Hegelians

its a cactus salt shaker.

thank you

>Unless you're doing some sort of charity work
Go be spooked somewhere else, faggot

>defending ""productivity""
>calling out other's spooks
Put the pepner back on the shelf and leave, brainlet.

I'm not the OP, this was my first post ITT. Nice try. Now go back to >>>/reddit/.

All I have in hard-copy is an old beaten copy of the Early Theological Writings (somebody signed it 1976) and a book my now-passed mentor wrote on Hegel and philosophy of religion.

The former is well-worn and highlighted but still in great shape.

I just started part 4 of Spinoza's Ethics, then I will read Leibniz, then Kant. Kant is an objective on his own but so is Hegel and he'll be the next.

Skip Leibniz desu

>just started his lectures on aesthetics
I read that last year. My advice: if you're ever confused, just keep reading, and he'll make sense of himself eventually. Most of the 'important' bits are toward the end, when he starts developing tripartite distinctions.

Are you following any specific path like a chart or something or are you just kinda winging it?

I don't want to, I want to be told how I am made of infinite infinities ad infinitum.

I am fully aware of this one:
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1

As far as the path goes, I had already read the Presocratics (Heraclitus is my favorite, which brings me closest to Hegel), a bunch of dialogues by Plato, including all of his most famous ones, Aristotle's Categories, On Interpretation, Metaphysics, Descartes' Discourse on the Method and Meditations and now I'm reading Spinoza's Ethics. I've already read Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

Ultimately I want to read canonical continental philosophy works, Marx and psychoanalysis until I can read contemporary guys.