Serious question, no banter. Why do you insist on using 1/2/3/4 as a milestone achievement instead of using bodyweight coefficient. 4pl8 diddly is a lot for someone who weighs 60kg, but it is laughable for fatties over 100kg. Also bench pressing twice your bodyweight is a lot more admirable then let's say 3pl8 and it say more about overall fitness of a said individual. I set myself goals of bench 2xBW, squat 3xBW and diddly 3,5 BW.
Pic related - this is what happens when you put abovementioned numbers into symmetricstrength
Good job dude, you just used your brain for the first time.
Brayden Cook
this is a manlet thread, sage wisely
Brandon Cox
bodyweight multipliers are for manlets and DYELs, the world record 335kg bench press by Kirill Sarychev is only 1.91xBW if we go by his wikipedia page bodyweight, look up square cube law
have a sage too
Andrew Garcia
>that moment when manlet OP thinks his 120 kg bench at a female bodyweight of 60 kg would be more impressive than kirills goat bench world record when will they ever learn, BW ratios are a cope for manlets that don't realize they have favourable levers too. A 100 kg adult benching 1.5x bodyweight is worlds more impressive than a 60kg midget little boy doing 2x
Oliver Lee
Since when 180cm is manlet?
Christian Collins
>Falling for Veeky Forums memes
Enjoy being dyel forever
Xavier Reed
>180 >5'9"
Anything below 6'0" is manlet status, fucking manlet.
Aiden Moore
>180 cm >60 kg lmao, just stop it, twink manlet
Ryan Ortiz
I weigh 80kg, but still 60kg twink pulling 4pl8 would be more impressive than your bitch tits barely getting close to do one kipping pullup
Aiden Rogers
>manlet rage
Will they ever learn?
Colton Wood
Gz on using google you dumbfuck, just checked it - 5,9 feet not 5'9". Enjoy americunt education system.
Levi Wright
when will you learn
Nolan Barnes
When will I learn what? I have been here since 2009 and all I want to do is treat you like sane human beings not like trolls and/or retards, who enjoy pissing in an ocean piss as one has put it a few years ago (on trolling on 4chin).
Jason Harris
...
Ian Johnson
...
Grayson Murphy
I just hit 225, down from 300lbs.
My record lifts.
OHP: 135lbs x5reps; 145x1 BP: 225x5; 245x1 Sq: really don't know. My highbar max was 260x1, my lowbar is probably close to 300. Beltless. DL: 375x5; 405x1
7 months of cutting. No lifting prior.
Owen Ramirez
Is there an app for a symmetric strenght or do I have to go to their site each time?
Angel Nelson
Because BW multiples only apply to average height people. Manlets and lanklets get little use from them.
Connor Bell
because most people are in the 150-220 pound weight zone, and 1/2/3/4 is a perfectly adequate milestone for 8-12 months at the gym at that weight. Not only is bodyweight coefficient autistic, it's also inherently flawed. No, a 130 pound person benching 260 pounds is not "better" than a world record bench presser
Lincoln Reed
You could pay for the app
Thomas Gonzalez
None of you will ever be on elite level, so don't compare yourself to those people. 130lb pressing 260lb is a better achievement, than 225lb pressing 375lb.
Thomas Wilson
Yeah it's pretty much 1/1.5/2/2.5x BW instead of 1/2/3/4
Isaac Bennett
175cm is 5'9, 180cm is 5.9 feet or 5'11
congrats on being a colossal retard
Carson Adams
...
Colton Nguyen
So for most people it would be around 75-90kg ohp, 112,5-130kg bench press, 150-180kg squat and 187,5-225 diddly
Levi Reyes
no it isn't
Dominic Cooper
no, it isn't, a 375 bench is far better than a 260 bench in any case. You can start with body ratios at elite levels, but not before that
Christopher James
It is. Ask yourself, who is more fit - someone who can do 10 proper pullups at 185 body weight or someone who can do barbell rows with 250 weighing 350 and not a single pullup? If you choose the latter, then you are either retarded or just baiting, both equally bad. Or even fucking luck at professional strength athletes. Who seems more fit - manlet Thomas Faber or gigantic fatso Patrick Baboumian?
Wyatt Clark
this is pure manlet cope And if you want to start the ratio bullshit pre-elite levels, I'll go ahead and suggest wingspan adjustments too, meaning that say a 6" difference in wingspan takes away 100 lbs on e.g. bench. But nah you wouldn't because you're a triggered little manlet.
And a 375 bench is better than 260 in any case, I don't care if you're a skeleton, 260 bench ain't worth shit and can be seen in every gym while a 375 bench is rare.
Zachary Ramirez
except that's not what the comparison is at all, so let's go with your original and much less retarded example instead
a 375 bench at 225 is a bench wilks of 102.70, a 260 bench at 130 is a bench wilks of 102.20
so it's actually pretty close by powerlifting standards
>but
Wilks coefficient doesn't matter in real life, and nobody gives a fuck about your 260lb bench max when someone else is putting up 315+, it's just irrelevant (just like "men" under 6 feet tall)
Joseph Sanders
Now I get it, you are all fucking retarded. Look at differences in weight categories. Being able to press 2x BW will give you a medal in any category, but OPEN. Being able to squat 3xBW will make you an elite lifter in any category, but OPEN. You know why, because open is ridden with fat pieces of shit, who have bitch tits and still are just barely stronger, than guys who compete in 105kg.
