that's not how retrocasuality works at all. if he used retrocausality you would have already written and published the idea, only it would have been due to his (or your) future actions
Post Your Novel Ideas
That's a fnorkman
STFU IDIOT
Nice
I have the skeletal impression of a story wherein a man tries to educate an AI through dialectic, but ultimately fails as the AI is not able to bridge the syntactic gap between objectivity and subjectivity owing to its fundamental lack of physics-bounded senses and the quintessentially subjective mode of sensory intellect.
In the end the man, driven into an existential fervor, kills the machine.
Oh yeah, I guess I didn't think of that. It would be kind of lame if the AI just vanished.
I'm not sure. I haven't thought that far ahead, I suppose.
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. It does seem rather similar. At least according to the definition of it here:
rationalwiki.org
I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T KNOW!
Is a hulder anything like a huldra? Because fuck anyone who references huldras.
He wrote Infinite Jest. He used to be s bigger deal around here
I am too sad to try to write my 1800 page video game novelization now
So what’s his motivation in all this