What happened?

Like the shit Mugabe did in the early 2000's was fucked up but don't paint the Rhodesian government under Ian Smith as anything resembling good government.

Der Ewige Jude strikes again with the disgusting Anglo elite helping.

t. Englishman

>people who will cry when nigs get btfo in the coming years

It was based on meritocracy. If you can't provide evidence proving it was shit, refrain from saying so, libkike.

There is a difference between tribal blacks not wanting to go to school and the purposefully withholding funds.

If you have 10,000 whites to educate and 2000 blacks and suddenly claim there is a massive difference in the amount spent on blacks and whites of course it will look ilke it is underfunded.

They did not want to participate because Commies whispering in gibmedats ears that they could just take it.

Voters on the A Roll had their vote count more then the votes on the B Roll.

For the constituencies (, if the B roll total exceeded one-fifth of the total votes, it was devalued to a maximum of one-fifth. In practice, this never happened, due to the African nationalist campaign to boycott elections. For the districts, if the A roll total exceeded one-fifth of the total votes, it was devalued to a maximum of one-fifth. This was always the case.

Just to put in in scope 65 seats (50 constituencies and 15 districts).

White students had much more funding dedicated to them for education then the Blacks. They did not share a budget at all the white school children received much more per child then the black child did. The education for the rural blacks was paid out of pocket by the parents of these kids or by missionaries.

The whole voting system and education systems flaws were designed so that the "slow integration" of power would take literally forever because it had so much counter measures to make sure integration would be hindered by the several checks in the system.

They let a terrorist participate in government. He then killed whites or ran them off. Nothing was done about it because of anti colonial sentiment.

Zimbabwe-Rhodesia would have been a decent country. If they could have just kept Mugabe and other commie terrorists out.

>>>/freech/

>White students had much more funding dedicated to them for education then the Blacks. They did not share a budget at all the white school children received much more per child then the black child did.

So you're saying it takes the same amount of resources to stop tribal blacks from shooting up each other and learning to read as it does to teach a white land management and the way an internal combustion engine works.

If you mean there were checks in place to stop the whole system going to shit like every other African nation, then yes, there were checks. This had never been done before, every other action on this subject had gone to shit and resulted in decrease in life expectancy, standard of living, quality of life and all lanyards of a well managed nation.

Not to mention the blacks that lived in the cities were of equivalent education and there was already black participation in government from them.

Highest education rate in the whole of Africa.

...

No the amount of tax dollars given to a white children was much more then for Blacks so the white child had much more resources and investment in his education then the Black child.

The Rhodesian government could not handle giving Whites and Blacks the same standard of education because it would heavily strain the government budget.

Not that impressive when the education system of the colonies are piss poor awful. Rhodesian education was the best on the continent but for the citizens of the country it wasn't equal at all.

youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw
That_not_that_but_that.webm

The fact is blacks in Rhodesia had the highest literacy rate in the whole of Africa and one of the highest in the world in which blacks and whites lived together.

What was happening in the US at this time? Segregation. Martin Luther King was campaigning for equal rights and equal represenation for citizens who had gradually been educated over time.

Are you trying to a pull are "You are lynching Negros" on me? That's pretty Soviet of you.

How is asking for equal education socialism?

...

>How is asking for equal education socialism?
My comment is that they were much better off than they would otherwise be and in the end were tricked into advocating their downfall because someone else had it better.

You had non commie Blacks advocate for equality and Ian struck those down and the more he struck down peaceful black protests the more it garnered support for more extremists.

Ian built up his own demons lad and thinking that people would want to be treated like second class citizens in their own country is pretty stupid.Like fuck a training college of semi-skileld labour got shut down because the white trade unions got pissed and strong armed Ian into closing the school.

Didn't took long for the Internal Settlement Plan to kick in once Ian and the RF pulled their heads out of their asses and dissolved themselves. Zimbabwe-Rhodesia was literally the best outcome. It was a fucking shame thag the US and Brits didn't recognized it

This

Shorter version

:(

youtube.com/watch?v=ZbM_0hRTSiA

forgot pic

This is now a Rhodie Thread

...

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=QVCzYLxBK74

...

Africa was better under white rule

prove me wrong fags
pro-tip: you can't

I'm certainly not about to pretend that most of the black leaders that emerged in africa were anything other then barbarian thugs straight from stormfront's darkest nightmares.

...

Why are their hands so tiny? You know what they say about men with tiny hands.

youtube.com/watch?v=mmwEnfyFTtY

If you assume Rhodesia is about Whities, then you are missing the entire point of why they fought

...

Sure it's bigger than race lad but don't pretend that isn't a component of it.

What the fuck is this.
Was it translated from fucking tribal, or something?

Yeah, they just needed mo' money fo' dem programs, right? Mugabe dindu nuffin, wuza good boi.

[citation needed] Currently seems to be going along the lines of dindu nuffin, SYSTEMATIC RAYCISSM

Overall, far too many of the posts here seem to be going along the lines of:
>dey wuz rayciss
Look at fucking Zimbabwe now. Look at what happens when you give terrorist groups power because 'muh raycesm'

Anyone know where I can find Rhodesia's code of law?
youtube.com/watch?v=clIjgSPRSqY

>lol who needs actual historical documents when you have anonymous unsourced posts on anime imageboard

...

it is from the glorious somali basketweaving book club form

...

...

...

...

beautiful

Oh no, good thing a dumb nigger and his warlords took power then
People who make Rhodesia about race are fuck yards, fact is there was a prosperous nation in Africa that niggers ruined

...

