FUCKING HEAR ME OUT

delicious

What is delicious user?

What you feelz for the other person is just a product of your imagination, even if the other person is real. It is no a real world object that can be examined, it just inside your mind.
Also wtf even is love, the biological need to breed and protect your genetic descendants?

the grl

Well, I started out supposing Love as an analytical proposition, that is, love is the attachment of two human beings one for another and that's it. (Just like the proposition, bachelors are unmarried, you don't need to go out around looking for bachelors to be unmarried to disprove this proposition. It is in the ESSENCE of being a bachelor to be unmarried). So, in the same way, it is in the ESSENCE of the prop of Love that there be two human beings. But my question is: If the solipsist theory is correct, would that mean that even an analytical a priori proposition is false, even disconsidering all a posteriori facts? (Thus rendering all knowledge (at least of love or human relations) false even in the analytical view of propositions?)

I mean there are tons of things about the world that you don't know in depth. You can imagine complexity without imagining the underlying mechanisms.

>Yeah, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't ponder on the underlying mechanisms. Philosophy so far has been only about that. You can and SHOULD ponder on the underlying mechanisms of the World even when you don't know every complexity there is on the university, you fucking dipshit.

>M8, fucking think about it.
>i know some words but don't understand what they mean: the post

I dunno, I could start to argue you out of your conclusion

Literally the most embarrassing post I have ever seen here and that's a really high bar to surpass. I honestly think this is advanced meta-ironic shiteposting. Good job because you fucking got me