What the fuck is his problem?

and where is his piece on the coming neo-feudalism of elites in walled megacities while the plebs toil in the wasteland. I can't find it

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gkzy1hKMYJc
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LJMLHhI3Yeouy-3jiAKcvuB
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LJrKca3SQznL9dua2blgcIq
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LKDtYMw6QQucqg4AJMXt1SV
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LIEudhL5LcQ2Z4b1iBNTONP
shutdownld50.tumblr.com/post/158928600961/no-platform-for-land-on-nick-lands-racist
vincentgarton.com/
therealmovement.wordpress.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

he wants to watch robots fuck his wife and then pay them for it.

His face is too long. I'm intimidated.

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=gkzy1hKMYJc

this is from his red ice interview. really liked that and really like this vid

Is there some way to get the 2nd hour of the interview for free?

it may eventually show up on concen.org, but it's not there yet,

I had a nightmare about this guy recently
he gives me a deep disturbing feeling whenever I see him/read him, anyone else get this?

Here are more lectures if your interested, these are from the NCRP classes he taught.

The Concept of Acceleration
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LJMLHhI3Yeouy-3jiAKcvuB

Bitcoin and Philosophy
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LJrKca3SQznL9dua2blgcIq

Qwernomics
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LKDtYMw6QQucqg4AJMXt1SV

Outer Edges (Incomplete, anyone have links to the rest of the unlisted videos?)
youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LIEudhL5LcQ2Z4b1iBNTONP

yes

Thank you

What is the reputation of the NCRP like? Does anyone know why Land no longer teaches there? I went on its website and found the organization to be a bit enigmatic.

Yeah, he got pushed out because of his tweeting/writing about "Human Biodiversity" and other topics deemed forbidden. It was outside pressure, not from NCRP administration, but they had to protect their credibility to the mainstream left.

To Land's credit, his lectures were very civil. He stayed away from his controversial views on genetics, kept to the subject matter of his lectures and had no problem teaching about and using "leftist" continental theory in his lectures.

In the 'Concept of Acceleration' lecture series, some of the participating students are authors of the 'Alt-Woke Manifesto', a left-accelerationist manifesto that was against Land and NRx. He engaged with them in good faith, though they weren't particularly friendly. About half-way through the lecture series, the NCRP had issued the statement (pic related) ousting him, but the class still has a great spirit, lots of interesting discussion.

I don't blame the NCRP. They're small, and they were targeted by a particularly nasty campaign of outsiders (Shutdown LD50). Reza and others are still teaching there, seems like a cool program, I just hope it doesn't keep falling prey to outrage politics of Vampire Castle.

I'm seriously considering doing a video meme about neoreactionary Accelerationism with the new Sonic game trailer. Because of the whole 'gotta go fast' shtick

Like Land would be Sonic, Moldbug Tails, Carlyle (or Deleuze) would be Knuckles and Aleksander Dugin would be the villain

...

I've never been able to find much appeal in NRx. Moldbug is of course a Jew, and it's telling to mentally replace "The Cathedral" with "The Synagogue" in his writings. Similarly Land is basically a shabbos goy who is unable or unwilling to name the Jew and just calls everything Communist, but he has a Jewish wife and thus Jewish kids so it's to be expected. So many words were spent by both parties on critiquing democracy as being rule by idiots and complaining about third-world immigrants as imported voters for left-wing parties, while making fun of the average alt-righter for blaming the ZOG for everything. Of course, the general population really did oppose third-world immigration from the beginning and most politicians in representative democracy really are (((bought and paid for))), so the /pol/tards were closer to being correct in the end. Go figure.

There just doesn't seem to be anything appealing about the sort of society that these people propose.

The main appeal of NRx to me is the right of Exit and privatized government that allows each ideological group to peacefully part ways without staying trapped in the same jurisdiction and fighting brutally for control over it.

So the Alt-Righters could have their ethnostate, the leftish tree-huggers their cosmopolitan paradise etc - as the market would provide it if there was a demand for it

In theory, people with ideological differences can agree to part ways and form separate countries without the rest of the NRx baggage. This does not happen all that often in reality, everyone wants to expand.

The only plausible way to prevent this is to have each micro-state be equipped with nuclear weapons. Given the number of nuclear near-misses between the US and Russia alone, this is nothing if not asking for disaster.

I could see the US, but with direct democracy in each state and the ability to form more states guaranteed by the Federal government. Perhaps you have ~100 states instead of 50. I guess I am inspired here by Prince Hans-Adam of Liechtenstein's book, but I don't agree with him on everything (especially not the open borders stuff).

I've always found Land's interest in NRx to be the least interesting part of his writing.

