Hegelians

its a cactus salt shaker.

thank you

>Unless you're doing some sort of charity work
Go be spooked somewhere else, faggot

>defending ""productivity""
>calling out other's spooks
Put the pepner back on the shelf and leave, brainlet.

I'm not the OP, this was my first post ITT. Nice try. Now go back to >>>/reddit/.

All I have in hard-copy is an old beaten copy of the Early Theological Writings (somebody signed it 1976) and a book my now-passed mentor wrote on Hegel and philosophy of religion.

The former is well-worn and highlighted but still in great shape.

I just started part 4 of Spinoza's Ethics, then I will read Leibniz, then Kant. Kant is an objective on his own but so is Hegel and he'll be the next.

Skip Leibniz desu

>just started his lectures on aesthetics
I read that last year. My advice: if you're ever confused, just keep reading, and he'll make sense of himself eventually. Most of the 'important' bits are toward the end, when he starts developing tripartite distinctions.

Are you following any specific path like a chart or something or are you just kinda winging it?

I don't want to, I want to be told how I am made of infinite infinities ad infinitum.

I am fully aware of this one:
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1

As far as the path goes, I had already read the Presocratics (Heraclitus is my favorite, which brings me closest to Hegel), a bunch of dialogues by Plato, including all of his most famous ones, Aristotle's Categories, On Interpretation, Metaphysics, Descartes' Discourse on the Method and Meditations and now I'm reading Spinoza's Ethics. I've already read Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

Ultimately I want to read canonical continental philosophy works, Marx and psychoanalysis until I can read contemporary guys.

>hegel

You'll die. I assure you you'll die.

>brainlet who can't understand logic
hahaha

...

hegel doesn't looks like heihachi. well kinda but what.. he looks more like eggman but if eggman wasn't ugly.

Schopenhauer

Dr. Eggman is Roosevelt

Why are there so many literal morons on this board?

Where should I start with Hegel? Would his lectures on early Greek philosophy be a good idea or are there other places to begin with the intent of tackling parts of Phenomenology?

See the link in:

Started the lit philo guide two years ago ... finally made it to Kant this summer. Been stuck there since. Hegel remains a tantalizing dream.

wow

Here's my stack of notes and comments.

empyreantrail.wordpress.com/

I've read the Phenomenology up to the end of the Unhappy Consciousness (only made logical expositions up to the Master/Slave, got burnt out after 5 months). Read the Science of Logic up to the end of chapter 2. Also read the First major section of Philosophy of History.

Overviews I've read are Winfield's "Hegel And The Future of Systematic Philosophy," pretty good for logic emphasis. White's "Absolute Knowledge: Hegel And The Problem of Metaphysics," pretty good ontological reading. I tend to just avoid reading second lit that goes into much depth because I want to think things freshly for myself.

Hegel is a bastard that can and will take your life if you let yourself get drawn into the details of the project. In the mere little I've read I've spent a year just mulling it all over and drawing things out of it.

thanks senpai ur shit is always appreciated. I don't understand it most of the time, it's confusing but I try to.

Just talk to me.

What other philosophers do/have you read? Anybody as extensive as your readings of Hegel?

Marx. It was before I got around online, and I didn't do anything close to the depth of analysis I've done with Hegel. But I did spend a few years on Marx and was very autistic about it just like with Marx.

If you look at my blog, I wrote an outline on a Fichte essay, and I went into it with the same level of autism that I go into my Hegel expositions. If I ever get into a philosopher, I take it seriously.

>spams his blog
>hasn't read the whole books

>its a cactus salt shaker.
Why do you put salt shakers in your arse?

lol truu

...

There are people who have read all the major books, and yet comprehend them far less than I do. Quality over quantity wins with Hegel.

what makes you think you can understand philosophy when you can't even set up your monitor correctly

I think there was a guy here writing his dissertation on Hegel and Marx actually

kierkegaard takes a messy shit all over hegel and his little followers. fuck the crowd, fuck the state, alle menschen werden brüder in your dreams fag