Yeah, Homo Sacer and State of Exhibition are great but pretty dense, especially the first.
Colton Rogers
Any of his other works easier to get into maybe?
Camden Cox
Jordan B. Peterson Peter Moyneux
Sebastian Hernandez
What's your criteria for contemporary?
Christian Bennett
Saul Kripke
Juan Torres
Currently living or at least active within the last 10 years.
Nicholas Hernandez
>Grindr Greg
Stay away from that faggot
Ryan Torres
He's a homosexual pagan, you can't get a much better candidate for philosophy. Check him out.
Daniel Young
He's a 2-faced fraud. He changes his act depending on the audience he's talking to.
He's really just a liberal who's afraid that the brown homophobes are going to take away his bath-houses when they take over.
Brody Walker
Luciano Floridi, look up his lectures on YT or Onlife Manifesto
Owen Jenkins
Seconding this. Never see him mentioned here really.
Caleb Williams
No, Homo Sacer isn't that difficult (even if it is, it's pretty hard to approach his work as a whole without understanding the paradoxes he puts forward in the book), his process of thought is extremely clear. Things only start to get more complicated with Stasis.
Mason Brown
>lol u liv naked cuz u can't take a shit in the middle of the street >what's living? lol dunno, nerd
truly the mind of the millennium
Grayson King
You sound mad my friend, maybe you can't deal with the politicization of your body by the state you claim to love?
Nathaniel King
Nigger, I consent to that. So I can have, yknow, running water and the possibility of not getting stabbed when I get out of my mud hut
Benjamin Phillips
Alone.
Gavin Gomez
You consent to that because you don't really have any option, it's not even "consent". The same way you "consent", people without running water and/or people who get stabbed are still forced to consent as well.
Andrew Turner
I do have an option, and that is to run from society. Live isolated innawoods. However, when I do that, I become a liable to repercussions from the State because I've become a threat to society, which comes from the fact I'm subverting its institutions. So it's only logical that I be dealt as such. Those people consent to several other opportunities of living in society, and the possibility of them having their conditions improved. Furthermore, ending the State which governs them would aggravate such situation
Cameron Barnes
>I've become a threat to society oh no user lives innawoods we're doomed
>ending the State who said anything about ending the state
Alexander Foster
Martha Nussbaum.
Brayden Robinson
timothy morton
Jason Reed
An actual who?
Josiah Garcia
clean your room
Jaxson Cox
Agamben is good, but very hard since he constantly draws on the entire canon, presupposing your knowledge of the stuff he discusses. Most often though it's Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida and Benjamin.
Chase Sanchez
not that user but it is indeed a threat to the state. just like the sudden emancipation of the press w/ smartphone cameras on police everywhere. it's not the individual who is a danger, but the possibility that everyone will pick up on a new method of living that doesn't the state's monopoly on water/energy/order. technology could easily make it happen.
Jackson Hall
>new method of living that doesn't the state's monopoly on water/energy/order it's called law of the land for a reason
>easily i'll have you know the inside of houses caves cars ships planes etc. are the sovereign's land too in case you were thinking he didn't know what he was doing
as user said >you don't really have any option, it's not even "consent"
Elijah Nguyen
this.
Michael Wood
hes one of the object oriented ontology guys now
fun to read, seems relevant to things going on in the world today