Capitalist governments have no interest in losing population, natural resources, or industry infrastructure. Schism isn't a good business plan generally. Second, just because you divide the world into different ideological states, there is little reason to think that anyone's children would be interested in the same ideology as their parents. So a mandatory part of these microstates will be freedom of movement and ability to 'buy a new nationality'. Sounds great, but the number of ideologies that are interested in selling nationality (as opposed to inheriting it because of ethnic/historic precedent) is very small.

Further, it seems that capitalism works best on monopolized, gigantic scales. If capitalism is really in control, it will keep consolidating.

jesus christ i thought for the last few years thats what he looked like but i finally looked him up on youtube and he looks like a fat american now

This is a bully-free zone

>it's telling to mentally replace "The Cathedral" with "The Synagogue"
his whole point is that 'cathedralism' is a form of protestantism. it's unitarian universalist utopian bullshit in the christian socialist vein--go read a women's kkk pamphlet; they were the ones pushing public education even though they were anti-jewish. It's irrelevant to the nomenclature that the leadership of the cathedral is heavily jewish. the architecture of the whole thing predates them.

more or less this

you sound like a would-be member of the pirate party. Land doesn't believe soil is a necessary part of a political order. Singapore, Japan, and HK lack natural resources. They're still successful, and the fact that their citizens live on said rocks is mostly incidental.

>Further, it seems that capitalism works best on monopolized, gigantic scales.
this is only because of IP law. just get rid of it. Oligopolies, however, are natural.


Anyways, /pol/ is right to emphasize the racial/cultural component of politics, but that's only valuable insofar as it increases productivity (which im sure both MM and NL can get behind). it's not a good in-and-of itself

productivity and aggregate social welfare*

>his whole point is that 'cathedralism' is a form of protestantism. it's unitarian universalist utopian bullshit in the christian socialist vein--go read a women's kkk pamphlet; they were the ones pushing public education even though they were anti-jewish. It's irrelevant to the nomenclature that the leadership of the cathedral is heavily jewish. the architecture of the whole thing predates them.
and this is exactly what you'd expect from a Jew, conveniently ignoring that this line of thought accomplished many good things before being poisoned by Jewish influence. For instance, protestants pre-WW2 in America were obsessed with building a better society through eugenics and were turbo-racists, which many people affiliated with NRx would probably like. Anti-racism is a relatively new (and Jewish) invention that sent the ruling class down the wrong path by taking advantage of their tendency to fall into purity spirals. it's just dishonest to not mention Jewish influence when critiquing the Cathedral (Synagogue).

please don't feed the jewish conspiracy troll

One time I had a dream where I was at this swanky dinner party. Schopenhauer was there. And he was scowling at me

>and where is his piece on the coming neo-feudalism of elites in walled megacities while the plebs toil in the wasteland
master of whisperers sounds about right

>anything criticizing a certain group is deemed a conspiracy theory

what in the name of fuck allows them to think all those incompatible systems would live in harmony and wouldn't compete for regional/world hegemony?

what?

I saw Nick Land at a grocery store in Shanghai yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.

He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”

I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen Milky Ways in his hands without paying.

The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.

When she took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me. I don’t even think that’s a word. After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

Thats crazy. The shit happened to me this morning with Saul Kripke in Princeton NJ.

rational actors
nuclear/biological weapons deterrance

Is that guy Ted Bundy

they really don't look alike

/pol/ catholic/orthodox-larpers would disagree. He's also spot on about whiggism's protestant connection.

Eugenics was always a progressive position, and it still is; those at the top of the economic foodchain just realized that dysgenics is more suitable to their purposes.--and it's easily justifiable through a misapplication of scripture.

Karl Marx identified the relationship between protestants and jews: "The Jew has emancipated himself in a Jewish manner, not only because he has acquired financial power, but also because, through him and also apart from him, money has become a world power and the practical Jewish spirit has become the practical spirit of the Christian nations. The Jews have emancipated themselves insofar as the Christians have become Jews."

If prods hadnt prostrated themselves before Mammon, this might not have happened. If you want to see an obvious historical occurrence of SJWism, look up Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth.

Moldbug and Carlyle aren't accelerationists.

We should probably slow down the pace of Land threads. Too much exposure and he'll start to be regarded as a meme, and then actual discussion will be impossible. Let's keep it on the down low.

Are you saying we should...decelerate?

jej

it's too late for that

This. Most people, in first contact, and also others like Bannon, alt right-ies, white supremacists, etc. would not go near Land with a 10 ft pole if they actually understood the endgame here. NRx might be an end goal for some like Moldbug but for Land it's just a rather flimsy step towards Extinction and assimilating into the Capital.

