how accurate is this advice?
How accurate is this advice?
that be genetics
%100
Pretty accurate. You may need to do isolation work on arms, lateral delts and calves (for example) but thats it...
Strength does not automatically = aesthetics e.g. most dudes I see lifting heavy are usually a bit chunky around the middle.
Yes, you can look pretty decent just doing compounds and oly lifts and I had good noob results doing 5x5, but hypertrophy based routines will get you there more effectively.
>Strength does not automatically = aesthetics
that's not what it says though. the whole statement is "if you're eating right and training right, strength=aesthetics". if you're fat you're not eating right. if you improve your strength while eating a small surplus you're getting bigger, and if you have a balanced physique with a good amount of muscle mass and low bf% then you're typically pretty aesthetic.
>No Calves
>No leg flexion
>No horizontal pull i.e. Barbell Rows
>No Hip Flexion
>Not training power with Oly lifts
>No forearm extension work
All he has is Chest, Traps, Abs and Tris
>All he has is Chest, Traps, Abs and Tris
Those are the only things that matter.
Muscles in order of importance:
>Back
>Shoulders
>Adonis Belt
>Arms
>Legs
>Chest
>Abs
>>Back
>>Shoulders
>>Adonis Belt
Only people who care about these are power bottom fags who get fucked doggy.