>this is what leftypol actually believes

HP Lovecraft
His world-building is wildly derivative of Poe and Bierce and his prose is abysmal. No discernible talent.

>Tolkien
Literally the worst prose of all time. Also stole a lot of ideas from William Morris. No discernible talent.

>Dostoevsky
Cheap sensationalism, clumsy and overwrought prose. Tolstoy's Anna Karenina alone is far superior to anything in Dostoevksy's oeuvre.

>Louis-Ferdinand Celine
Despite his reactionary anti-semitism, Celine wrote from an anti-bourgeois, pro-working class perspective. He also influenced many leftists and *gasp* French postmodernists, such as Barthes and Genet. You may want to rethink his inclusion in this shitty list of yours.

>Ezra Pound
Vorticism is trash and had zero influence on any subsequent art. No discernible talent.

>D.H. Lawrence
Ironically his only lasting influence was on Deleuzians and feminists.

>Ernst Junger
Please read Walter Benjamin's Theses of German Fascism if you truly believe Junger was a decent thinker, let alone one worthy of merit. Also, classifying him as an "artist" is a bit of a stretch.

>Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Terrible novelist and let's be honest, you've never read him and the only reason you've heard of him is because of some shitty Jordan Peterson video you watched on YouTube. The "statistics" in The Gulag Archipelago were pulled completely out of his own ass. Anyone using him as a historical authority on life in the early Soviet Union is being seriously grifted. Also a stretch to classify him as an "artist."

>talking shit about Pound and Jünger
This is just straight up philistinism.

what did you expect of fanatics

>mentions pound involvement in vorticism
>but not imagism, and we are going to ignore how influential he was within modernism as a whole
>Shitting on Tolkien's prose
>shitting on Tolkien at all

...

Jünger was hardly /pol/. The nazis would've censored his book criticizing fascism, called "Auf den Marmorklippen", if it weren't for Hitler, who personally stopped them out of his respect for the veteran.

>Jünger was hardly /pol/
Certainly not true (in that he was most definitely situated on what would be the "far right"), but regardless, that does not make him any less of an artist and intellectual.

They're right about Tolkien.

why did you choose to fight this proxy war on the book board instead of saying it to their faces

/pol/ is just far right desu, it's monarchists, fascist, and misc nationalists. They aren't all national socialists ffs, especially the Poles.

>Leftypol
It's a fucking shithole. If this is your only exposure to "leftism" and you only try to refute them, then you wont be prepared for the vast amount of leftists who actually organise. I think I remember trying to get some people from /leftypol/, like "Bat'ko", to join a union in our country. They just ignored it, because they're a literal NEET who thinks "anarchosyndicalism" will win when they don't even know how to unionise, let alone enter a workplace.

this is a literature board, not an imageboard-themed yelp

*blocks your path*

>this is a literature board
When's the last time anyone read here?

lefty/pol/ are tryhard reddit commies who actually think they can start a revolution from their mom's basement
Veeky Forums are patrician apathetic marxists who know there is no saving the working class

>Tfw used to be anarcho syndicalist
I know that feel desu. Sad part about most anarchists today is that most of them are either internet NEETS or edgelords who like to dress in black and throw bombs at people.
Trying to actually unionize?
>No
Community outreach programs and charities designed in an anarchist manner?
>No
Trying to educate the masses about anarchist economics and philisophy
>No

Instead let's just throw molotovs at people like criminals and circlejerk on the internet dude

ideologues have zero sensibility for aesthetics, these are people with arid souls

Dumb thread. I've seen these kinds of opinions from people of all sorts of politics.

>"derivative" as an insult
Stopped reading right there.

>read Walter Benjamin to find out why Junger is bad

Ok comrade.

>Please read Walter Benjamin

Kek

>marxists
kys faggot

>implying you don't have mongs too

What about Heidegger loser

>Veeky Forums are patrician apathetic marxists
sure buddy

>liberal man
>marxists
I feel like the reason why you hate cuckolding so much is because you're an incel who couldn't fathom the rush I get when I let my best friend fuck my girlfriend.

I would rather be a forever alone incel than something as pathetic as a cuckold desu desu

sorry, I was referring to Veeky Forums before it was overrun by retards like you

>Lovecraft
>No talent
Get fucked you absolute subhuman

you mean the reddit-esque syndicalist circlejerk of yore, with enlightned ones such as Sunhawk and butter-fucking-fly? lmfao

It's not pathetic though. You're so insecure, darling.

Yeah this right wing loser doesn't have the intellectual depth to understand the abstract enjoyment of watching your wife get smashed. It's like a personalized painting, the bull is just a tool, the object, if it were just you having sex there would be to much personalized subject to create something beautiful, that's just base pleasure. You have to be able to step outside of the interaction and observe the form and sensuality as something higher, other. Cuckolding is the perfect mix, it requires a great intellect, some will never understand

>You're so insecure, darling.
kek is that how you rationalize letting another man rail your girl?
you picture it as the ultimate act of male confidence?