His "problem" is nothing that the NCRP and Warwick would be able to point out to the masses in a simple and meaningful way. Because it takes a lot of downward spiralling into madness to turn the Man x Capital struggle upside down, and actually side with the Capital. The guy is a sinophile in Shanghai ffs, and I bet he can't wait to see all the chinks becoming ma-chinks for good

too late for memes, too late for everything. Fat Man is still on the bridge and hostages are all dead

>he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face
This is my favorite part of the copypasta. No matter how many variations I read this part always makes me smile.

Please do it, I will be glad to watch it

>tfw we're going so fast that there is nothing to deliberately accelerate on any meaningful level

time to sit back and enjoy the memes desu

desu we need more land and acceleration memes

Land's idiolect makes everything amusing desu.

I'm dumb, can someone explain that picture to me? I'm already familiar with the trolley problem meme and accelerationism but I'm not seeing how they correlate

It's too late to explain anything.

You, a small brain: burned popcorn on stove
Land, ascended sinofuturist: Attempted to cook popcorn in the skillet for the children. A pathetic mess. Black necrosis, a heat fucked chaos.

I like Nick Land but his Twitter bio sounds like the lyrics to some edgy Linkin Park song

>COLDNESS BE MY GOD

The difference is that he means very real things by it though.

"We have scarcely begun to define the problem in these terms". It isn't clear what the fatman solution would be, it isn't clear who is tied to the tracks, it isn't even clear where exactly the train is headed. "It would be surprising if there was still time to [define the terms of the problem of Acceleration]"

The Trolley is Techno-Capitalism. The people on the tracks are human extinction, or more optimistically, a human zoo, a nature reserve maintained by Techno-Capitalism in which humanity will be the focus of conservation efforts. The Fat Man is whatever political or philosophical solution that could be presented in order to decelerate evolution of Techno-Capitalism, but no one has yet identified what the solution could even be.

The classic Trolley problem is "Timeless". It assumes that a rational human subject has time to weigh the cost and benefits of sacrificing the fat man, against the survival of the people on the tracks. "Would you kill Hitler to prevent the Holocaust?" assumes a full knowledge of the cost and benefit, and the ability and position to make that judgement. The Trolley Problem is Ethics devoid of Time. Land is arguing we may not have time remaining to fully grasp the consequences of acceleration, it is likely too late.

...

it's actually a really good point he makes here

>tfw you wake up hungover after drinking at the bar and you remember ranting about technology and human extinction when your friends were just trying to talk about Charlottesville.

That's actually a pretty good take on it though, people get caught up in the minute details of virtue signalling while we're all getting raped to deathby the alien force we're giving birth to.

It didn't go over well. My take is that whatever grievance identity politics were on display, they were projections of a deeper problem. That anyone who screams about racial genocide (on either side) is subconsciously voicing discontent about a future that was promised vis-a-vis consumer capitalism, and how that future isn't going to happen. Put two monkeys in a metal cage and electrify it, the monkeys begin biting each other.

It's telling to me that the weapon of choice was a car. 1.4 million people died in car accidents in 2013, it's been steadily rising since the introduction of cellphones. Everyone treats this like it is natural, like getting eaten by a jaguar in the jungle.

Yeah... this wasn't received well.

Anyone got a link to those tweets?

shutdownld50.tumblr.com/post/158928600961/no-platform-for-land-on-nick-lands-racist

Here's the Shutdown LD50 article on Nick Land that sparked his firing. See the tweet at the top.

>admires tech for its ability to create the fash AI
>tech ends up becoming just another red guard infested sector

Wewdiepie

You must.

Don't worry user, Neo-China has not bought the universalist-egalitarian meme and will someday destroy the Baizuo by wresting control of Capital from them

ugh, one of the most obnoxious effects Land has had recently is the popularization of the term 'baizuo'.

And no, Neo-China will not control Capital. The relationship is the opposite, Capital now control's 'Communist' China. This is Acceleration 101.

They sound like boring cunts desu.

...

Wait till you're past that stage...

he's not wrong

picrel made me think and lel

Been writing some stuff that I can't publish under my own name, made a twitter account with a cool psuedonym. What are cool accelerationist twitters to follow?

Those are all good points, you should get more interesting friends desu.

did he have his head leaning on his hand?

Well isn't that a cheerful thought.

> tfw your metabolism decelerates

Look up the people who follow Land.

Weapons and confederations

>1 billion people = not popular because I haven't heard of it
>'communist'
lmfao

I don't think he looks fat ???

he has gone from cutting edge suave british man to asian sex tourist in my mind now desu

i want to go back, he literally looks like someone from that mail order bride louis theroux documentary

I've been talking about this kind of thing for a while now, was wondering if there was anybody else thinking the same thing.
How does Land differ from anarcho-capitalists? A network of private governments operating via contract is essentially anarcho-capitalism.