...

...

...

...

...

Suggest one faggot.
Or anyone else for that matter, I'd love a good book on Rhodesia.

They jus needed mo money fo dem programs

Nkomo did nothing wrong, he wanted to team up with the whites against Mugabe, but that wasn't political viable without equal voting rights. He wasn't a commie, they just came up to him and said "psst, hey kid, I heard you were fighting a revolution, want free weapons?"

Great Betrayal by Ian Smith

...

I never understod /pol/´s obsession with poorly made text/image amalgamation. Do you guys actually think that someone will read your "infographic" and go "whoa, I totally didn´t know that, this awesome and totally well sourced and objective .jpg file convinced me, I´m gonna hate jews and Blacks now"

>Now, smith was a bit racist, b-b-b-b-b-but no more so than the average American or Brit in the 1960's
Come on lads this guy wasn't even trying to be objective. I enjoy reading about Rhodesian history but every thread about the subject is a 1-way ticket to /pol/ territory. Why are people here so reluctant to acknowledge that the Rhodesian government was in fact a racist institution? It's not quite feasible to let a white minority rule a black majority in fucking Africa itself, especially if voting is coupled to education (the concept makes sense though). The British government was right in demanding that things would change over there.
However that doesn't make the events that followed less sad or the Rhodie bush soldiers less based. Just don't come in here saying 'Whities dindu nuffin we wuz just farmers n shieet'

>Why are people here so reluctant to acknowledge that the Rhodesian government was in fact a racist institution?
Because unlike you we don't think all blacks are stupid niggers.
It's 2012 you bigot.

>It's not quite feasible to let a white minority rule a black majority in fucking Africa itself
sub-70 IQ's...
And as has been said in this thread, blacks in the cities were as well educated as whites and participated in government.
Tribal niggers refusing to learn is no excuse for destruction and genocide.

>literally just let bush niggers run your country, what could go wrong???

>what could go wrong
I'm sure everything will turn out fine...

>poorly made

who the fucks put effort in something that is jsut TLDR

THICC

Anyone who wants to be taken seriously

Maybe you should try a vacation in SA

Because the black population was breeding like flies while contributing next to nothing in tax revenue. It was Whites who built the schools, hospitals, roads, farms, everything. They were helping the blacks as much as they could but there's only so much anyone can feasibly do with limited resources.

Seriously, is it so hard for blacks to teach other blacks how to read? Why is everything the White man's responsibility? They had access to all the technology and information in the entire world, but they completely failed to take that and replicate it.

The Japanese didn't have that problem. They sent out some smart dudes to learn, then they came back and taught the rest of their country. Do Africans have no agency?

There was no country at all before the Whites got there. Those tribals had never even seen a wheel before. Everything they have was given to them by Whites

you have to remember that the average liberal sees black people as little children who just want to have fun and dance and play music and that it isnt fair to expect them to do grown up things.

That's pretty accurate tho. If you include rape and violence in with singing and dancing

haha fuckin cuckberals amirite?

quick, someone dump all those cartoons of what all KEKberals literlaly think lol

c'mon now there are black people who are trying

>I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years

- pres. johnson

The problem was that the white leaders educated themselves and recruited the best leaders from the black population. This meant that when the white people+black supporting cast was killed/chased off there were no people to lead shit. So there was no other leader to push mugabe's shit in and try to get the country back on the road.Then you also have to consider that not only an unfit leader was leading the country, the country just got stripped off it whole governmental apparatus.

So what you have left over is a country with an unfit leader with poor control over the country and very few intellectuals.

and the tragedy is that the (((international community))) withdrew support from rhodesia with full knowledge that this is exactly what would happen

The funny thing is, there's no reliable source that L.B.J. ever said that.

>you have to remember that the average liberal sees black people as little children

This 100x. They always make a boatload of excuses for them doing things white people commonly get chastized for.

yes user i'm sure a tall texan from the sixties who nicknamed his pecker jumbo would never use the n-word or be dismissive towards african-americans. youre right its probably a fake quote some stormweenie invented.

>no source for the quote
>well, he *totally* would've said it...

Still waiting.

oy vey morty give me a break over heah yeesh! we both know nothing i provide you with will satisfy you no need to be a putz about and you're making me terribly verklempt!

Don't you lot routinely complain about how shit-tier lefties and SJWs are at providing evidence and having rational debate?

>we both know nothing i provide you with
You have nothing to provide me with.
The only source for that quote, AFAIK, is a lone book, and it's never been backed up by anyone else.

oy you really like to turn the screws don't ya?! but it aint an accident that quote is popularly attributed to lbj on account of the fact that it undoubtedly reflects the general attitude of the time period which i must remind you is what is actually being debated i.e. that liberals often view blacks as children. *phew*

Again, all I would like is some actual proof that L.B.J. ever quipped about how he would "have those niggers voting Democrat for 200 years"

A dubious quote doesn't reflect anything.

but you agree that it is entirely possible a known madman like lbj could have said something like that and that many liberal politicians are condescending towards black people?

No more than any right-wing/Republican politician *could* have said it, or that right-wingers are condescending towards black people.

It's funny, because you're basically doing what is illustrated in your picture.

>he said it
>well maybe he said it
>he *could've* said it
>maybe he didn't say it, but it still proves my point

why is everyone condescending towards black people do you think?

Mugabe commits genocide against the white Rhodesians.

Ian denies franchise to most africans until they prove themselves to be mentally equal to whites. Doesn't fund education equally.

What does this have to do with the fact that L.B.J. likely never used that quote?