Cooper Sanchez
manlet rage
Owen Hill
Lol you are implying there aren't records based on that coefficient you fuckwit
Grayson Clark
I wonder how angry you have to be to enjoy shit posting at this level post body and lifts
Ryan Diaz
>tfw finally hit 2x bw bench feelsgoodman pic related, me and my bitches
Isaac Jenkins
They are, just like programs' rep and set ranges, totally arbitrary. People are different, who would have thought. All certain rep ranges help with is enforce guiding principles that will help people gain muscle mass, lose fat, become stronger, or a combination of all. Any low iq niggers who autistically count and enter each exact number of reps on a given day and thinks it makes a big difference is beyond redemption
William Diaz
Was it mandatory that this pathetic cunt take a picture with these models? Or did he really want that? that webm always made me cringe when i see this sad cunt wait for an autograph and a pic
Asher Green
I want to see them spitroast him (or me).
Liam Adams
I've never done, thought or said any of that despite being firmly in manlet range at 5'8" Does it mean I have actual self esteem? Nothing else in my life seems to indicate so.
Luke Hughes
It's a meme, friend. Height matters, but nobody makes fun of manlets irl. There will probably be several epic replies telling me how wrong I am, but for real go outside and people won't care.
Andrew Hughes
I wasn't talking of being made fun of, though rare that can happen but it happens about basically any trait you have that's not above average, usually among friends though so who cares. I was talking about the insecurity aspect. While I've often thought "it'd be nice to be taller" or "at least I'm not that short", I've also thought "it'd be nice to be smarter/better looking/more athletic/funnier/more charming etc" but none of it has affected my life. I'm wondering how people who try to "cope" with their height react to all the other traits. If one thing effects you so much I can't imagine you being able to get out of bed at all.
That said if you're hilariously short/ugly/dumb/autistic I full agree you should have coping strategy for that specific trait. As long as you're within the top 66% for anything it really shouldn't even cross you your mind.
Ayden Hill
what a beauty
Easton Mitchell
Who is stronger?
A- 100lb man that benches 100lbs and squats 200lbs or
B- 300lb man that centres 300lbs and squats 600lbs?
B. He is objectively, measurably stronger.
Joseph Richardson
a 100lb man is a joke. a 150 lb man who benches 150 is going to be perceived as more athletic and fitter than a 300lb man by most. there is no amount of weight you could lift as a 300lb man that would get people to think strong before they think fat. you literally have to be an even taller brock lesnar for that to be true.
Ryder Cook
absolute strength =/= relative strength B has a higher absolute strength. For relative strength you can't just use multiples of your body weight. If you compare athletes, the lower the body weight, the higher the multiple of their body weight they can lift. In this example the wilks score of these two lifts combined are 155.44 for A and 229.14 for B, so even the relative strength is notably higher for B. A would have to be benching 145lbs and squatting 295lbs to have a comparable wilks score.
Ian Howard
this made me laugh hysterically
Connor Cruz
Who is stronger?
A- 150lb man that can perform 5 pullups in a set?
B- 300lb man that cannot perform any pullups unassisted?
A. He is objectively, measurably stronger.
Brandon Cook
Wtf man. You know that weight classes exist?
Jayden Davis
I love the fact how you fucking ignore, what I said in at least 2-3 posts here. So maybe capslock will help you I FUCKING ASKED ABOUT LEVEL OF FITNESS. I don't give a fuck about fatsos, who just go overall records. I would much rather look like Toshiki Yamamoto then like motherfucking Hossein Rezazedeh. Even though the second one has better totals, he still looks like shit.
Tyler Jones
>Been on fit for eight years >Still obsessing over 1/2/3/4 Jesus you are a pathetic and weak manlet
'Here' means 4chin, not Veeky Forums. I have been mostly browsing /b/, but those insufferable retards haven't learned shit throughout the years. Always putting blame on someone else for their own mishaps. As for Veeky Forums - I have been here for around half a year.
Logan Myers
Guy A has to lift 150lbs in 5 pullups while B has to lift 300lbs. So even if guy A manages to do it, it doesn't mean guy B couldn't lift say 250lbs. You wanna measure it, you gotta do something like lifting stuff off ground, where you can see a precise weight lifted
Mason Richardson
But in a survival scenario B is fucked
Jayden Foster
this, lmaoing at this deluded calisthenics guy. Guy A would only be objectively stronger if he could do 1 pullup with 150 lbs added
Hunter Allen
A could climb on a tree B can't. B is less athletic and his relative strength is worse. We don't know about the absolute strength which could be higher for B.
Parker Edwards
And? He's still objectively stronger if he can do only 1 pullup at 300 lbs. If you wanted survival go look at the military, all skinny/weak guys
Ryan Morgan
So, you miserable faggots, which one of you can do a strict, slow, non-false grip muscle up?
Grayson Martinez
In all honesty, it has to do with coordination too, doesn't it? I've done kipping muscles ups without a problem but I can't for the life of me do it slowly without kipping. I can do 25 pullups in a row without a problem and I can do 5 reps with 30kg added. How strong do you have to be to do a slow and controlled muscle up?
Jose Collins
Person A is objectively, measurably lighter you fuckin retard. Most 13 year old girls who do gymnastics can probably do more pulls ups then me but I'm pretty sure I could fucking rock their shit.
Isaiah Evans
are you fucking 4ft tall op?
Adrian Peterson
And are you fucking stevie wonder? I have already posted in this thread, that I am 180cm
Daniel Ward
Whats with the anchor tat? Are there a lot of manlets in the Navy?
Adam Davis
fuck ur symmetry t. chestlet
Ryder Cook
Fucking hell she didn't even look at the man baby, this truly is too much for man let's to recover from
Kevin Hughes
Your pull ups are shit. Do more dips. It can be done with raw strength. youtu.be/FFxq_aXpIPQ