Me, desu

I really, really like this image

I have begun my foray into the accelerationist twittersphere. So far, Vincent Garton and Jehu have seemed interesting.

vincentgarton.com/
therealmovement.wordpress.com/

>So the Alt-Righters could have their ethnostate, the leftish tree-huggers their cosmopolitan paradise etc - as the market would provide it if there was a demand for it

You're joking right? People have children who disagree with them, don't want to abandon their like-minded friends in Slaveryburg by moving to McDonald's Municipality and decide to transform society from the inside in the image that they believe to be ideal.

Also, why the fuck would Imperialistville stay out of anyone else's business? Why would Christianville not proselytize to the other regions?

The 'Market' does not profit from this dimwitted scheme. Capitalism does not meet needs or demands but transmutates and truncates human need to fit a scheme that maintains the amassing of capital.

>rational actors

If they were all rational actors, why wouldn't their societies be identical?

>therealmovement.wordpress.com/
That seems just like the usual Marxist drivel.

Not the most coherent blogger I've ever read. But anyone who claims 'fascism is the fastest way to achieve communism" is kind of interesting in my mind, especially if they're black.

>Capitalism does not meet needs or demands but transmutates and truncates human need to fit a scheme that maintains the amassing of capital.

It does both, idiot.

>"it’s little wonder that his philosophy is inseparable from the racism that has always accompanied capitalism as an integral dynamic"

It's amazing that Communists are still allowed to exist in public discourse when they openly promote and actively work towards the destruction of the core structures of current power.

Will there be a time when they are cracked down on? Or are we just fucked?

Look, I'm not impressed with the SDLD50 statement either. But they surely don't represent 'all communists' or even all leftists. Further, any kind of schism is a good thing. We need people testing the strength of dominant ideologies, so that they either grow or die. The Culture War is an evolutionary playing field for ideology.

So by all means, crack down on the communists, but do so knowing that you needed them to test your power. Drop the victim complex, drop the outrage, proceed from a position of determination and emotional coldness.

Does the farmer curse the weeds the grow in his field? Only a stupid farmer.

I think neither of the options you present will ever happen. Land does not seek to promote capitalism, he simply sees it as an "arrow of time" situation where capital has already won over humanity, which is where these people fail to grasp the jump in thought from your typical far right/neolib philosophy. And this is also where communists and others come into play: as being mere increases in the spectrum of option of markets. Are they revolutionary? Yes. Are they promoting the destruction of the very thing allowing them to exist (i.e capital)? Also yes. Are they ever going to succeed? Nope, not as long as they are within the system.

The people spilling this discourse are wetting their butts with plenty of the capitalist juice. They are high brow academics, politicians, and social justice marketeers looking to somehow break a game by playing by the game's rules. They are trying to find bugs without actually doing anything outside of the software's purity of purpose. We do not need to crack them down, and it is actually effective that their nil voices continue to echo inside the chamber of hypocrisy.

It really and profoundly doesn't do either. Whatever you have on your table right now, even the food, is a precise transmutation and truncation of what would be a real desire, but is instead turned into economical value through commodity fetishism. That doesn't mean that your needs and demands are necessarily not being met, but by all means, if they are, it is not a feature nor a purpose of the capital.

>Are they ever going to succeed? Nope, not as long as they are within the system.

This is a big point of debate among Left/Acc and left communists/anarchists. Whether or not technology can be divorced from techno-capitalism. Technology surely predates capitalism, but it's the mercantile world that allowed it to explode. Left Accelerationists are, non-ironically, pushing for what they call "Fully Automated Luxury Communism", literal technological utopia where no one is forced to work to live, but rather works because they want to use their time that way or otherwise doesn't work.

A big point of contention are ideas around the 'virtue of work', and that traditional communists (what an oxymoron) insist that work gives a person self-worth, but capitalism exploits that inherent self-worth through degrading conditions and terms. L/ACC instead says 'no', work should not be idealized, the point of technology should be to overcome physical toil.

It's a nice idea. And theoretically, there isn't any reason to imagine that techno-utopia, fully automated luxury communism isn't possible, but there is little reason in my mind to be optimistic about that actually coming to pass.

>that goofy headset

AHAHAHAHAHHAHA

tHiS iS aCcEleRaTiOn

he's not fat but he looks generally slovenly considering he's supposed to be some kind of shaman of the future

Accelerated ageing.

huh.. so this is the power of accelerationism

if there is such a thing as a "shaman of the future" you can bet your ass they are going to be a slob.