Was he right, Veeky Forums?
Was he right, Veeky Forums?
Alexander Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
quora.com
twitter.com
Eli Green
>tfw you agree with Locke and Nozick's justifications for private property, but hate the social and cultural effects of Capitalism.
He was definitely right about Capital being an atomizing and alienating force, but I don't buy the 'labour theory of value' (I know that this is considered a fairly easy target). I also don't agree that all non-class divides are made up in order to further Capital's interests - big business has been some of the biggest critics of the populist/nationalist uprisings and things like nested loyalty (ie, the lack of true pan-prole solidarity in the absence of false consciousness) seem to be just a biological fact of life
Ayden Jackson
about what?
William Roberts
Sort of.
Gavin Cook
I mean, sometimes, other times not. Enough of the time to be worth studying.
>9980935
LTV is at least less ridiculous than Smith's "invisible hand"
Gabriel Myers
he was right that capital accumulates in fewer hands
he was wrong in that this is the fault of capitalism, and it even a new phenomenon
en.wikipedia.org
Brody Jenkins
LTV is actually really misunderstood. I only learned about it recently and it's proving to be true
quora.com
Kevin Gomez
No, ideologies based on idealism are retarded.
t. Bakunin
Ian Gray
>tfw you agree with Locke and Nozick's justifications for private property, but hate the social and cultural effects of Capitalism.
what are those justifications?
Kayden Miller
Dumb russian