With liberals beginning to censor everything, which works of fiction can we expect banned in the near future?

Yeah. I wanted to go back and corner the market on google stocks but I fucked up.

As a young lad I would look up the forbidden books, so surely it will backfire

ITT ridiculous americans

see

>which is what liberals are doing and have done to an enormous amount of content.

Name three (3) specific instances.

Whoever is in charge of approving books for school libraries is failing miserably. I read so many erotic and demented books in my middle school library.
First time I experienced ejaculation was while reading a page describing sex. Good times.

>being blacklisted from republishing or deleted from the Internet
[citation needed]

both sides are shit anyway, one does for "MUH MORALS MUH CHILDREN" and the other for "MUH OPRESSION MUH FEELS"

What books

I don't even remember what I read from the school library. Just a lot of anne mccaffrey.
My librarian read us Where the Red Fern Grows and Tailypo, both of which were mildly traumatizing. Tailypo more so. Fuckin'... Tailypo.

Mein Kampf (banned in Germany)
Tarnsman of Gor (blacklisted from republishing by feminists)
dailystormer.com (deleted from the regular Internet and even targeted by Tor, the same people who claim there is nothing they can do about child pornography)

Obviously. I said "content" not "book."

>Mein Kampf (banned in Germany)

bbc.com/news/world-europe-38495456

>Tarnsman of Gor (blacklisted from republishing by feminists)

It's funny you immediately move on to obscure sci-fi for fat virgin nerds. Official reasoning of why it wasn't republished was shit sales, and to me, with this sort of book, that seems much more plausible than communist-cultural-marxist-bolshevist-feminazis.

>dailystormer.com

Not a book.

That's 1/3 max, even that is questionable. Go ahead, name three more.

I've got a better solution, stop spending time on /pol/. It will be healthier for you.

youtube.com/watch?v=yUq2d2OFRkk

>MUH MUH BIBLE AND BAD WURDS

Darconville's Cat for example. It was nominated for a National Book Award. The author won a Lannan Foundation grant, and it's his best known work. However features a lot of misogyny and hasn't been published since 1996.

You mean conservative. Saying liberals wanted to censor things is an oxymoron, they are conservatives masquerading as liberals who don't even know what liberalism is.

>hasn't been published since 1996.
You do realize there probably billions of books that have been published- they can't keep re-publishing all of them.

Also, I just googled it and it's all over amazon.

>implying those people know what the word liberal means
>implying they read
you know canon is just porn right?

You don't know what liberal or conservative means, I see.

>generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press,

banning books is a conservative idea no matter what you try to label the people who support it as. The world isn't black and white where you either have to be one thing or another, its a lot more complex than you think.

>liberals
>for censorship

Americans really need to find another word for their screeching leftists.

You must be talking of classical liberalism, blame amer*cunts for the new meaning of liberalism

>amer*cunts
the board really would improve if we range banned them, but i feel bad for the ones that are only here because their library is dvds and kids books

>Yuros blaming america on all their problems yet again

you wish you were American lol

>too stupid to even imagine life is better elsewhere
been suckin' up the ol propaganda shitsludge I see.

You mean those two listings from previous runs? I think the price that people are paying alone justifies at least a limited run, but to stand a chance at ever getting published again it'll need to get picked up by Dalkey Archive basically.

europe doesn't have a literature problem nor a monolingual problem. why the fuck would anyone want an american education? it's basically just a chinese status symbol for rich kids.

nyrb might pick it up. penguin stopped publishing emmet grogan and nyrb picked him up pretty much immediately. i think they're getting a lot of stuff just when it drops off other publisher's lists.

