?

>I won't answer the question

How did the Jews control the trade exactly? They'd been kicked out of Spain and Portugal and I doubt that there were many on the African west coast around modern day Niger and Cameroon and Ivory Coast

Are you repeating these anti-white jewish narratives because you're jewish?

>okay sure I said something that was factually incorrect, but what about my other non-existent points?

nice try, shlomo

>I said something factually incorrect

You say white people are made to feel shame for slavery
While criticising Jews apparently undocumented role in the slave trade
So either you have double standards or you believe its alright to buy slaves but not to sell them

Which is it?

What is anti-white?
What was anti-white there?

That's the double standard that is the problem. Please reread and try to make sense of

You're the one advocating the double standard
That its wrong for Jews to sell slaves
But whites should not be 'shamed' in your terminology for having purchased and used slaved

These positions aren't mutually exclusive, you're just an idiot.

>all whites today are held accountable for slavery of a small amount of whites
>jews are not held accountable for engaging in the slave trade at a much, much higher rate

I don't know how to make this any simpler.

The narrative you are pushing is a jewish anti-white narrative -- so why are you pushing it? Since you didn't answer and are defending jewish behavior itt, the assumption now is that you're jewish.

Whites should no longer be listening to these anti-white narratives jews like this try to promote. We have no reason to feel bad about building a prosperous nation on a barbarous land, and we need to start to take it back, first by sending these anti-white jews back to the desert where they belong.

Many whites today try to downplay and mitigate the slavery and defend the honor of the slave holding states and culture
Many deny the root cause of black inequality in slavery and criminalising black life

That's completely unrelated to what I said. Now I'm 100% certain you're a jew. Get out of here.

I cannot answer something I can't understand

What is Jewish and anti-white about considering what happened to the indiginous population?
What is Jewish and anti-white about considering what happened to the slaves?
What is Jewish and anti-white about looking at the factory laborers and mill workers and farmers - majority of them white - being exploited to make the wealth for an elite few?

>building a prosperous nation
Should you not look at whose back that prosperity was built on?

>barbarous land

But it wasn't. There were highly organised societies living in permanent settlements. Some consider the Haudenosaunee federation of tribes to have provided inspiration for the US Constitution.

Its not unrelated
Its the root

And no one is 'holding all whites accountable' nor is anyone trying to shame anyone
I think you describe your own uncomfortableness with the topic by describing the discussion as shaming, its a way for you you externalise the feelings and blame someone else for making you feel bad about something you know was wrong and has never been addressed

>Get out of here.

You're not a mod and this isn't your safe space

> And no one is 'holding all whites accountable' nor is anyone trying to shame anyone

Then you're clearly blind if you haven't seen all the negros begging for gibbs because their great great great great great grandmother was property. Where do you think that money will come from? What do you think affirmative action is? Why do you think that the dumbest nog will have an edge over an asian man in college applications?

Look at how jews craft these narratives to try and make whites feel guilty for being successful conquerors. We fought the indians and we won. Jews brought slaves to the US and sold them to white landowners, and now their descendants are trying to put the collective blame on us. Fuck that. We need to no longer accept these attempts by jews to make us feel bad about our past. We need to instead feel proud of it, and export these jews to Israel. They are subversives who do not belong in white societies.

CTRL+F oxford
>0 results
OP the Oxford's History of the United States series is really good and has a bunch of different titles so you can pop in where you want. I recommend Robert Middlekauff's A Glorious Cause which covers the period of the revolutionary war if you don't know where to start, if you want to really sink your teeth in it's very comprehensive and a step above the typical light more narrative focused introductory books people usually recommend, while not being too dense to follow for an average joe. If you follow the references and mentions of different authors and source material and all that it will also expose you to a shit ton more reading to branch off into. I'm guessing you're a /pol/tard and if it's true you'll probably enjoy a lot of the writers of that time that helped inspire the founding fathers.

>I want an American history book but I want it to ignore a massive part of American history

really makes you think