BMW drivers have no idea how to solve a problem other than throwing money at it...

An example of a Chinese train in a NON-TOURIST area.

Not him but every beaner in my neighborhood has a 20+ year old bmw, pretty sure they're not car enthusiasts

That's because you live in a shithole.

>enthusiasts

AUTISM
U
T
I
S
M

>From what I heard, they often kill the pedestrians because regardless whether it's related to the specific car incident or not, the offender must pay for the healthcare costs of the victim for the rest of their lives.
China has long been a land where to get to the top, you have to lack ethics. In a land of ruthlessness, ethics is considered to be an achilles heel. So it's a simple situation of Pay Forever or only pay a smaller amount (or none if you have political power).

If the USA had similar penalties, there would be a LOT more deaths of witnesses too. For example, last year in my area, a witness was spared by the black robber since he didn't want to kill her. So he merely dug his fingers into both her eyes to blind her. She can't ID him now. as she was the only one to see his face as all store cameras had bad high angles which his hoodie and baseball cap stopped any good view of his face. Black Lives Matter. And he spared hers despite her being white. Time to Applaud. Because the USA doesn't have tough laws like China, the criminals aren't forced to kill victims and witnesses.

There are air pollution laws in china as agreed to when China was arguing with the USA (President Clinton) to get Most Favored Nation trade status from the USA. As you can see, China followed its agreement requirements.

>lethally shooting a robber in your home to make sure he's not a threat and also won't sue you (actually does happen)
>accidentally running over a kid and making sure she's dead so her parents don't sue you
Nice false dichotomy you turbofag

They seem fairly similar to me. But gun fans always git mad at anything negative about gun usage. They are so /pol/

>commits crime on innocent, chooses to kill innocent
>defend home from invader, kill them
same thing man

The part about right and wrong doesn't matter in that case because that is not the motivation for performing the killing. So, is it possible to ignore the political issues of right and wrong? In both cases, at the moment of decision, the person with the weapon chose to kill the target in order to prevent perceived harm to themselves and their family. That was the main and actual reason driving the decision to kill.

As for defending one's property, defending your home or defending your huge wealth are fairly similar things. In the chinese system where the clan's wealth matters, losing one cog can be a big deal, so defending that wealthy cog by eliminating the victim or witness is financially beneficial. But certainly, there is some sentiment for having people kill each other to save money for the taxpayers. More than one republican politician has expressed support for shipping all the violent criminals and felons to an island where they can farm and maintain the society and lifestyle they decided to have. Of course, it's clear that the usa politicians would like for the people to "run each other over" and reduce the costs of justice.

The lady with the car took justice into her own hands and delivered it. The result was another 350 yuan cremation funeral and a one time fee payout which could be welched upon with a properly bribed judge that favored the rich job offering people versus the poor person who lost her child.


**350 yuan is approximately the average cost of a low end cremation funeral in china

>things that happened