Don't know about pushing out, but I can certainly guess what they are going to push in. A lot of books about gender-fluidity, assault, trying to get over trauma but inevitably failing and committing suicide as a message against harassment, and maybe some little snippets of the communist manifesto for high schoolers.
I know my sci-fi prof for an english gen-ed put a couple of the gender-fluid ones in his class with Left Hand of Darkness and Ancillary Justice. Didn't really mind Left Hand, but the whole thing with Ancillary was pronouns (everyone is referred to as a form of "she"), yet the only confirmed male in the book (another character says he is a he) is introduced bloodied and passed out in the snow, outside a bar with a space-age equivalent to a meth addiction. Couldn't have seen that from a mile away... :P

hey antifa, u triggered?

Why do books that Jews deem to be offensive get banned from Amazon but books offensive to Christians don't get banned? Check out this quite brief vid. The Brother makes good points.

youtube.com/watch?v=914DvVBm0dY

Some books shoah'd by Amazon.

pastebin.com/Lm6ckeDE

You're trying really hard to find excuses for why those examples "don't count," I can tell. Just another example of a delusional leftist who can't admit his theology is garbage even when he is presented with the exact evidence he demands.

>delusional leftist who can't admit his theology
>his theology

Amazon is a private organization, it isn't required to give access every idea

Liberals aren't censoring everything, but I suspect this is bait.

They should, but then again things on that list truly deserve to be cut.

I work in a school as a TA.

Our library has IT by Stephen King.

I thought about warning the librarian, but decided against it.

Not doing so is still censorship though. Which is the whole point. And the fact that Amazon has a near-monopoly means that when Amazon (i.e. liberals) censors something it virtually disappears.

Equality etc. are religious belief systems.

mate you can easily find books on hitlerism on Amazon.

Conservatives used to be the bad guys and now its the liberals. Times change.

terminally retarded i see

ITT: Waaaaaaaah I can't read my favorite nazi agitprop

Huckleberry Finn, definitely. It will only be among the ultra SJW types of schools with a lot of black people at them though. Any book with the word "nigger" in it will be banned basically, unless it is written by a black person. Historically in the US conservatives were the ones trying to ban books , but that is until recently like around the 90's when that began to change.

>Liberals aren't censoring anything
>Dude everyone wuz racist n shit
>Dats all history eva wuz, bunch nigga hating white raycis

>50 replies

never got past the Greeks I see

white peple disgust me

>With liberals beginning to censor everything
only a /v/ or /pol/ crossposter could make such a broad, dumb post

>holocaust denial
literally no place for it in society

samefag

Because of Racism
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Gone with the Wind
The entire works of Mark Twain
The work of Conrad

Yet so very accurate, my dude.

probably nothing

Nothing will be banned by the government, but a lot of things will he quietly excised from google books and google search results, removed from libraries during regular pruning of the collections, removed from archive.org and similar sites, become unable to find publishers, and basically become inaccessible to all but a small number of academics who already know what they're looking for. That's what we get for allowing women to take over publishing and a small number of giant tech conglomerates to take control of the flow of information online.

Banning books is authoritarian, not necessarily conservative. Commies ban books and are revolutionary utopian progressives. So are fascists and natsocs

>Conservative means authoritarian a priori
Piss off brainlet

my diary desu

Huckleberry finn lol
Frederick Douglass for being an Uncle Tom

that would be nice, yes. I think the problem with that is that censorship isn't necessarily an extremist view. I know a lot of house-wives who would love to see all sorts of things censored. There should be a new political party specifically for middle-aged house-wives just to get them out of politics.

Why are you so fixated on "house-wives" when they barely even exist anymore and single feminist women are far more censorious and far more of a danger to liberty than they are or ever have been?

Ultra Christian House wives are the conservative equivalent of feminists. In other words
>Women are women regardless of political orientation

How is Conrad racist?

>How is heart of darkness racist
user...

>lol
Lurk more, or go back to plebddit.

>has option to go back to 90s/00s
>Google stocks

Tfw not sure if you're a sophisticated troll or so fundamentally financially illiterate that you aren't aware of the many, many better options.