Yes, even butterfly is a preferable alternative to you.

...

Lovercraft was a turgid georgian poet who was kind enough to apply that talent to fiction instead.
>anime reaction pic
>calls anyone subhuman
hats off, brother kekistani

And I am heavily amused by the notion that only leftists despise didacticist hacks like Solzhenitsin.

>male
>not being a gender nihilist in 2k17
>your girl
>male confidence
You're the real cuck conforming to a (((cutlure's))) norms.

The object par excellence?

>I am fond of The Hobbit,which is rarely pretentious, but The Lord of the Rings seems to be inflated, overwritten, tendentious, and moralistic in the extreme. Is it not a giant Period Piece?

>But there is still the burden of Tolkien's style: stiff, false archaic, overwrought, and finally a real hindrance in Volume III, The Return of the King,which I have had trouble rereading. At seventy-seven, I may just be too old, but here is The Return of the King, opened pretty much at random:
>"At the doors of the Houses many were already gathered to see Aragorn, and they followed after him; and when at last he had supped, men came and prayed that he would heal their kinsmen or their friends whose lives were in peril through hurt or wound, or who lay under the Black Shadow. And Aragorn arose and went out, and he sent for the sons of Elrond, and together they labored far into the night. And word went through the city: ‘The King is come again indeed.' And they named him Elfstone, because of the green stone that he wore, and so the name which it was foretold at his birth that he should bear was chosen for him by his own people."
>I am not able to understand how a skilled and mature reader can absorb about fifteen hundred pages of this quaint stuff. Why “hurt or wound”; are they not the same? What justifies the heavy King James Bible influence upon this style? Sometimes, reading Tolkien, I am reminded of the Book of Mormon. Tolkien met a need, particularly in the early days of the counterculture in the later 1960s. Whether he is an author for the duration of the twenty-first century seems to me open to some doubt.

based bloom destroying all genre fiction

No, this is a strawman of what leftposters actually believe, created by a reactionary.

>hurt and wound are the same
I dunno, seems like a real brainlet to me

Right wingers thinking that Celine would have done anything other than mock them in a torrent of ellipses and exclamation marks make me laugh

This post is incredibly Jewish

Was Ezra Pound a Vorticist? I thought that was Wyndham Lewis. Noting Celine's "anti-bourgeois, working class perspective" doesn't do much, it would be the same as claiming Knut Hamsun for the Left. These were cynics well ahead of the curve, not the kind to fall for 19th century 1848 fantasies and delusions. Their perhaps regrettable endorsement of fascism stems from their non-bourgeois modernity. D.H. Lawrence, who seems more apolitical, also belongs to this category. I would hesitate to claim them as political authors at all. Too hard on Junger, stinks of bitterness. I don't know why he treats Benjamin's essays like God revelation. Post-war German intellectual circles are full of this shitflinging. It is not as if people of left-wing disposition don't like Junger's work.

These authors should cease being thought of primarily in political terms. Politics is hell-disgusting. False consciousness. Warped evil lenses. People's appetites for politics is like their appetite for their own sexual fetishes. Selfish, crude and rude. Reading things of the realm of politics - distinct from reading all books as if they were political erotic novels, to satiate some hungry little obsession of mine.

lmao

Like leftypol would know who Ernst Junger is.

Hey 4/pol/, it must be exciting you just found out where /leftypol/ is but you don't have to shit on them on Veeky Forums of all places. If anything, those damn Marxist-Leninist Armchair revolutionaries read more than any other board besides this one.

>pretending to be your worst idea of a liberal because you think it'll turn people off liberalism by association

Pure cancer falseflagger filth.

No, I ironically believe all that. I was obviously hamming it up for them. Time to read Stirner, budd-o.

No, Pound was an imagist and friend of Lewis, the progenitor of Vorticism.

>/leftypol/
>reading
Kek.

>Associating Pound with Vorticism and not with his later Cantos, which are some of the absolute finest poems ever fucking written
>Being needlessly contrarian about Dostoevsky to the point of disagreeing with Mikhail fucking Bakhtin about him
>Solzhenitsyn was a terrible novelist and The Red Wheel isn't one of the finest long-form polyphonic novels
No fucking way these people are real

Pound wrote for a last and signed the Manifesto of Vorticism, but Vorticism as a whole is really just footnote in both his career and Wyndham Lewis's. It was ultimately a failed project, and Pound really should be remembered for his Pisan Cantos (And Lewis for Revenge for Love/Tarr/The Vulgar Streak)

>unironic presentism taken to the point of caricature
>hurt and wound are the same