*obliterates capitalism*

...

Other urls found in this thread:

online-literature.com/tolstoy/2738/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

*obliterates pants*
UH OH

Go on...

i cum every time

online-literature.com/tolstoy/2738/

woah.....
*puts hand on chin, looks down in contemplation, and moans*
hmmmm.............
(i got it!)
man doesn't need any land when he's dead

Tolstoy (nor I) are communists, moron. Try another thread, brainlet.

why would the camper need the land he resides in?

>how much x does a person need?

I always found this argument disgusting. It's like saying "how many video games do you need?" or "how many electronics do you need?" A lot of socialists would take stuff you love away from you, if they could. It doesn't matter what I NEED, it matters what I WANT, and if I can get it ethically through voluntary exchange, that is fine.

la spacing du reddit

le /pol/ shitposting

el teen

You're a brainlet and you didn't get it.

Being greedy with land deprives others of means of subsistence. Although hoarding manga and Final Fantasy games may have a consequence, the consequence will not be nearly as devastating as greed with land.

It's not about captialism but greed. Pahom had worked his way up to a considerable amount of land, was on the verge of buying more, but the prospect of more land at a cheaper price killed him. The devil played to his greed and he died because of it.

Poor people are subhuman and capitalism can only be improved by returning the plebs to serfdom, possibly slavery.

of course he didn't read the story

Good goy

retarded peasant who doesn't understand rent or how to measure distance kills himself. the end.

>greed

there's that word again....... sigh......

Yasss Communism is answer, comrades. Fuck food.

why do teens post here if they despise the act of reading

Also, Nowhere near that proportion of the Russian population died even with Stalin and 2 world wars.

>ethically through voluntary exchange,
good liberal also pay your taxes

>famines like the Holodomor were deliberate genocides
>Everybody starves under Communism because of poor resource management

Pick one.

There is a third way user

No, they genocided many any still didn't have enough to feed the ones they wanted to keep.

>only tens of millions died instead of a hundred million
wtf i love communism now

Both those things are true though.

Only intelligent post, made by the only cunt who read the story. Never change, losers.

>the final sentence

american?