Two blatantly obvious problems with the comparison.
1. It's not done to scale of population or time. You're doing the history of western imperilaism all over the world to the modern day vs. the population of communist countries in less time
2. It implies that the death toll would not be massively higher if all those nations were communist
this is fascination. could you recommend me some sources, books or websites, for more information on this?
Mao was rich. Stalin and Lenin weren't.
>The famine of 1921-22 was due to war communism
lol
>when it should've been a net exporter
It had only a fraction of its land suitable for agriculture. Most of the labor force worked in industry.
Whats the tallest building in Russia?
the lubyanka, you can see siberia from its basement.
The John Birch Society was crazy. Griffin is a conspiracy theorist.
>It had only a fraction of its land suitable for agriculture. Most of the labor force worked in industry.
Three of Russias worst famines occurred under communism when the USSR had world technology was advancing as a whole. See user here: The Russian economy was based around agriculture until the ussr tried to make it an even split between sectors.
So is anything communism as long as the people in charge claim to be communists? Is that how it works?
>it's another "/leftypol/ gets BTFO and starts posting shitty propaganda" thread
Don't you have some faggoty memes to be making?