the problem isn't what it represents, but how a character just straight up said what was happening in the scene. Like why would he say "from my point of view"?
why wouldn't he say something more natural like "No! It's the jedi who are evil! I know what you have done!" or something like that (I'm not a screenwriter obviously), its more mocking the stilted odd way in which Lucas wrote all of anakins lines
Morality has subjective and objective as well as relative and absolute components.
>he doesn't realise that subjectivity morality exists alongside objective morality
>he doesn't realise that an understanding of objective morality can only be attained through God's grace
FIrst, It was delivered terribly. Second, it was shoehorned in to fit in with Obi-Wans "from a certain point of view" lines in Return of the Jedi.
Men (most of them) have an instinctive perception of good and evil. This changes from man to man. In a given society, morality was built during history and followed by people who happened to be born in that society and didn't become criminals. So, good and evil exist in communities of men, but have no transcendent origin, because they are human concepts. Any other answer is wrong.
Literally everything we consider objective on earth exists outside the human conscience except for morality which isn't practiced by anything other than humans. I highly doubt this is the one exception.
>morality has no transcendent origin
Wolves might kill rodents for fun, but they don't kill each other for fun. Is this not a primitive form of morality?
Species that kill each other for fun probably don't survive for us to see.
A wolf isn't a moral agent