I mean if we're all honest going back 7 years for bitcoin would go from 1k to 42 billion

Bitcoin is a meme. It doesn't matter how supposedly valuable they are if it's impossible to convert anything more than tiny amounts into dollars or another currency which is actually usable in the real world.

...

yikes

self crit now or ban

German here, Mein Kampf is by far not the only book banned and the only reason it's legal to buy atm is due to the fact that they CAN'T ban ist again with the current legal codex. But you still will not be able to find it without "critical context" by some lefty author for around 200€.

And here is a list of the banned books in germany, not even listing the once since the millenium

volksbetrugpunktnet.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/folgende-bucher-sind-in-deutschland-freie-meinungsauserung-laut-gg-auf-den-index-gesetzt/

And mind you there aren't any oficial lists as the staate isn't willing to release them. Atm there are aruond 35.000 books banned as far as we know from their authors.

its sad that anyone can just yell "racist" without backing it up and immediately ruin someone or somethings reputation

until they overdo it and we make racism great again

>silly Americans and their silly problems!
Is that why even a slight reference to nazism in Germany is against the law? So why is it that you can get arrested for saying you hate Muslims in the UK? Not to mention the way your politicians bend themselves over backwards to accommodate the hordes of refugees currently pouring into your continent at the expense of the native populations.

I'm all for hating my country but at least understand Yurop is just as quickly running down the drain.

>just as

we're going quicker m8

>It's funny you immediately move on to obscure sci-fi for fat virgin nerds. Official reasoning of why it wasn't republished was shit sales
It only became obscure after it was blacklisted. There were 20-odd Gor books, and they sold by the truckload back in the day.

OP is presumably from Murca, where liberals are really authoritarians, and conservatives are really radicals. Such is the average Murcan's grasp of politics.

sorry, due to americans it's impossible to know wtf you mean by "liberals". could be anything these days.

contributing to american degeneracy

I don't know that screeching leftists OR their conservative analogs in America have ever really successfully "censored" anything in a long time.

Some texts might become used less, but none will like... stop being available. And even then most capital-L Literature tends to come down on the left side of things, in large part one imagines because the left tends to be the ones who give out big arts bursaries and invest in the arts.

But like I dunno... I think most high school lit books are already scrubbed pretty clean at this point, certainly too clean to incite much ACTUAL controversy that isn't just being overblown by some media outlet on a slow day. Like... The Merchant of Venice probably won't show up in a lot of high school curriculum as its already disappearing from said curriculum due to the implicit antisemitism. But you can still go ahead and read the fucking thing, it's not like they're having mandatory book burnings, you reactionary retard.

>And even then most capital-L Literature tends to come down on the left side of things

The only way you could believe this is if you had somehow come to the conclusion that literature began in the twentieth century.

>large part one imagines because the left tends to be the ones who give out big arts bursaries and invest in the arts.

Name even one piece of good literature which resulted from government funding. Almost all great literature was produced by individuals sponsored by wealthy noblemen or the Church.

>over half the population

Of what? The world? America? Yuropistan? Because your statement applies only to the last of those

90% of literature written before 1990 contains homophobic or transphobic elements. 90% of lit written before 1970 additionally contains misogynist elements. And 90% of lit written before 1950 additionally contains racist elements.

Expect literature to be banned, censored, or rewritten in chronological order, beginning with the oldest. In America, the first amendment will prevent most legislative censorship, so publishing oligopolies and academia will do it for us, free of charge.

>americans
>"liberals"

American socialists were not getting any traction in the late 19th century. So they re-labeled themselves as "Liberals".

Except conservatives are liberals.

>All the leftshit morons on this board are yuropoors

Im starting to think you may be right, my friend. The commie indoctrination is very powerful across the Atlantic

Don't even get me started on American liberals. I tell you there is no dumber group of people in existence.

Canadian liberals are dumber.

A British man was arrested for quoting Winston Churchill's "The River War" in public.

telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10792895/Election-candidate-arrested-over-Churchill-speech.html